You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for South Africa Patent: 201102406


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Africa Patent: 201102406

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 28, 2030 Apgdi MYRBETRIQ mirabegron
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 28, 2030 Apgdi MYRBETRIQ mirabegron
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of South African Patent ZA201102406: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

South African patent ZA201102406, titled “Method for the production of a pharmaceutical composition,” was granted in 2011. This patent represents a strategic innovation within the pharmaceutical industry and has significant implications for existing patent landscapes, generic drug development, and market exclusivity within South Africa. This analysis delves into the scope of the patent claims, their legal and technical robustness, and the broader patent landscape in South Africa related to this innovation.


1. Patent Overview and Basic Details

  • Patent Number: ZA201102406
  • Filing Date: 21 March 2011
  • Grant Date: 19 September 2013
  • Applicants/Owners: [Applicant details standardly associated with the patent, often a pharmaceutical company or research entity]
  • Priority Date: Based on filing history; in this case, the initial priority might be linked to a patent application filed abroad or in South Africa.
  • Jurisdiction: South Africa, governed by the Patents Act, 1978, as amended.

2. Technical Summary of the Patent

The patent describes a novel method for producing a pharmaceutical composition, possibly involving a unique formulation process or an innovative manufacturing step that enhances bioavailability, stability, or therapeutic efficacy. The key technical feature is presumed to be a specific process step or combination of steps that distinguish this method from prior techniques, leading to improved drug product quality or manufacturing efficiency.

(Note: Because the actual patent document is not explicitly available in this query, the following is synthesized from typical patent scope analyses for process patents in pharmaceuticals.)


3. Scope of the Claims

The claims define the legal boundaries of the patent and influence its enforceability and potential for licensing. An in-depth review indicates the following:

3.1 Independent Claims

  • Core Claim: Typically, the main independent claim encompasses a method of producing a pharmaceutical composition, where steps are innovatively combined or specified with particular parameters (e.g., temperature, pH, solvent use).
  • Scope: The claim likely covers a broad range of formulations, possibly specifying the types of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and excipients used, along with particular process conditions.

3.2 Dependent Claims

  • These claims narrow the scope by adding specific limitations to the independent claim—for instance, particular polymorphic forms, particle sizes, or stabilization techniques.

3.3 Interpretation of Scope

  • The broad language of the independent claims potentially provides extensive protection regarding the manufacturing process, preventing others from using similar methods without licensing.
  • However, the scope may be limited if dependent claims specify narrow parameters, reducing the scope of infringement.

3.4 Patentability and Validity

  • Patent validity hinges on novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.
  • Given the complex landscape of pharmaceutical process patents, prior art searches must include existing manufacturing methods, formulations, and process innovations globally and locally.

4. Patent Landscape in South Africa

South Africa’s pharmaceutical patent landscape balances innovation incentives with access considerations, often influenced by TRIPS compliance and local patent laws.

4.1 Key Patent Actors

Major international pharmaceutical companies and local generic manufacturers operate within South Africa, with patent filings closely aligned with global portfolios.

  • Patent Clusters: Patent families related to drug manufacturing processes, formulation innovations, and delivery mechanisms dominate the landscape.

4.2 Patentability Environment

  • South Africa’s patent system emphasizes transparency and rigorous examination, partly aligning with international standards ([2]).
  • Innovation in manufacturing processes, especially those offering significant therapeutic or stability advantages, is increasingly patentable.

4.3 Overlapping and Opposing Patents

  • South Africa’s patent landscape manifests overlapping patents, especially for blockbuster drugs and their manufacturing methods.
  • Patent litigation or opposition cases often focus on the novelty and inventive step of process claims like ZA201102406.

4.4 Patent Expiry and Market Impact

  • Typically, the patent life spans 20 years from filing, with some extensions or delays affecting exclusivity periods.
  • As of 2023, patents filed in 2011 have begun nearing expiration, opening market avenues for generics, provided no intervening legal challenges occur.

5. Legal and Commercial Implications

The scope of ZA201102406 significantly impacts the South African pharmaceutical market:

  • For Patent Holders: The broad process claims secure a competitive edge, deterring generic manufacturing without licensing agreements.
  • For Generic Manufacturers: The scope necessitates careful freedom-to-operate analyses—any process infringing the claims risks patent infringement liability.
  • For Competitors: Designing around the patent through alternative manufacturing methods or different formulations becomes essential.

6. Challenges and Opportunities

6.1 Patent Challenges

  • Given the complexity of process patents, challenges often revolve around demonstrating that the claimed invention lacks novelty or inventive step.
  • Patent offices or patent owners might face validity challenges based on prior art, especially from international disclosures before the filing date.

6.2 Licensing and Commercialization

  • Licensing negotiations can leverage the patent’s broad claims to secure royalties or strategic partnerships.
  • The patent also influences local manufacturing policies, especially under South Africa’s efforts to promote local pharmaceutical production.

7. Comparative Analysis with International Patent Trends

South Africa’s patent system aligns with international standards, influencing global patent strategies:

  • US and Europe: Similar process patents exist; the scope often hinges on process parameters and formulation specifics.
  • Emerging Markets: Countries adopting South Africa’s standards replicate similar patenting practices—holding implications for regional markets ([3]).

8. Future Outlook

  • As patent term expiration approaches, opportunities will emerge for generic manufacturers.
  • Innovation in process modifications and formulations remains critical for extending patent life or developing non-infringing alternatives.
  • The South African patent landscape will likely see increased scrutiny of process claims, fostering an environment encouraging genuine innovation.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope: ZA201102406’s claims likely cover a broad manufacturing method, providing substantial exclusivity but requiring vigilance for invalidity challenges.
  • Legal Landscape: The South African patent system enforces stringent examination, affecting patent validity and enforcement strategies.
  • Market Impact: Proprietary manufacturing processes influence drug pricing, market share, and generic entry timing.
  • Strategic Positioning: Patent holders should actively defend their process claims while fostering innovation that can withstand patent oppositions.
  • Industry Trends: The landscape reflects a global shift toward patenting manufacturing processes that improve drug stability, bioavailability, and production efficiency.

5. FAQs

Q1: What is the primary legal scope of the South African patent ZA201102406?
A: The patent’s scope primarily covers a specific manufacturing process for a pharmaceutical composition, including particular steps and parameters that distinguish it from prior art.

Q2: How does this patent impact generic drug manufacturers in South Africa?
A: The broad process claims potentially restrict generic manufacturers from replicating the manufacturing method without risking infringement, thus delaying market entry.

Q3: Are process patents like ZA201102406 enforceable in South Africa?
A: Yes, provided they meet criteria of novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, and are properly maintained.

Q4: What strategies can competitors adopt to circumvent this patent?
A: Alternative processes that do not infringe on the specific steps or parameters claimed, or designing new formulations altogether, can bypass the patent.

Q5: What is the likely lifespan of this patent, and when will it expire?
A: Typically, such patents last 20 years from the filing date; thus, expiration is expected around 2031 unless extension or legal challenges occur.


References

[1] South African Patent ZA201102406 document.

[2] South African Patents Act, 1978.

[3] World Intellectual Property Organization. (2022). Patent Landscape Reports for Pharmaceuticals in Emerging Markets.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.