0000-00-00 |
|
|
|
External link to document |
2017-04-28 |
1 |
Complaint |
United States
Patent No. 7,405,203, United States Patent No. 7,579,321, and United States Patent No.
7,799,761…Certificate, No. US 7,405,203 C1
(collectively, “the ’203 patent”). The ’203 patent bears the title, “…Application”), which matured into United States Patent No. 7,405,203, and U.S.
Application No. 10/706,100 (“… issued United States Patent No. 7,579,321 (“the
’321 patent”). The ’321 patent bears the title, “Pharmaceutical… issued United States Patent No. 7,799,761 (“the
’761 patent”). The ’761 patent bears the title, “Pharmaceutical |
External link to document |
2018-06-28 |
101 |
Answer to Amended Complaint |
, United States Patent No. 7,405,203 (the “’203 patent”); 7,579,321
(the “’321 patent”); and 7,799,761…United States Patent
Nos. 7,405,203 (the “’203 patent”), and 7,579,321 (the “’321 patent”) (collectively… (INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,405,203)
55. Counterclaimants incorporate…the ’203 patent on April 12, 2011 by issuing Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate
No. US 7,405,203 C1.
… (WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,405,203)
70. Counterclaimants incorporate |
External link to document |
2018-07-19 |
115 |
Answer to Counterclaim |
United States Patent Nos. 7,405,203 (“the ’203 patent”) and 7,579,321 (“the ’321 patent”).
9. … (INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,405,203)
55. Ferring incorporates by… (WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,405,203)
70. Ferring incorporates by…Certificate No. US 7,405,203 C1 on April
12, 2011. Ferring states that the claims of the ’203 patent are invalid…issued Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate No. US 7,405,203 C1 on April
12, 2011. Ferring denies the remaining |
External link to document |
2017-06-09 |
12 |
Response/Reply - Miscellaneous |
joint inventor of two patents assigned to Ferring -- U.S. Patent Nos. 7,560,429
and 7,947,654 (collectively…Defendants’ patents -- U.S. Patent Nos. 7,405,203; 7,579,321; and 7,799,761 (collectively, “the
patents in suit…Fein’s three patents in suit. In that regard, Ferring contended that Dr.
Fein’s patents included “significant…was the rightful owner of the three patents in suit; (2) those patents include “significant” and
“inventive…the patents in suit, Ferring filed its DJ complaint in this Court
asserting now that the patents in suit |
External link to document |