You’re using a public version of DrugPatentWatch with 5 free searches available | Register to unlock more free searches. CREATE FREE ACCOUNT

Last Updated: April 25, 2024

Litigation Details for Purdue Pharma, L.P. v. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. - LEAD CASE (D. Mass. 2015)


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Small Molecule Drugs cited in Purdue Pharma, L.P. v. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. - LEAD CASE
The small molecule drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , and ⤷  Try a Trial .

Details for Purdue Pharma, L.P. v. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. - LEAD CASE (D. Mass. 2015)

Date Filed Document No. Description Snippet Link To Document
2015-08-06 1 Complaint three API patents, U.S. Patent Nos. 7,674,799, 7,674,800, and 7,683,072 (“the Improved API patents”), are…claims 3 and 19 of U.S. Patent No. 7,674,799; claims 30-34 and 76-79 of U.S. Patent No. 7,674,800; claims…infringed U.S. Patent Nos. 7,674,799, 7,674,800, and 7,683,072 (“the Improved API patents”), and that the…right, title and interest in United States Patent No. 7,674,799 entitled “OXYCODONE HYDROCHLORIDE… infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,652,497 (“the ‘497 Abuse-deterrence patent”), which relates to an External link to document
2017-06-01 139 Invalidity And Non-Infringement Of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,073,933, 8,652,497, And 9,155,717, Defendant Collegium… 6 August 2015 1:15-cv-13099-FDS Patent Defendant District Court, D. External link to document
2017-11-21 150 the 8α-removing, low-ABUK patent: U.S. Patent No. 9,073,933 (“the ’933 Patent”). 1. …oxycodone: U.S. Patent Nos. 8,652,497 (“the ’497 patent”) and 9,155,717 (“the ’717 Patent”). FAC, Exs. …low-toxicity patent.” (Id. ¶ 3, 12). Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P. also owns the low-toxicity patent and manufactures… B. Patents at Issue Purdue Pharma L.P., is the named assignee on two patents related to… The ’497 Patent The ’497 patent is entitled “Pharmaceutical Formulation Containing Irritant External link to document
2018-02-26 165 counts of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,522,919, the only patent at issue in member case 17-cv-10690… 6 August 2015 1:15-cv-13099-FDS Patent Defendant District Court, D. External link to document
2018-09-28 193 Memorandum & Order infringed U.S. Patent Nos. 7,674,799 (“the ’799 patent”), 7,647,800 (“the ’800 patent”), and 7,683,072…are U.S. Patent Nos. 9,073,933 (“the ’933 patent”), 8,652,497 (“the ’497 patent”), and 9,155,717 (“the…13, 2015. (’717 Patent). The ’717 patent shares a specification with the ’497 patent. C. …three related patents pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 271(a), (b), (c), and (e)(2)(A). The patents at issue are…related patents owned by Purdue are invalid. Second, Collegium asserts that even if the ’933 patent is valid External link to document
2015-11-09 27 invalidity of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,674,799 (the “’799 patent”), 7,674,800 (the “’800 patent”), and 7,683,072…enter final judgment of invalidity of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,674,799, 7,674,800, and 7,683,072. 86245129.1…three listed patents (that decision refers to the listed patents as the Low-ABUK patents). See Purdue…7,683,072 (the “’072 patent”) (collectively, “the listed patents”) based on collateral estoppel. Plaintiffs…plaintiffs, the same patents, and the same issues of invalidity with respect to the listed patents. External link to document
2015-11-23 31 7,674,799, 7,674,800, and 7,683,072 (“the Listed Patents”), 1 which are directed to oxycodone API with…numerous patented inventions, including the patents asserted against Collegium: (i) U.S. Patents Nos. 7,674,799…issued U.S. Patent No. 9,073,933 (“the ’933 patent”), from the same family as the Listed Patents (and also…Orange Book patents. See 21 U.S.C. § 355(b)(2)(A). 2 The Listed Patents and the ‘497 patent are at … genotoxic impurity; (ii) U.S. Patent No. 8,652,497 (“the ’497 patent”), which discloses and claims deterring External link to document
>Date Filed >Document No. >Description >Snippet >Link To Document

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.