2020-05-01 |
1 |
|
infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,809,307 (the “’307 Patent”) and
10,478,502 (the “’502 Patent”) (collectively…for infringement of the Patents-In-Suit. This action arises under the
Patent Laws of the United States… THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT
The ’307 Patent
18. …the ’307 Patent
is attached as Exhibit A.
19. The named inventors of the ’307 Patent are Arturo… ’307 Patent as November 2,
2031.
21. Bausch Ireland is the assignee of the ’307 Patent.
|
External link to document |
2022-05-20 |
144 |
Order on Motion for Summary Judgment |
Bausch owns U.S. Patent Nos. 10,251,895 (“the ’895 patent”) and 10,426,787 (the “’787 patent,”
and together…States Patent Application No. 15/173,961 ultimately issued as the ’895 patent.
United States Patent Application…together with the ’895 patent, the “Combination Patents”). For the reasons that follow,
Plaintiffs’ motion…903,785 ultimately issued as the ’787 patent. The
Combination Patents have the same inventors, both claim…8362
Patent Application No. 15/903,785, which was filed on June 18, 2015, and the two patents have
|
External link to document |
2022-09-21 |
196 |
Order on Motion in Limine AND Order on Motion in Limine AND Order on Motion in Limine AND Order on Motion in Limine AND Order on Motion in Limine AND Order on Motion in Limine |
Bausch owns U.S. Patent Nos.
10,251,895 (“the ’895 patent”), 10,426,787 (“the ’787 patent,” and together…together with the ’895 patent,
the “Combination Patents”), 8,809,307 (“the ’307 patent”) and 10,478,502 (…reduction . . .” (Claim 1 of the ‘787 patent; claim 1 of the ‘895 patent.)
The language of the relevant…produces” test has a foundation in either the patents or patent law; this Court rejects Defendants’
argument…starring role in the patent specifications, as IDP-118 has in the Combination Patents. There is
nothing |
External link to document |
2022-09-26 |
199 |
Stipulation and Order |
claims of two patents Bausch has asserted in this
Action, U.S. Patent Nos. 10,251,895 and 10,426,787…regarding the
Asserted Claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 10,251,895 and 10,426,787 to further narrow the disputed…infringement of the Asserted Claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 10,251,895 and
10,426,787;
NOW THEREFORE…Padagis infringed claims 3 and 6 of
U.S. Patent No. 10,251,895, and claims 4, 5, and 7 of U.S. Pat. No.…collectively, the
“Asserted Claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 10,251,895 and 10,426,787”) under 35 U.S.C. § 271( |
External link to document |