Litigation Details for Meda Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (D. Del. 2015)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Meda Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (D. Del. 2015)
| Docket | ⤷ Try a Trial | Date Filed | 2015-09-08 |
| Court | District Court, D. Delaware | Date Terminated | 2017-07-28 |
| Cause | 35:0145 | Assigned To | Leonard Philip Stark |
| Jury Demand | None | Referred To | |
| Parties | MEDA PHARMACEUTICALS INC. | ||
| Patents | 6,759,398; 7,629,335; 8,071,073; 8,163,723; 8,168,620; 9,259,428 | ||
| Attorneys | Steven J. Balick | ||
| Firms | Shaw Keller LLP, I.M. Pei Building | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Meda Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
The small molecule drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , and ⤷ Try a Trial .
Biologic Drugs cited in Meda Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
The biologic drug covered by the patents cited in this case is ⤷ Try a Trial .
Details for Meda Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (D. Del. 2015)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-11-10 | 101 | Exhibit A | ’428 Patent PH U.S. Patent No. 6,759,398 (see, e.g., Col. …00001339. U.S. Patent No. 6,759,398 (see, e.g., Col. … The ’620, 723, and ’428 patents arise from the same patent family and share substantially similar… ’723, and ’428 patents contain many of the same references. For citations to patents, the parties incorporate… MEDA_TEVA_00000733 (Non-Patent U.S. Patent No. 5,889,015 (see, e.g., Col. | External link to document |
| 2016-11-13 | 104 | ("CoC") for U.S. Patent No. 9,259,428 ('" 428 patent") into this case. (D.I…inadvertent typographical errors" in the '428 patent. (D.I. 62 at 1) "On May 3, 2016, the PTO issued…requested Certificate of Correction for the '428 patent." (Id.) Plaintiffs explain that thereafter…indefiniteness arguments regarding claim 28 of '_428 patent, arguments that would be affected by introduction…litigating the uncorrected version of the '428 patent. (See D.I. 65 at 5) (discussing litigation that | External link to document | |
| 2016-12-06 | 113 | of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,163,723; 8,168,620; and 9,259,428. With respect to the '428 patent, the PTO… claims 28-30 of the '428 patent, which, in the uncorrected patent, contain a typographical error…addressing construction of claims 28-30 of the '428 patent, within one week of the date of this order. Signed…additional exhibits are documents from the '428 patent's prosecution history, including a listing…in the,context of claims 28-30 of the '428 patent. 3. D~fendant opposes Plaintiffs | External link to document | |
| 2017-08-29 | 123 | the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 8,163,723; 8,168,620. (etg) (…2015 28 July 2017 1:15-cv-00785 830 Patent None District Court, D. Delaware | External link to document | |
| >Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |
