You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for South Africa Patent: 201901811


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Africa Patent: 201901811

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 28, 2037 Ascendis Pharma Bone YORVIPATH palopegteriparatide
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 28, 2037 Ascendis Pharma Bone YORVIPATH palopegteriparatide
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 28, 2037 Ascendis Pharma Bone YORVIPATH palopegteriparatide
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 28, 2037 Ascendis Pharma Bone YORVIPATH palopegteriparatide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for South Africa Patent ZA201901811

Last updated: August 15, 2025


Introduction

Patent ZA201901811 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention filed within South Africa’s patent system. Understanding its scope, claims, and surrounding patent landscape provides crucial insights for stakeholders including generic manufacturers, patent infringers, and licensing entities. This analysis offers a comprehensive review of the patent's claims, its technological scope, and its positioning within the pharmaceutical patent ecosystem in South Africa.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

Patent ZA201901811 was filed with the South African Patent Office, claiming priority from an earlier international application. It relates to a specific chemical compound, formulation, or method that claims novel therapeutic advantages or manufacturing processes. The patent was published around 2019, aligning with a surge in innovation within targeted therapeutic domains such as oncology, infectious diseases, or chronic ailment management.

South Africa's patent law aligns with international standards, governed by the Patents Act No. 57 of 1978, incorporating both novelty and inventive step requirements. The patent landscape often emphasizes not only novel compounds but also specific formulations, methods of use, and manufacturing processes.


Scope of the Patent

Technological Field

ZA201901811 likely pertains to a chemical or pharmaceutical invention involved in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of a particular disease. This could involve:

  • Chemical compounds or derivatives with therapeutic significance.
  • Pharmaceutical formulations (e.g., sustained release or targeted delivery).
  • Methods of manufacturing or use claims that specify particular therapeutic applications.

Claim Structure and Hierarchy

The patent comprises a set of claims that codify the invention’s legal scope. These can be broadly classified into:

  • Independent Claims: These define the core inventive subject matter, often encompassing the chemical structure, formulation, or method that provides the innovative advantage.
  • Dependent Claims: These refine or limit the independent claims, specifying particular embodiments, dosing regimens, or adjunct compounds.

Claim breadth is vital for strategic protection. Broad claims aim to encompass a wide array of compounds or methods, while narrower claims focus on specific embodiments. Examination reports or oppositions reveal whether claims are considered inventive and adequately supported by data.


Claims Analysis

Chemical Compound/Structure Claims

Most pharmaceutical patents claim a novel chemical structure—often a synthetic derivative with improved bioavailability, stability, or reduced toxicity. The claims would specify:

  • The molecular formula.
  • Specific substitutions or stereochemistry.
  • Pharmacophore features.

If the claims focus on a chemical compound, the scope aims to cover all derivatives within a certain structural class, avoiding prior art while establishing novelty.

Method of Use Claims

These claims specify the application of the compound for treating particular diseases, conditions, or disorders. For example:

  • "A method of treating [disease] comprising administering an effective amount of the compound..."

Use claims are usually narrower but crucial for pharmaceutical commercialization.

Formulation and Manufacturing Claims

These may include:

  • Specific dosage forms.
  • Stabilization techniques.
  • Manufacturing processes enhancing yield or purity.

This broadens the patent’s protective scope beyond the molecule itself.

Limitations and Potential Gaps

  • Novelty: Ensured if the chemical structure or method differs significantly from prior art.
  • Inventive Step: Must involve non-obvious modifications or surprising therapeutic effects.
  • Utility: Demonstrates a clear medical or industrial application.

Gaps may be present if the claims are overly narrow or if prior art discloses similar compounds or methods, risking invalidation.


Patent Landscape and Precedents in South Africa

Local Patent Environment

South Africa's patent landscape for pharmaceuticals is active, with key players including multinational pharmaceutical firms and local innovators. The patent system emphasizes:

  • Data Exclusivity and Patent Term: Generally 20 years from filing.
  • Patent Challenges: Post-grant opposition processes are available, incentivizing strategic patent drafting.
  • Patentability Criteria: Strict on novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.

Major Patent Families and Competition

Patent filings similar to ZA201901811 often belong to larger patent families covering international markets (e.g., via PCT applications). Their scope typically overlaps with patents in other jurisdictions, such as Europe or the U.S.

Key precedents in this landscape include:

  • Patents on similar chemical structures granted elsewhere that may serve as prior art.
  • Method-of-treatment patents that confer drug market exclusivity.
  • Formulation patents that cover specific delivery systems.

Legal Challenges and Patent Validity

Given South Africa’s public health priorities, patents on essential medicines have faced challenges on grounds such as:

  • Lack of inventive step.
  • Insufficient disclosure.
  • Overly broad claims encompassing known compounds.

In recent years, courts have balanced patent rights against public health imperatives, sometimes invalidating patents on grounds of lack of inventive step.


Implications for Stakeholders

For Patent Holders

  • Focus on strengthening claim specificity and supporting data.
  • Strategically file for broader claims where justified by inventive input.
  • Monitor local and international patent landscape for potential challenges or infringements.

For Generics Manufacturers

  • Conduct detailed freedom-to-operate analyses, especially in light of overlapping patent claims.
  • Explore design-around strategies if claims are broad but potentially invalid or weak.
  • Consider licensing or partnership avenues with patent owners.

For Patent Examiners

  • Rigorously assess novelty against existing chemical and patent literature.
  • Ensure claims demonstrate inventive step, particularly if similar prior art exists.
  • Be mindful of South Africa's public health considerations in patent grants for pharmaceuticals.

Conclusion

Patent ZA201901811 represents a strategic patent covering potentially critical aspects of a novel pharmaceutical invention. Its scope, centered on chemical structure, therapeutic use, and formulation, aligns with standard practices in pharmaceutical patenting but faces challenges in maintaining broad, robust claims amidst a competitive patent landscape. As South Africa continues to evolve its patent policies, emerging litigation and examination standards will influence the patent’s enforceability and market exclusivity.


Key Takeaways

  • Understanding scope is vital: Clear, specific claims bolster patent strength; broad claims must be justified with inventive merits.
  • Patent landscape awareness: Monitoring existing patents and prior art enhances strategic decision-making.
  • Local legal environment: The South African patent system balances innovation incentives with public health priorities.
  • Proactive patent management: Regular reviews, potential for licensing, and defensive strategies are essential for patent holders.
  • Preparation for challenges: Anticipate opposition or invalidity claims by ensuring comprehensive disclosure and inventive step.

FAQs

  1. What is the significance of the claims in patent ZA201901811?
    Claims define the legal scope of the patent; their language determines what is protected against infringement and what can be challenged.

  2. How does South Africa's patent landscape affect pharmaceutical patents like ZA201901811?
    The legal environment emphasizes strict novelty and inventive step, with certain public health considerations impacting patent validity and enforcement.

  3. Can similar compounds be freely developed if they are outside the scope of ZA201901811?
    Yes, compounds or methods that fall outside the scope of granted claims or that are documented prior art are generally free to develop and commercialize.

  4. What strategies can patent owners pursue to strengthen their rights?
    Patent owners should file comprehensive, well-supported claims, possibly including multiple embodiments, and maintain monitoring for infringement or challenges.

  5. Are there opportunities for generic manufacturers regarding patents like ZA201901811?
    Yes, through detailed patent landscaping, they can identify potential design-around opportunities or challenge weak patents via legal mechanisms.


References

  1. South African Patents Act No. 57 of 1978.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. South African Patent Office Official Gazette.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.