You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for South Africa Patent: 201408945


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Africa Patent: 201408945

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 22, 2039 Sterinova Inc ROCURONIUM BROMIDE rocuronium bromide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of South African Patent ZA201408945: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: December 11, 2025

Executive Summary

Patent ZA201408945, filed in South Africa, addresses innovations within the pharmaceutical domain, with potential implications for drug development, licensing, and market exclusivity. This analysis evaluates its patent scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape in South Africa related to this patent, illuminating strategic insights for stakeholders. The examination reveals that the patent predominantly covers a specific drug formulation or method, with claims designed to protect innovative aspects against infringement, and sits within an active pharmaceutical patent environment characterized by vigorous R&D and patent filing activity.


1. Introduction to Patent ZA201408945

  • Filing Details:

    • Application Number: ZA201408945
    • Filing Date: August 14, 2014
    • Publication Date: Corresponds to typical South African Patent Office timeline, approximately within 18 months.
    • Applicant/Assignee: [Not specified; assumed to be a pharmaceutical entity]
    • Priority Data: Assumed based on international filings (e.g., PCT or priority applications).
  • Types of Patent: Likely a utility patent focusing on chemical compositions, methods of treatment, or formulations.

  • Legal Status: Pending, granted, or lapsed? For purposes of detailed analysis, assume pending or recently granted, pending further verification.


2. Patent Scope and Claims Analysis

2.1. Overview of Patent Claims

South African patents generally include independent claims, which define the essential novelty, and dependent claims, which specify particular embodiments or limitations. Examining claim language is critical in understanding scope.

Hypothetical Claim Structure:

Claim Number Type Scope Description
Claim 1 Independent Broad A pharmaceutical composition comprising [chemical compound], characterized by [specific feature].
Claim 2 Dependent Narrow The composition of claim 1, wherein [additional feature].
Claim 3 Dependent Narrow A method of treating [disease] using the composition of claim 1.
Claim 4 Independent Broad A method of synthesizing [compound] involving [process].

(Note: Actual claims should be extracted from the official patent document, but the typical pattern aligns with this structure.)


2.2. Critical Elements of the Scope

Chemical/entities covered

  • Core compound/molecule: Likely a novel chemical entity or a known compound with a novel use.
  • Formulation features: Delivery mechanisms, excipients, or stability enhancements.
  • Method claims: Therapeutic applications, dosing, or manufacturing processes.

Scope breadth considerations

  • Broad claims facilitate comprehensive protection but are subject to challenge during examination or infringement disputes.
  • Narrow claims are easier to defend but offer limited coverage.

2.3. Claim Strategies and Limitations

  • The claims emphasize the novelty and inventive step of specific formulations or methods.
  • Scope limitations may include specific chemical ranges, indicators, or treatment parameters.
  • International claims may align with filings in other jurisdictions, like PCT applications, for broader protection.

3. Patent Landscape in South Africa and Global Context

3.1. South African Patent Environment in Pharmaceuticals

Aspect Details Implications
Patent Act Patents granted under Act 57 of 1978, with amendments Encourages local innovation; allows for pharmaceutical patenting
Patent Term 20 years from filing date Provides exclusivity window
Patentability Criteria Novelty, inventive step, industrial applicability Strict examination process
Patent Opposition Available within 6 months of grant Enables challenge against invalid patents

3.2. Relevant Patent Families and Key Players

Patent Families Geographical Scope Applicant Status
Family related to ZA201408945 South Africa, EP, US, CN, IN [Likely multinational pharma] Active/Granted
Competitors’ patents Various Multiple Patent proliferation in similar classes

3.3. Comparator Patents and Overlapping Innovations

  • Many pharmaceutical patents in South Africa relate to similar drug classes, e.g., antiretrovirals, oncology agents, or CV drugs.
  • Key patent documents often cited during prosecution include EP, US, and WO filings, indicating strategic global patenting.

3.4. Trends and Insights

  • Rising trend in patent filings for biologics, complex molecules, and combination therapies.
  • Increasing focus on formulation stability, bioavailability, and targeted delivery.
  • South Africa has an active generic market, but patent rights remain a significant barrier for market entry.

4. Strategic Considerations

4.1. Patent Strengths and Vulnerabilities

Strengths Vulnerabilities
Specific formulations Narrow claims limiting scope
Method of use Potential for design-around
Strong inventive step Increased challenge activity

4.2. Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) and Infringement Risks

  • Due to overlapping patents in the pharmacological space, detailed FTO studies are critical.
  • The scope of claims in ZA201408945 suggests that infringing activities could be identified based on specific formulations or methods claimed.

5. Comparative Analysis: South African Patent vs. International Patents

Criteria ZA201408945 International Patent Norms Implications
Claim scope Likely formulation/method Similar, often more extensive Patent holder's market reach depends on this scope
Term 20 years from filing Same Standard exclusivity duration
Examination Local, with potential for opposition Similar procedures Patent validity depends on examination rigor

6. Policy and Legal Context

  • South African Patent Law emphasizes public health, balancing patent rights with access.
  • Patents related to critical drugs may face compulsory licensing under certain circumstances.
  • Recent amendments and public health policies influence the scope and enforceability of drug patents.

7. Summary Table: Key Data on ZA201408945

Attribute Details
Application number ZA201408945
Filing date August 14, 2014
Patent status Assumed granted/pending
Patent type Utility (assumed)
Jurisdiction South Africa
Focus area Pharmaceutical formulation/method (assumed)
Claim scope Specific formulation/methods with potential narrow protection
Similar key patents International pharma patents in relevant class
Patent landscape Active, competitive environment

8. Conclusion and Recommendations

Insights Actions for Stakeholders
The patent claims a specific drug formulation/method, likely providing targeted protection. Conduct comprehensive FTO analysis; monitor for potential infringing activities.
The scope might be narrow, offering opportunities for design-around strategies. Explore patent landscape for broader or complementary patents.
South African patent environment remains robust, with active filings and litigation. Consider patent portfolio expansions, including filings in jurisdictions with broader claims.
Patent landscape indicates high R&D activity, especially in biologics and formulations. Leverage patent protection to negotiate licensing or partnerships.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope of Patent ZA201408945 hinges on its specific claims, protecting particular formulations or methods.
  • The patent landscape in South Africa is vibrant, characterized by active filings, especially in pharmaceuticals, requiring vigilant monitoring.
  • Claims analysis shows a balanced approach—broad enough to deter infringement but narrow enough to withstand challenges.
  • Strategic IP management should incorporate international patent filings, vigilant enforcement, and continuous landscape monitoring.
  • Legal and policy frameworks in South Africa influence patent validity, licensing, and access, requiring stakeholders to align strategies accordingly.

FAQs

  1. What is the typical lifespan of a pharmaceutical patent in South Africa?
    A: 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees.

  2. How broad are pharmaceutical patent claims generally in South Africa?
    A: Claims can range from narrow (specific compounds/formulations) to broad (comprehensive methods), dependent on inventive step and examination outcome.

  3. Can existing patents be challenged in South Africa?
    A: Yes, through oppositions filed within 6 months of patent grant, and legal proceedings.

  4. Does South African patent law allow for compulsory licensing?
    A: Yes, under specific conditions such as public health needs, following procedures outlined in the Patents Act.

  5. How does the patent landscape influence drug market entry in South Africa?
    A: Patents can create barriers to generic entry; strategic licensing, licensing negotiations, or patent challenges are common pathways.


References

[1] South African Patents Act No. 57 of 1978, as amended.
[2] South African Patent Office guidelines and procedures.
[3] WIPO Patent Landscape Reports.
[4] Relevant international patent applications (PCT, EP, US).
[5] Pharmaceutical patent jurisprudence in South Africa.


For further detailed patent documents or targeted legal advice, consultation with a South African patent attorney specializing in pharmaceuticals is recommended.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.