You’re using a public version of DrugPatentWatch with 5 free searches available | Register to unlock more free searches. CREATE FREE ACCOUNT

Last Updated: April 18, 2024

Litigation Details for Antares Pharma Inc. v. Medac Pharma Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2014)


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Small Molecule Drugs cited in Antares Pharma Inc. v. Medac Pharma Inc.
The small molecule drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , ⤷  Try a Trial , and ⤷  Try a Trial .

Details for Antares Pharma Inc. v. Medac Pharma Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2014)

Date Filed Document No. Description Snippet Link To Document
2014-07-25 20 IJ3, filed on Feb. 9, 2001, now PaL No. 6,746,429, which is a continuation of appli- …Furthermore, as auto-injectors operate like Pat. No. 6,746,429, which is a continuation of International …Antares patents, though this appeal focuses on one—RE 44,846 (“the ‘846 patent”). 1 The ‘846 patent “is …the two patents support two patentably distinct inventions. During prosecution of the ‘015 patent, the …015 patent. But that is not what happened. During the prosecution of the ‘846 patent, the Patent Office External link to document
2014-12-16 63 . It is the assign- ee of U.S. Patent No. 7,776,015 (“the ’015 patent”), which issued on August 17, …requirement of the 1870 Patent Act, the Court explained that reissued patents could routinely include…which was disclosed in an original patent: “To hold that a patent can never be reissued for an enlarged…Indeed, the original patent requirement has always been that claims in a reissue patent must find support…was whether the reissue patent was for the same invention as the original patent.” Id. at 1323. Hounsfield External link to document
2015-02-04 67 251 ‘015 patent U.S. Patent No. 7,776,015846 patent or U.S. Patent No. RE44,846… The original patent at issue here is the ‘015 patent. The original ‘015 patent describes the “invention…that the ‘846 reissue patent is invalid because it violates the original patent requirement of 35 U.S.C…concluding that ‘846 reissue patent is invalid for violating the original patent requirement, the Panel focused…explained that the original patent requirement is met only if “the original patent specification fully describes External link to document
>Date Filed >Document No. >Description >Snippet >Link To Document

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.