2019-06-17 |
166 |
Redacted Document |
removed.
D.I. # 35-1, ʼ692 Patent at 1:29-46, 2:8-13; 2:16-22.
Pl. Response: Undisputed….S. Patent No. 7,507,083; U.S. Patent No. 7,674,442;
U.S. Patent No. 7,758,827; U.S. Patent No.7,776,301….S. Patent No. 7,955,577;
U.S. Patent No. 7,988,939; U.S. Patent No. 8,114,368; U.S. Patent No.….S. Patent No. 8,226,913; U.S. Patent No. 8,313,323; U.S. Patent No. 8,501,128;
U.S. Patent No.….S. Patent No. 8,574,324; U.S. Patent No. 8,658,115;
U.S. Patent No. 8,703,081; U.S. Patent No. |
External link to document |
2019-06-17 |
168 |
Redacted Document |
. D.I. # 135, Pl. Opp. Br. 203‒09, 217‒20.
That the ’692 Patent is not limited to coal-fired power… and the patent owner’s own statement defining
“flue gas” in the context of the ’692 Patent (“Accordingly…sentence in the patent that it cites; (iii) contradicted by
the plain text of the patent itself; and (iv…his ’282 Patent, which issued in 1998. See D.I. # 135, Pl. Opp. Br. 90–
91. But the ’282 Patent described…Ex. 52, ’282 Patent
at 1:8‒11 (emphasis added).
Other statements in that patent are consistent |
External link to document |