Litigation Details for United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (E.D. Tex. 2018)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (E.D. Tex. 2018)
Docket | ⤷ Try a Trial | Date Filed | 2018-06-07 |
Court | District Court, E.D. Texas | Date Terminated | 2019-11-11 |
Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | James Rodney Gilstrap |
Jury Demand | Both | Referred To | |
Patents | 10,029,015; 10,030,051; 10,030,059; 10,036,054; 10,046,031; 10,046,056; 6,011,049; 8,058,052; 9,005,056; 9,018,017; 9,020,056; 9,024,007; 9,028,005; 9,035,031; 9,035,033; 9,040,034; 9,040,039; 9,040,049; 9,056,052 | ||
Link to Docket | External link to docket |
Small Molecule Drugs cited in United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Biologic Drugs cited in United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
The biologic drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , and ⤷ Try a Trial .
Details for United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (E.D. Tex. 2018)
Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
---|---|---|---|---|
2019-11-06 | 326 | Transcript | up together in 10:36:53 21 Daingerfield. 10:36:54 22 MR. BUNT: I told y'all…gentlemen, this is a 09:37:42 17 patent case arising under the patent laws of the United 09:37:45 18…two U.S. patents that are 10:10:41 7 owned by my client, USAA. And these patents relate to… 10:11:14 15 patented technology in their own product. And in patent 10:11:18 16 cases… morning about -- from the patent 10:12:21 10 jury video about patents and how those are pieces of | External link to document |
2019-11-06 | 328 | Transcript | : Counsel, there's no need for you to 10:30:51 6 characterize before the jury how you perceive… '571 patent. 09:22:04 8 Q. Now, what did you look at in the '090 patent? 09:22:08 …this patent. 09:22:33 15 Q. And why don't you describe Claim 1 of the '090 patent 09:… 17 patent? 09:24:06 18 A. I'm saying that the evidence in the '571 patent is 09:…called out in the patent 09:30:41 4 specification in the example system that the patent 09:30:44 | External link to document |
2019-11-06 | 330 | Transcript | x27;d ask that you show me in Exhibit 162 where 10:30:59 6 they asked. 10:31:04 7 A. They&…when the patents -- the first patent in 08:58:40 25 this case to issue, the '571 patent, issued…capture process that USAA has patented in the 09:01:41 14 '571 patent? 09:01:41 15 A. I understand…there's no patent 09:02:15 4 protection in place, nobody can infringe these patents, 09:02:17 …know existed before these patents that 09:13:06 16 aren't these patents, right? 09:13:07 17 | External link to document |
>Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |