Litigation Details for Biofer S.p.A. v. Vifor (International) AG. (E.D.N.Y 2022)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Biofer S.p.A. v. Vifor (International) AG. (E.D.N.Y 2022)
Docket | ⤷ Try a Trial | Date Filed | 2022-04-15 |
Court | District Court, E.D. New York | Date Terminated | |
Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | Ann Marie Donnelly |
Jury Demand | Plaintiff | Referred To | Sanket J. Bulsara |
Patents | 7,612,109; 7,754,702; 8,895,612; 9,000,002; 9,000,021; 9,376,505 | ||
Firms | Greenberg Traurig LLP, Ip Department | ||
Link to Docket | External link to docket |
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Biofer S.p.A. v. Vifor (International) AG.
Biologic Drugs cited in Biofer S.p.A. v. Vifor (International) AG.
Details for Biofer S.p.A. v. Vifor (International) AG. (E.D.N.Y 2022)
Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
---|---|---|---|---|
2024-03-29 | 139 | Order(Other) | but two claim terms: (1) “pH between 7.0 and 9.0,” and (2) “said hypochlorite being added in stoichiometric…) AG. (“Vifor”) infringed U.S. Patent No. 8,759,320 (the “’320 Patent”), which describes a process used…date of the patent application” would understand them “in the context of the entire patent.” Id. (quoting…, and has patented this process for making such sugars. On June 24, 2014, the ’320 patent, titled “Process…Egidio Marchi. (’320 Patent at [54], [75]). Biofer was the assignee on the patent. (Id. at [73]). Biofer | External link to document |
2023-06-12 | 45 | Trial Brief | Limitation - “pH between 7.0 and 9.0” ..................................... 21 …language of United States Patent No. 8,759,320 (“the ’320 patent” or “Asserted Patent”) (Ex. 1 1). In support…of the ’320 patent are dependent claims. Patents are issued as a result of a patent application…for a patent or a patent owner, as the case may be, may commit to a particular meaning for a patent term…States Patent Office (“USPTO”) leading to allowance of the application as an issued U.S. patent (“the | External link to document |
2023-09-15 | 90 | Amended Complaint | United States Patent Nos. 7,612,109 (“the ’109 Patent”); 7,754,702 (“the ’702 Patent”); 8,895,612 (“…of New York and is the licensee of U.S. Patent No. 7,612,109.” (Id.) In Vifor’s PTE Request, Vifor further…United States Patent Nos. 8,759,320 (“the ’320 Patent” or “the Asserted Patent”) under the Patent Laws of …the ’109 Patent also appear in the ’505 Patent and ’321 Patent, and citations to the ’109 Patent are representative…(“the ’612 Patent”); 9,376,505 (“the ’505 Patent”), and 11,123,321 (“the ’321 Patent”) (collectively, | External link to document |
>Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |