Litigation Details for Huawei Technologies, Co, Ltd v. Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd. (N.D. Cal. 2016)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Huawei Technologies, Co, Ltd v. Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd. (N.D. Cal. 2016)
| Docket | ⤷ Try a Trial | Date Filed | 2016-05-24 |
| Court | District Court, N.D. California | Date Terminated | 2019-03-25 |
| Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | William Horsley Orrick III |
| Jury Demand | Both | Referred To | Joseph Spero |
| Parties | HISILICON TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.; HUAWEI DEVICE USA INC.; HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC; HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES, CO, LTD; NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS US LLC; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO, LTD.; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC; SAMSUNG RESEARCH AMERICA; T-MOBILE US, INC. | ||
| Patents | 6,002,008; 8,644,239; 9,000,011; RE44,186; RE44,599; RE44,681; RE44,733; RE44,872 | ||
| Attorneys | Alan Lee Whitehurst; Alan Lee Whitehurst ,; Benjamin Laban Singer; Brian E Mack; Carl Gunnar Anderson; Charles Kramer Verhoeven; Cole Daniel Malmberg; Cory D. Szczepanik; Cory David Szczepanik; Curt Holbreich; Daryl M. Crone; David Andrew Perlson; David Giardina; David LeRay; David T. Pritikin; Deepa Acharya; Douglas I. Lewis; Ellen S. Robbins; Evan N. Budaj; Iman Lordgooei; Irene Inkyu Yang; Jared Weston Newton; Jocelyn Ma; John P. Wisse; John Weatherby McBride; Kevin Hardy; Kevin Joseph O'Brien; Kevin P.B. Johnson; Leif E. Peterson , II; Marissa R. Ducca; Marissa R. Ducca ,; Mark Thomas Gray; Melissa J Baily; Michael J. Bettinger; Nathan A. Greenblatt; Nathaniel C. Love; Philip Charles Sternhell; Rachel R. Davidson; Rafik Paul Zeineddin; Raquel Catalina Rodriguez; Ray R. Zado; Russell E. Cass; Ryan W. Koppelman; Sam Stephen Stake; Samuel Bryant Davidoff; Theresa H Nguyen; Thomas D. Pease; Victoria F. Maroulis | ||
| Firms | Akerman LLP; Alston & Bird LLP; Crone Hawxhurst LLP; Jared Weston Newton; Kevin Hardy; Perkins Coie LLP; Quinn Emanuel; Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullian LLP; Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan; Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP; Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP; Quinn Emanuel Urquhart and Sullivan LLP; Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges L; Quinn Emmanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP; Quinn Emmanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LP; Sidley Austin LLP; Sidley Austin, LLP; Singer Bea LLP; Singer Cashman LLP; Williams & Connolly LLP; WilmerHale; Zeineddin PLLC | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Huawei Technologies, Co, Ltd v. Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd.
The small molecule drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , and ⤷ Try a Trial .
Biologic Drugs cited in Huawei Technologies, Co, Ltd v. Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd.
The biologic drug covered by the patents cited in this case is ⤷ Try a Trial .
Details for Huawei Technologies, Co, Ltd v. Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd. (N.D. Cal. 2016)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-08-31 | 168 | Order | ’166 patent”); 8,812,848; 8,644,239 (“the ’239 patent”); 8,885,587; 8,885,583; 8,639,246…27 ’246 patent”); 8,412,197 (“the ’197 patent”); 8,996,003; and 8,724,613 (“the ’613 patent”). …26 Huawei has asserted U.S. Patent Nos. 8,369,278 (“the ’278 patent”); 8,416,892; 8,483,166 (“the …Samsung has asserted U.S. Patent Nos. 8,228,827, 8,315,195 (“the ’195 patent”), RE44,105, …8,457,588 (“the ’588 patent”), 8,509,350, 9,113,419, 8,619,726 (“the ’726 patent”), 8,761,130 | External link to document |
| 2017-10-03 | 191 | Writ Issued | U.S. Patent Nos. 8,369,278; 8,416,892; 8,483,166; 8,812,848; 8,644,239; 8,885,587; 8,885,583; 8,639,246;…standard-essential patents (“SEPS”). In addition, Huawei alleged that Samsung infringes eleven of its patents: U.S.…alleged that Huawei infringes nine of its patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 8,228,827; 8,315,195; RE44,105; 8,…that they infringe the patents asserted against them and contend that the patents asserted against them…art exists that anticipates the patented claims or renders the patented claims obvious. Huawei has alleged | External link to document |
| 2018-06-26 | 318 | Huawei's Updated Election of Asserted Claims and Accused Products (REDACTE | • U.S. Patent 8,416,892, claims 1, 10 9 • U.S. Patent 8,644,239, claims 7, 18 10…currently asserted 5 patents to 4, narrows its currently asserted patent claims to no more than 10…10 • U.S. Patent 8,885,587, claims 3, 9 11 • U.S. Patent 8,724,613, claims 1, 5 12…purposes of assessing 17 infringement of Huawei’s patents. Therefore, provided that the parties enter or … 25 March 2019 3:16-cv-02787-WHO 830 Patent Both District Court, N.D. California | External link to document |
| >Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |
