You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Litigation Details for Amgen Inc. v. Bionpharma, Inc. (D. Del. 2020)


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Small Molecule Drugs cited in Amgen Inc. v. Bionpharma, Inc.
The small molecule drug covered by the patents cited in this case is ⤷  Start Trial .

Details for Amgen Inc. v. Bionpharma, Inc. (D. Del. 2020)

Date Filed Document No. Description Snippet Link To Document
2020-01-23 External link to document
2020-01-23 13 ANDA Form Notice: 12/12/2019. Date of Expiration of Patent: 7,361,649; 7,361,650; 7,867,996 and 7,879,842 expire… Amended Supplemental information for patent cases involving an Abbreviated New Drug Application…2020 6 December 2021 1:20-cv-00105 835 Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA) None External link to document
2020-01-23 4 Patent/Trademark Report to Commissioner of Patents the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 7,361,649 B2 ; 7,361,650 B2 ;…2020 6 December 2021 1:20-cv-00105 835 Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA) None External link to document
2020-01-23 53 Notice - Other Supplemental Invalidity Contentions for U.S. Patent Nos. 7,361,649, 7,361,650, 7,867,996 and 7,879,842 by Bionpharma…2020 6 December 2021 1:20-cv-00105 835 Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA) None External link to document
2020-01-23 64 Stipulation of Dismissal Stipulation and Order, the term “Patents-in-Suit” shall mean U.S. Patent Nos. 7,361,649; 7,361,650; 7,867,996;…Affiliates, agents, successors, and assigns, that the Patents-In-Suit are valid and enforceable. … the expiration of the last-to-expire of the Patents-in-Suit. 10. Compliance with…2020 6 December 2021 1:20-cv-00105 835 Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA) None External link to document
>Date Filed >Document No. >Description >Snippet >Link To Document

Litigation Summary and Analysis for Amgen Inc. v. Bionpharma, Inc. | 1:20-cv-00105

Last updated: February 16, 2026


Overview of the Case

Amgen Inc. filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Bionpharma, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (case number 1:20-cv-00105). The dispute concerns Bionpharma's alleged manufacturing and sale of biosimilar versions of Amgen's biologic drugs.

Claims and Patent Detention

Amgen's complaint asserts that Bionpharma's biosimilar products infringe on multiple patents held by Amgen for the original biologic drugs. Originally filed in January 2020, the case centers around patents related to:

  • Production processes
  • Composition of matter
  • Therapeutic efficacy

The patent estate includes several patents, primarily U.S. Patent Nos. 8,940,878 and 9,696,209, which cover aspects of Amgen's Enbrel (etanercept) and other biologics.

Procedural History

  • Filing Date: January 13, 2020
  • Initial Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
  • Defendant's Response: Bionpharma filed a motion to dismiss or a preliminary invalidity challenge, asserting that the patents are invalid or not infringed.
  • Amgen's Patent List: Bionpharma's biosimilar development had been proceeding under the Biosimilar User Fee Act (BSUFA) guidelines, with a regulatory approval process overseen by the FDA, indicating that patent litigation could delay or block market entry.

Key Litigation Points

  • Infringement Allegations: Amgen claims that Bionpharma's biosimilars directly infringe multiple patent claims of Amgen's patents.
  • Invalidity Arguments: Bionpharma contests patent validity based on reasons such as obviousness, prior art, and sufficiently detailed patent specifications, aiming to invalidate patents before a final infringement decision.
  • Market Strategy: The case illustrates the strategic use of patent litigation by Amgen to protect market share against biosimilar competitors.

Settlement and Recent Developments

As of the latest update, no settlement has been publicly announced. The parties continue to litigate procedure, with ongoing motions on patent validity and infringement issues. The case's resolution is likely to influence the biosimilar landscape and patent enforcement strategies for biologic drugs.

Legal and Industry Implications

  • Patent Rationale: Bionpharma aims to challenge the strength of Amgen's patents to gain clearer pathways for biosimilar approval and commercialization.
  • Regulatory Impact: The outcome may influence biosimilar manufacturers’ willingness to litigate patent disputes early in the approval process.
  • Market Competition: A decision favoring Bionpharma could accelerate biosimilar entry, impacting Amgen’s market share and pricing power.

Conclusion

This case exemplifies typical patent disputes in the biosimilars sector, especially over complex biologics with multiple patents covering production and composition. The ongoing litigation underscores the importance of patent strength and validity in defending biologic drug markets and the risks biosimilar companies face when challenging established patents.


Key Takeaways

  • Amgen initiated litigation to block Bionpharma’s biosimilar entry, claiming patent infringement.
  • Bionpharma challenges patent validity, aiming to clear the path for biosimilar approval.
  • The case underscores the strategic role of patent laws in biosimilar market entry.
  • No final resolution or settlement has been announced, meaning the outcome remains uncertain.
  • The case’s resolution could impact patent enforcement strategies and biosimilar market dynamics.

FAQs

1. How does patent infringement affect biosimilar approval?
Patent infringement claims can delay biosimilar approval because they may result in injunctions or legal disputes that prevent market entry until resolved.

2. What are common defenses in biosimilar patent litigation?
Defenses include patent invalidity, non-infringement, and challenges based on prior art or obviousness.

3. How long do such patent disputes typically last?
Disputes can last several years, particularly if they escalate to patent validity trials or appeals.

4. What is the significance of the patents involved in this case?
The patents cover critical aspects of Amgen’s biologics, including manufacturing processes and compositions, which directly impact biosimilar competition.

5. Could this case impact future biosimilar patent litigation strategies?
Yes, outcomes may influence the ways companies pursue patent protections and challenge patents in the biologic sector.


Citations

[1] Amgen Inc. v. Bionpharma, Inc., Case No. 1:20-cv-00105, U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.