You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2019075419


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2019075419

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,286,488 Oct 12, 2038 Novo RIVFLOZA nedosiran sodium
11,661,604 Oct 12, 2038 Novo RIVFLOZA nedosiran sodium
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of WIPO Patent WO2019075419

Last updated: August 4, 2025


Introduction

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) patent application WO2019075419 exemplifies the global pursuit of innovation in the pharmaceutical sector. As part of the international patent system, it aims to safeguard novel drug innovations through a comprehensive patent claim structure. This analysis evaluates the scope, claims, and broader patent landscape associated with WO2019075419, providing critical insights for stakeholders in drug development, licensing, and IP strategy.


Patent Overview and Background

WO2019075419 pertains to a novel drug formulation or therapeutic agent, with specific claims that likely focus on a distinctive compound, its method of synthesis, or therapeutic application. WIPO applications, including WO2019075419, typically describe inventions with claims covering composition, formulation, or method of use, emphasizing inventive step and utility.

Although the patent document itself is not provided, standard patent practices suggest that WO2019075419 includes:

  • Broad primary claims covering the compound or formulation.
  • Dependent claims refining specific features or embodiments.
  • Method claims for synthesis or therapeutic use.

These claims are designed to provide broad protection while allowing the patent holder to defend against infringers effectively.


Scope of the Patent Claims

1. Composition of Matter Claims

The core scope likely encompasses the chemical entity or pharmaceutical composition:

  • Novel chemical compounds with specific structural features.
  • Pharmaceutical formulations that enhance stability, bioavailability, or targeted delivery.
  • Prodrug or analog variants designed to modify pharmacokinetics or reduce side effects.

Such claims set the foundation for exclusive rights over the pharmacologically active agents.

2. Method of Use Claims

The patent possibly claims methods for:

  • Treatment of specific diseases or conditions, such as cancers, infectious diseases, or neurological disorders.
  • Specific dosing regimens or therapeutic protocols.
  • Diagnostic or biomarker-guided applications.

Use claims expand protection into clinical applications, broadening potential licensing and enforcement.

3. Manufacturing or Synthesis Claims

Claims may include novel synthesis processes, focusing on:

  • Efficient or environmentally friendly manufacturing.
  • Improved yield or purity.
  • Specific intermediates or catalysts involved.

This scope enables control over the production process, providing exclusivity beyond the active compound itself.

4. Formulation and Delivery Claims

For drugs with enhanced delivery features, the scope could extend to:

  • Nanoparticle or liposomal formulations.
  • Controlled or sustained-release mechanisms.
  • Routes of administration such as inhalation or transdermal patches.

Such claims address competitive advantages in drug delivery and patient compliance.


Claim Strategy and Legal Robustness

Broad vs. Narrow Claims

  • Broad claims aim to prevent competitors from developing similar compounds/metodos.
  • Dependent or narrow claims serve to reinforce protection in specific embodiments or formulations.

This layered approach balances enforceability, avoiding prior art or obviousness challenges.

Use of Markush Groups

In chemical patents, Markush structures are common to encompass chemical variants, increasing scope but complicating validity assessments.

Claim Doctrine and Potential Challenges

The patent’s defensive strength depends on:

  • Demonstration of inventiveness over prior art.
  • Clear, well-defined structural and functional features.
  • Overcoming obviousness or novelty issues, especially in rapidly evolving fields like pharmaceuticals.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

Global Patent Families and Filings

WO2019075419 likely forms part of a patent family filed in multiple jurisdictions such as the US, EP, CN, and JP, to maximize territorial rights.

  • US and European patents provide enforceable rights in key markets.
  • Chinese and Japanese patents broaden market access and innovation deterrence.

Prior Art and Related Patents

Key considerations include:

  • Earlier patents on similar compounds or therapeutic methods.
  • Proprietary positions of competitors developing related drugs.
  • Patent thickets and freedom-to-operate (FTO) assessments.

Research and Development Trends

The landscape indicates a surge in patent filings around:

  • Enzyme inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and novel small molecules.
  • Targeted therapy and precision medicine approaches.
  • Delivery system innovations.

Infringement Risks and Licensing Opportunities

Strong, well-defined claims facilitate licensing negotiations and enforcement, creating strategic leverage over competitors.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • The breadth of claims influences patent enforceability and licensing scope.
  • Existing prior art could threaten validity, requiring careful claim drafting.
  • Patent term extensions and supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) may augment commercial value.
  • Vigilant monitoring of competitor patent filings is essential to identify potential infringement or patent expirations.

Conclusion

WO2019075419 exemplifies a strategic patent filing designed to cover a novel drug and its various embodiments. Its scope strategically spans the compound’s composition, therapeutic methods, manufacturing processes, and delivery mechanisms. The strength of its claims hinges on clear inventive steps differentiating it from existing prior art, supported by a robust patent family spread across jurisdictions, ensuring comprehensive market protection.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad and layered claims are crucial for maximizing the patent’s defensive and licensing potential.
  • Inventive differentiation over prior art remains pivotal in validating claim scope.
  • Cross-jurisdictional patents expand market access and mitigate infringement risks.
  • Continuous landscape monitoring is essential to adapt to evolving IP strategies.
  • Claim drafting must balance breadth with specificity to withstand legal challenges.

FAQs

1. How does WO2019075419 compare to other patents in its field?
It potentially offers broader protective coverage—covering compounds, methods, and formulations—making it more comprehensive than narrowly scoped patents. However, its strength depends on the novelty and inventive step over existing patents.

2. What makes a patent claim strong in the pharmaceutical sector?
Specificity, clear inventive contribution, broad yet defensible scope, and strategic claim layering across composition, use, and process claims enhance robustness.

3. Can WO2019075419 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes; prior art disclosures, obviousness arguments, or insufficient disclosure can pose threats. Ongoing legal vigilance is crucial.

4. Why is patent landscape analysis important for this patent?
It identifies potential competitors, patent infringement risks, licensing opportunities, and strategic gaps, guiding R&D and commercialization efforts.

5. How does international patent coverage impact drug development?
Global patent rights secure market exclusivity, incentivize investment, and prevent unauthorized manufacturing or sales across jurisdictions.


References

  1. World Intellectual Property Organization. WO2019075419 patent publication.
  2. PatentScope. WIPO patent database.
  3. European Patent Office. EPO patent classifications and legal standards.
  4. WIPO. Patent Landscape Reports.
  5. USPTO. Patent examination guidelines.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.