Litigation Details for Kove IO, Inc. v. Amazon Web Services, Inc. (N.D. Ill. 2018)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Kove IO, Inc. v. Amazon Web Services, Inc. (N.D. Ill. 2018)
Docket | ⤷ Try a Trial | Date Filed | 2018-12-12 |
Court | District Court, N.D. Illinois | Date Terminated | |
Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | Rebecca R. Pallmeyer |
Jury Demand | Both | Referred To | |
Parties | AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC.; KOVE IO, INC. | ||
Patents | 10,022,474; 10,029,011; 10,029,015; 10,039,800; 6,028,222; 6,462,017; 6,465,006; 6,814,978; 7,014,098; 7,198,581; 7,674,014; 8,344,011; 8,445,003; 8,507,007; 8,568,233; 9,000,002; 9,000,011; 9,024,096; 9,074,005; 9,101,591; 9,101,592; 9,101,810; 9,415,008; 9,534,008; 9,587,003; 9,669,008 | ||
Attorneys | Adam Unikowsky; Christine E Lehman; Courtland Reichman; Holly Hannah Campbell; Jaime Francisco Cardenas-Navia; Jennifer Estremera; Joachim Steinberg; Kate Falkenstien; Khue Hoang; Michael G Flanigan; Michael Glenn Babbitt; Michael Thomas Werner; Michael Walton Marvin; Phillip Lee; Rahul Sarkar; Renato T. Mariotti; Sarah Jorgensen; Shawna L Ballard; Terri Lynn Mascherin; Timothy Joseph Barron; Wesley White | ||
Firms | Jenner & Block LLP; Jenner & Block, LLP; Reichman Jorgensen LLP; Thompson Coburn LLP | ||
Link to Docket | External link to docket |
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Kove IO, Inc. v. Amazon Web Services, Inc.
Biologic Drugs cited in Kove IO, Inc. v. Amazon Web Services, Inc.
The biologic drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , and ⤷ Try a Trial .
Details for Kove IO, Inc. v. Amazon Web Services, Inc. (N.D. Ill. 2018)
Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
---|---|---|---|---|
2020-05-01 | 132 | (“AWS”) of infringing U.S. Patent Nos. 7,233,978, 7,103,640, and 7,814,170. Pursuant to Federal Rule…’640 patent application—the ’978 patent is not a continuation of the ’640 patent. Claims 1, 3, 6, 10,…claim 18 of the ’640 patent and claim 6 of the ’170 patent. Claim 1 of the ’978 patent recites a “system …the ’978 patent is obvious in view of claim 18 of the ’640 patent and claim 6 of the ’170 patent. Claim…claim 18 of the ’640 patent and claim 6 of the ’170 patent. Claim 31 of the ’978 patent recites a “system | External link to document | |
2020-10-13 | 221 | Appendix Part 2 | A20 5,781,725 07/14/98 SAITO A21 5,774,670 … A20 5,781,725 07/14/98 SAITO A21 5,774,670 … ..... A20 5,781,725 07/14/98 SAITO A21 5,… -. A20 5,781,725 07/14/98 SAITO ..l I…Division for issuance of a patent. The patent term adjustment indicated on the patent (as shown on the Issue | External link to document |
2021-09-09 | 401 | Exhibit F | ;2<>5B58131 ?@41@-.81.18;C-??19.8102>;9@415:-8'>-:?/>5<@I'> J?4;C?@41 …December 2018 10 April 2024 1:18-cv-08175 Patent Both District Court, N.D. Illinois | External link to document |
2023-10-05 | 690 | Exhibit 48 | Report at ¶ 109, FNs 134 and 139. 18 6/28/222 ’978 patent reexam Non-Final Office Action at 1, 35-…90/019,034 (“9/28/22 ’978 patent reexam response”). 11 8/4/22 ’640 patent reexam response at 23-24 …14 8/4/22 ’640 patent reexam response at 23-24. 15 Id. 16 8/11/22 ’170 patent reexam response …18; see also Karger ’420 patent at 3:23-50. 6:29-41, 10:22-34 and ’618 patent at 3:18-44, 6:21-33, 10:… ’640 Patent 374. Kove asserts claims 17, 18, and 24 of the ’640 patent. Claims 17 | External link to document |
2023-11-15 | 709 | Exhibit K51 (PUBLIC) | :15 765:6 separately 567:10,22 474:2,3 475:5 584:13,21 selected 781… 8 submitted to the patent office about the 9 patents-in-suit to prepare for your …21 in the '978 patent, which also is 10 figure in the other patents-in-suit, we see an …the claims in the earlier patent 12 and the claim in the later patent to identify any 13 …statements to the patent office that 15 Claims 1, 6 and 15 of the '170 patent require a 16 | External link to document |
>Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |