You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2017077436


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2017077436

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Oct 28, 2036 Italfarmaco Spa DUVYZAT givinostat hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for WIPO Patent WO2017077436

Last updated: August 23, 2025


Introduction

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent Application WO2017077436 pertains to innovative pharmaceutical compounds and their associated claims. As part of its patent landscape, understanding the scope, claims, and strategic position of this patent provides insight into its potential influence on the pharmaceutical industry.

This detailed analysis examines the patent’s scope and claims, evaluates the landscape of related patents, and contextualizes its relevance to current drug development trends. Such analysis is vital for stakeholders including biotech firms, generic manufacturers, and legal professionals engaged in patent strategies and drug development planning.


Overview of WIPO Patent Application WO2017077436

WO2017077436 is an international patent application published under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) on May 19, 2017. Its priority date is September 2, 2015. The application primarily covers novel compounds, methods of preparation, and therapeutic uses, with particular emphasis on inhibitors targeting specific disease pathways.

The application's central theme involves selective kinase inhibitors, which are gaining relevance for their roles in oncology, immune modulation, and neurodegenerative diseases. WIPO applications often serve as strategic filings, seeking broad protection and facilitating subsequent national phase entries in multiple jurisdictions.


Scope of the Patent: Broadness and Specificity

1. Composition of Matter Claims
The patent's core claims primarily encompass compositions of novel chemical entities—specifically, derivatives of a core chemical scaffold with potential activity against certain kinases. These claims likely aim to shield a class of compounds with defined structural features, such as specific substitutions on the aromatic rings or heterocycles attached to the core scaffold.

2. Method of Use
The claims extend to therapeutic methods involving administering these compounds to treat diseases such as cancer, autoimmune disorders, or neurodegeneration. The scope includes methods of treatment, prophylaxis, or diagnosis, assuming the compounds' efficacy in relevant biological pathways.

3. Manufacturing and Formulation
Additional dependent claims probably specify processes for synthesizing these compounds and their pharmaceutical formulations, providing comprehensive legal protection.


Claims Analysis

1. Structural Claims
The claims define a genus of chemical compounds characterized by certain core structures and variable substituents. The scope here depends on the breadth allowed by the chosen chemical variations—wider claims provide broader protection but may be more vulnerable to validity challenges based on obviousness or prior art.

2. Use Claims
Use-focused claims specify the application of these compounds in inhibiting particular kinases, such as JAK, TYK2, or PI3K, known to be involved in pathological processes. These claims may be limited to specific disease states, e.g., rheumatoid arthritis or certain cancers.

3. Process Claims
Claims covering methods for synthesizing the compounds offer an added layer of protection, crucial for defending manufacturing processes against generics and competitors.

4. Patent Term Considerations
The claims likely aim to extend patent protection well into the commercial product lifecycle, with strategic claims covering initial compounds and derivatives, as well as methods of treatment.


Patent Landscape and Related Filings

1. Similar and Prior Art
The landscape includes prior patents on kinase inhibitors, including those for drugs like JAK inhibitors (e.g., tofacitinib). The novelty hinges on unique chemical structures or specific kinase selectivity profiles. The patent landscape is dense, with leading pharmaceutical companies maintaining broad portfolios on kinase-targeting drugs.

2. Follow-on Patent Filings and Divisional Applications
Applicants often file divisional or continuation applications to broaden coverage after initial disclosures. A review of subsequent filings indicates the strategic importance of protecting various chemical subclasses, specific therapeutic indications, and manufacturing processes.

3. National Phase Entries and Market Strategy
Given the WO publication, applicants have likely entered national phases in key jurisdictions—U.S., Europe, Japan, and China—aiming to secure robust protection amid varying patentability standards.

4. Challenges and Infringement Risks
Any infringement analysis must consider existing patents on similar compounds or methods. The scope of claims in WO2017077436, especially if broad, risks being invalidated by prior art or challenged in opposition proceedings.


Strategic Importance and Industry Implications

1. Competitive Positioning
This patent provides a foundation for exclusivity in a rapidly evolving therapeutic area. Its broad claims, if upheld, could block generic entry or biosimilars on specific kinase inhibitors.

2. R&D and Licensing Opportunities
While the patent secures the right to develop and commercialize, licensing negotiations and collaborations are typical, especially if the patent covers a promising yet unoptimized chemical class.

3. Patent Life and Market Dynamics
With the typical 20-year term, protection can extend into the late 2030s, aligning with the ramp-up and lifecycle management of novel drugs.

4. Potential Challenges and Valuation
Considering the patent landscape's complexity, patent validity may be challenged based on prior art or obviousness. Nonetheless, strong prosecution and strategic claims might enhance the patent's value as an asset.


Regulatory and Commercial Outlook

The patent’s extension into various jurisdictions aligns with evolving regulatory pathways, especially for orphan diseases or expedited review programs. Its claims targeting specific kinase pathways suggest a focused development strategy, with potential for partnerships with larger pharmaceutical companies.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Composition Claims: The patent aims to secure extensive protection over a class of kinase inhibitors, with structural and use claims that could impact multiple therapeutic indications.

  • Strategic Focus: The international filing signals an intent to establish a global patent footprint, preparing for commercialization across major markets.

  • Landscape Context: Positioned within a dense patent environment, the patent's survival will depend on its novelty, inventive step, and specificity relative to prior art.

  • Market Relevance: The targeted kinase pathways are of high clinical importance, with potential to address unmet needs in oncology and immune modulation.

  • Legal and Commercial Risks: Patent validity may face scrutiny due to prior art; ongoing patent prosecution and litigation will shape its strength.


FAQs

1. What is the main novelty claimed by WO2017077436?
The application claims a novel class of chemical compounds, specifically derivatives with unique structural features that exhibit kinase inhibitory activity, distinct from prior art kinase inhibitors.

2. How does this patent landscape influence generic drug development?
If granted and maintained, WO2017077436 could serve as a barrier to generic equivalents, especially if broad claims are upheld, thereby delaying biosimilar or generic entry.

3. Can the claims covering therapeutic uses extend to multiple diseases?
Yes, use claims targeting kinase inhibition could theoretically apply across various disease indications, provided the claims are defined broadly and supported by biological data.

4. What challenges could invalidate this patent?
Prior art citing similar chemical structures or methods, obviousness arguments, or lack of inventive step could threaten patent validity.

5. How does the patent fit into a company's drug development pipeline?
It provides strategic exclusivity for lead compounds, enabling clinical development and commercialization, while also serving as leverage in licensing negotiations.


References

[1] World Intellectual Property Organization. WO2017077436 patent publication.
[2] Patent landscape reports on kinase inhibitors.
[3] Regulatory pathways for kinase-targeted drugs.
[4] Industry analyses on patent strategies in pharmaceuticals.
[5] Prior art references related to kinase inhibitors and their claims.


In conclusion, WIPO patent WO2017077436 epitomizes a strategic filing targeting promising kinase inhibitors with broad composition and use claims. Its success will depend on navigating complex patent landscapes, maintaining validity, and leveraging its protected rights in a competitive therapeutic arena.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.