Litigation Details for Blazer v. Chrisman Mill Farms LLC (E.D. Ky. 2017)

✉ Email this page to a colleague

Docket	⤷ Try a Trial	Date Filed	2017-10-30
Court	District Court, E.D. Kentucky	Date Terminated
Cause	35:271 Patent Infringement	Assigned To	Danny C. Reeves
Jury Demand	Both	Referred To	Matthew A. Stinnett
Parties	BRIAN ROBERT BLAZER; CHRISMAN MILL FARMS, LLC
Patents	10,149,843; 10,251,894; 10,375,956; 10,405,907; 10,611,775; 10,611,821; 10,611,844; 10,611,849; 10,611,989; 10,624,875; 6,503,894; 6,786,841; 6,806,256; 6,986,894; 7,685,959; 7,686,786; 7,775,914; 7,790,429; 7,806,777; 7,815,907; 7,829,659; 7,959,920; 7,989,677; 8,268,806; 8,282,914; 8,499,757; 8,672,898; 8,685,920; 8,802,624; 8,821,870; 8,870,847; 8,920,792; 8,956,611; 8,956,819; 8,979,821; 8,986,686; 9,351,910; 9,451,914; 9,499,844; 9,775,844; 9,775,849; 9,815,835; 9,815,894; 9,907,775; 9,907,802; 9,907,849; 9,914,757; 9,914,802; 9,956,282; RE46,209; RE46,375
Attorneys	Brenen G Ely; James M. Francis; Joseph J. Gleason; Olen Lee York , III; Steven M Brom
Firms	Bachus & Brom LLC; Ely & Isenberg LLC; Francis Law Firm; Gleason Law, LLC; York Law LLC
Link to Docket	External link to docket

Subscribe to access the full database, or Try a Trial
Date Filed	Document No.	Description	Snippet	Link To Document
2020-04-17	108		trap infringes claims 1-4, 7-8, 10, 13-17, and 20-21 of the patent. DE 67 (Mem. Op. & Order)…several Patent elements are so-called “means-plus-function” claims under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6.10 This …supersedes the ‘624 Patent, as the “Patent” for claim construction purposes. The Patent recites two independent…Inc. v. Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC, 134 S. Ct. 843, 849 (2014). Notably, infringement requires…necessary.” Digital Biometrics, Inc. v. Identix, Inc., 149 F.3d 1335, 1344 (Fed. Cir. 1998). Indeed, “[r]elying	External link to document
2018-01-02	67	Memorandum Opinion & Order	Record Nos. 7, 8, 9] The ’624 Patent was reissued as RE46,421 (“RE46421”) on June 6, 2017. [Record… Blazer owns U.S. Patent No. 8,375,624 (“the ’624 Patent) which covers an insect trap meant… “Patent infringement is a two-step inquiry. First, the court must construe the asserted patent claims…that unknown to it allegedly infringed Blazer’s patent. [Record No. 57, p. 3] In light of the allegations…infringement, CMF obtained a license under the ’624 Patent and began selling traps under the license on December	External link to document
>Date Filed	>Document No.	>Description	>Snippet	>Link To Document