Last Updated: June 27, 2026

Litigation Details for ASTRAZENECA AB v. ACTAVIS LABORATORIES FL, INC. (D.N.J. 2014)


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Small Molecule Drugs cited in ASTRAZENECA AB v. ACTAVIS LABORATORIES FL, INC.
The small molecule drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷  Start Trial , ⤷  Start Trial , and ⤷  Start Trial .

Litigation Summary and Analysis: AstraZeneca AB v. Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc. (D.N.J. Case No. 3:14-cv-07870)

Last updated: June 12, 2026

No substantive case-specific litigation record content (claims asserted, asserted patents and Orange Book ties, FDA/NDA/ANDA details, procedural posture, claim construction, final judgment, settlement terms, or injunction/launch outcomes) was provided for AstraZeneca AB v. Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc., 3:14-cv-07870. Without those inputs, a complete and accurate litigation summary cannot be produced.

What patents were asserted in AstraZeneca AB v. Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc. (3:14-cv-07870)?

What Paragraph IV ANDA challenge triggered the AstraZeneca v. Actavis case?

What was the court’s procedural posture in 3:14-cv-07870 (motions, stays, Markman)?

Did the case end in settlement, dismissal, or final judgment?

What did the settlement require (launch dates, payment, stipulations, injunction terms)?

How did claim scope and construction affect infringement and validity arguments?

What generic entry risks existed for Actavis if the case settled or was dismissed?

What is the Orange Book status for the AstraZeneca product involved in 3:14-cv-07870?

What companies competed with Actavis in the same ANDA/patent cluster?

How does this dispute compare with other AstraZeneca AB patent litigations vs generics?

Key Takeaways

FAQs

  1. What does case number 3:14-cv-07870 typically correspond to in Hatch-Waxman litigation?
  2. How do courts in the District of New Jersey usually handle stays under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(4) in ANDA patent cases?
  3. What indicators in dockets signal settlement versus adjudication in AstraZeneca AB v. Actavis-type cases?
  4. How should a patent estate’s expiration schedule be mapped to ANDA readiness for generic launch planning?
  5. What Orange Book listing patterns predict higher probability of launch-delay settlements?

References

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.