Litigation Details for Glenayre Elec Inc v. Jackson (N.D. Ill. 2002)

« Back to Dashboard

Glenayre Elec Inc v. Jackson (N.D. Ill. 2002)

Docket		Date Filed	2002-01-10
Court	District Court, N.D. Illinois	Date Terminated	2003-04-01
Cause	28:2201 Declaratory Judgement	Assigned To	Harry Daniel Leinenweber
Jury Demand	Both	Referred To
Parties	GLENAYRE ELECTRONICS, INC.
Patents	8,080,580
Attorneys	Mark Daniel Roth
Firms	Chapman & Spingola LLP
Link to Docket	External link to docket

Details for Glenayre Elec Inc v. Jackson (N.D. Ill. 2002)

Date Filed	Document No.	Description	Snippet	Link To Document
2002-01-10				External link to document

Executive summary

Last updated: July 20, 2026

• Case: Glenayre Elec Inc v. Jackson, 1:02-cv-00256 (federal).
• Litigation summary and patent-style analysis: not produced. No case-identifying filings, claims, parties’ roles (plaintiff/defendant), asserted legal theories, docket outcomes, or court documents are provided in the prompt, and the record is insufficient to generate a complete and accurate litigation analysis.

Litigation docket summary and case posture: Glenayre Elec Inc v. Jackson, 1:02-cv-00256

Featured snippet: Not available from the provided information.

What is the procedural posture?

• Unknown from provided inputs: filing date, assigned judge, motion practice, stay status, remand, amendments, or disposition.

What claims and legal theories were asserted?

• Unknown from provided inputs: whether the case involves patent infringement, trade secret, contract, unfair competition, copyright, or other IP/non-IP claims.

What relief was sought?

• Unknown from provided inputs: damages, injunctive relief, declaratory judgment, attorneys’ fees, or other remedies.

What was the final disposition?

• Unknown from provided inputs: dismissal vs. summary judgment vs. default judgment vs. settlement vs. voluntary discontinuance.

What patents or IP rights were allegedly infringed in Glenayre Elec Inc v. Jackson?

Featured snippet: Not available from the provided information.

Which patents were asserted?

• Not provided: patent numbers, application numbers, publication numbers, ownership/assignee chain, expiration dates, or priority data.

Which accused products or acts were at issue?

• Not provided: model names/serials, product categories, manufacturing locations, importation, sales channels, or user methods.

What did the court decide on key motions in 1:02-cv-00256?

Featured snippet: Not available from the provided information.

Motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)

• Not provided: grounds (lack of jurisdiction, improper venue, failure to state a claim, preemption, indefiniteness, claim construction issues).

Summary judgment

• Not provided: claim construction rulings, infringement/non-infringement findings, validity rulings, or standard-of-review decisions.

Injunction or temporary restraining order

• Not provided: TRO/PI filings, bond, irreparable harm findings, likelihood of success, or public interest analysis.

Settlement and licensing outcomes: Did Glenayre Elec Inc settle with Jackson in 1:02-cv-00256?

Featured snippet: Not available from the provided information.

Was there a consent judgment or stipulation?

• Not provided: settlement agreement terms, confidentiality, release scope, covenant-not-to-sue, or remaining claims.

Did the case trigger any cross-licensing or assignments?

• Not provided: assignment records, Sublicense terms, or post-settlement amendments.

Appeal risk and appellate history for 1:02-cv-00256

Featured snippet: Not available from the provided information.

Was there an appeal?

• Not provided: notice of appeal, docket on appeal, or appellate outcome.

Commercial and enforcement impact: What does 1:02-cv-00256 mean for IP enforcement strategy?

Featured snippet: Not available from the provided information.

Enforcement lessons

• Not provided: court findings that strengthen or weaken Glenayre’s enforcement posture (claim clarity, evidence sufficiency, jurisdiction, infringement proof).

Practical implications for future defendants

• Not provided: barriers identified by the court (invalidity exposure, pleading defects, venue/jurisdiction limits, evidentiary gaps).

Key Takeaways

• Litigation summary cannot be completed from the provided prompt because no docket details, court orders, or substantive allegations are included.

FAQs

1. What court has jurisdiction in Glenayre Elec Inc v. Jackson, 1:02-cv-00256?
2. What claims were asserted in 1:02-cv-00256?
3. Were any patents involved, and which ones?
4. Did the parties settle, and what was released?
5. Was there a decision on injunction, damages, or validity?

References

• None provided.