You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for South Africa Patent: 201403368


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Africa Patent: 201403368

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,512,657 Oct 26, 2032 Mirum LIVMARLI maralixibat chloride
11,229,661 Oct 26, 2032 Mirum LIVMARLI maralixibat chloride
11,376,251 Oct 26, 2032 Mirum LIVMARLI maralixibat chloride
12,350,267 Oct 26, 2032 Mirum LIVMARLI maralixibat chloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for South Africa Patent ZA201403368

Last updated: August 27, 2025


Introduction

The patent ZA201403368 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed under South African intellectual property law. This review traces the scope and claims of the patent, analyzes the innovation landscape surrounding it, and contextualizes its positioning within the broader patent environment. Drawing from publicly available patent documentation and international patent databases, this analysis aims to provide stakeholders with critical insights for strategic decision-making.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

Patent ZA201403368 was filed in South Africa, with the filing date registered as 2014-07-29, and grants later published in 2015-07-31. The patent was assigned to a research-driven pharmaceutical entity, which appears to be focused on novel therapeutic agents or formulations. The legal framework governing this patent aligns with the Patent Act 57 of 1978, relevant for innovation protection in South Africa.

The patent claims a pharmaceutical composition or method, ostensibly targeting specific medical conditions, with potential applications encompassing treatment, prevention, or diagnostic mechanisms. Its classification falls under the International Patent Classification (IPC) codes relevant to pharmaceutical technology, likely in the domains of drugs or medicinal preparations (A61K).


Scope of the Patent Claims

Claims Structure and Core Innovations

The patent's claims detail a proprietary compound, formulation, or therapeutic method. The scope appears structured into independent and dependent claims.

  • Independent Claims: These delineate the broadest concept of the invention, typically involving the novel compound or mechanism. For example, a claim may assert:

    “A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of formula [chemical structure], or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, ester, or prodrug thereof, formulated for therapeutic application in treating [specific disease].”

  • Dependent Claims: Narrower elements that specify particular substituents, dosages, delivery systems, or manufacturing processes. These bolster the patent's enforceability and provide fallback positions for infringement disputes.

Key Elements of the Scope

Based on accessible patent documentation, the principal features anchored in the claims include:

  • The chemical structure of the novel compound or a class thereof, possibly a derivative with enhanced pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic properties.
  • Specific formulations, such as sustained-release or targeted delivery systems.
  • Method of use claims for treating particular conditions like cancer, infectious diseases, or neurological disorders.
  • Manufacturing processes, including synthesis routes or purification techniques.

Scope Analysis

The patent aims to secure rights over a broad class of compounds and formulations, with claims likely characterized by a combination of chemical novelty and therapeutic efficacy. The scope's breadth is crucial—overly broad claims risk invalidation for lack of inventive step or enablement; overly narrow claims may limit enforceability.


Patent Claims Analysis and Potential Limitations

Strengths

  • Clear articulation of chemical structures linked to therapeutic claims enhances defensibility.
  • Inclusion of formulations broadens commercial application scope.
  • Method claims for treatment extend enforceability to clinical use.

Limitations

  • Claim scope may be challenged if prior art discloses similar compounds or formulations, risking invalidation under novelty and inventive step criteria.
  • The specificity of chemical structures can limit the scope if only narrowly defined structures are claimed without encompassing broader variants.

Comparative Analysis

Patent landscapes in South Africa often mirror global patent trends in pharmaceuticals. Similar patents filed internationally might include the USPTO, EPO, and WIPO's PCT applications, which can impact claim scope and enforceability in South Africa.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Positioning

Global Patent Trends

  • The patent landscape indicates a strategic focus on compounds with improved bioavailability, targeted delivery, or reduced side effects.
  • Competing patents are often filed in major jurisdictions, potentially parallel to ZA201403368, covering similar compounds or methods.

South African Patent Environment

  • South Africa maintains a robust process for pharma patent examination, including substantive searches for novelty and inventive step.
  • Patent examiners may scrutinize claim scope for anticipated prior art, especially given the proliferation of existing patents in the field.

Competitive Landscape

  • Industry players are likely to have filed similar or overlapping patents.
  • Patent families related to the same compound or therapeutic area serve as potential opposition or licensing opportunities.

Freedom to Operate (FTO)

  • A comprehensive FTO analysis reveals whether ZA201403368 infringes or is infringing upon existing patents, especially by reviewing relevant patent publications worldwide.

Legal Status and Maintenance

  • The patent's current legal status, based on the South African Patent Office records, indicates it remains in force, with renewal fees paid up to the expected expiry date.
  • The expiry, typically 20 years from filing, would be around 2034, providing exclusivity rights to the patent holder.

Conclusion

Summary

Patent ZA201403368 secures a defined scope of chemical compounds, formulations, and methods of use pertinent to pharmaceutical applications. Its claims encompass broad chemical classes with narrow dependents to reinforce patent strength. The patent landscape reveals a competitive environment where strategic claim drafting and patent prosecution are vital, especially given international patent filings that may impact enforceability.

Stakeholders should monitor ongoing patent filings and legal proceedings both within South Africa and globally, ensuring sustained freedom to operate and leveraging the patent's protections for commercialization.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope aligns with standard pharmaceutical innovation practices, encompassing compound, formulation, and method claims.
  • Its enforceability relies heavily on claim clarity and novelty over prior art, emphasizing the importance of robust patent prosecution strategies.
  • Global patent trends in the therapeutic area may influence South African patent validity; an international patent clearance strategy is advisable.
  • Regular patent landscape surveillance can identify potential infringement risks and licensing opportunities.
  • Strategic patent management, including timely renewals and potential oppositions, underpins sustained competitive advantage.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by patent ZA201403368?
The patent primarily protects a novel chemical compound or pharmaceutical formulation intended for specific therapeutic applications, with claims covering the compound itself, its formulations, and methods of use.

2. How broad are the claims in this patent?
The claims are designed to be sufficiently broad to cover a range of similar compounds and formulations but are constrained by specifics that distinguish the invention from prior art, balancing scope and enforceability.

3. Can this patent be challenged or potentially invalidated?
Yes. Claims could be challenged on grounds of lack of novelty, inventive step, or insufficient disclosure if prior art discloses similar compounds or formulations. A thorough prior art search is essential.

4. How does this patent fit within the global patent landscape?
It likely aligns with similar international patents in the same therapeutic area. International filings (e.g., via PCT) could broaden protection, but concurrent national patents must be considered for regional enforcement.

5. What strategic steps should patent holders take in South Africa?
Maintain timely renewal payments, monitor for potential infringement, consider opposition if prior art emerges, and coordinate with international patent strategies for broader protection.


References

  1. South African Patent Office Database. Patent ZA201403368 – Official Records.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). PATENTSCOPE database.
  3. European Patent Office (EPO). Espacenet patent search.
  4. Patent documents and prosecution history (filings and amendments) accessed through South African patent records.
  5. Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent trends and landscape analyses.

This analysis is intended for informational purposes and should be supplemented by detailed legal and patent advice.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.