Litigation Details for Huawei Technologies, Co, Ltd v. Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd. (N.D. Cal. 2016)

✉ Email this page to a colleague

Huawei Technologies, Co, Ltd v. Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd. (N.D. Cal. 2016)

Docket	⤷ Start Trial	Date Filed	2016-05-24
Court	District Court, N.D. California	Date Terminated	2019-03-25
Cause	35:271 Patent Infringement	Assigned To	William Horsley Orrick III
Jury Demand	Both	Referred To	Joseph Spero
Parties	HUAWEI DEVICE USA INC.
Patents	8,644,239
Attorneys	Theresa H Nguyen
Firms	Norton Rose Fulbright
Link to Docket	External link to docket

Small Molecule Drugs cited in Huawei Technologies, Co, Ltd v. Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd.

The small molecule drug covered by the patent cited in this case is ⤷ Start Trial .

Details for Huawei Technologies, Co, Ltd v. Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd. (N.D. Cal. 2016)

+ Get email alerts for changes to this table

Glossary

Subscribe to access the full database, or Start Trial
Date Filed	Document No.	Description	Snippet	Link To Document
2016-05-24				External link to document
2016-05-24	168	Order	’166 patent”); 8,812,848; 8,644,239 (“the ’239 patent”); 8,885,587; 8,885,583; 8,639,246…27 ’246 patent”); 8,412,197 (“the ’197 patent”); 8,996,003; and 8,724,613 (“the ’613 patent”). …26 Huawei has asserted U.S. Patent Nos. 8,369,278 (“the ’278 patent”); 8,416,892; 8,483,166 (“the …Samsung has asserted U.S. Patent Nos. 8,228,827, 8,315,195 (“the ’195 patent”), RE44,105, …8,457,588 (“the ’588 patent”), 8,509,350, 9,113,419, 8,619,726 (“the ’726 patent”), 8,761,130	External link to document
2016-05-24	191	Writ Issued	U.S. Patent Nos. 8,369,278; 8,416,892; 8,483,166; 8,812,848; 8,644,239; 8,885,587; 8,885,583; 8,639,246;…standard-essential patents (“SEPS”). In addition, Huawei alleged that Samsung infringes eleven of its patents: U.S.…alleged that Huawei infringes nine of its patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 8,228,827; 8,315,195; RE44,105; 8,…that they infringe the patents asserted against them and contend that the patents asserted against them…art exists that anticipates the patented claims or renders the patented claims obvious. Huawei has alleged	External link to document
>Date Filed	>Document No.	>Description	>Snippet	>Link To Document

Executive summary

Last updated: June 25, 2026

Case: Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 3:16-cv-02787 (E.D. Texas).
Core posture: Patent infringement dispute focused on wireless device communications and related technology.
Outcome: No complete litigation record details can be produced from the information provided in the prompt alone (no court documents, claims/patents-in-suit, asserted asserted counts, claim construction outcomes, jury verdict/dismissal status, or appellate history). Per operating constraints, a complete and accurate litigation summary and analysis cannot be delivered.

Litigation summary for Huawei v Samsung Electronics (3:16-cv-02787)

Answer (status and merits): Not provided in the prompt; cannot be summarized accurately without filings and dispositions (complaint, Dkt. events, Markman order, trial/jury verdict, post-trial motions, settlement or judgment, and any appeal).