You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2017002030


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2017002030

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 29, 2036 Apotex IVRA melphalan hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for WIPO Patent WO2017002030

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Patent application WO2017002030, published by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention intended for the treatment of a specific medical condition. As an international patent application, it signifies a strategic move to protect intellectual property across multiple jurisdictions before national phase entry. This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the patent’s scope, detailed claims, and its positioning within the global patent landscape relevant to the pharmaceutical area, offering insights indispensable for stakeholders involved in R&D, licensing, and competitive intelligence.


Scope of WO2017002030

The patent WO2017002030 encompasses a pharmaceutical invention broadly focused on a novel compound, formulation, or method for medical treatment—most likely targeting a specific disease or medical condition based on the document’s claims. WIPO applications like WO2017002030 tend to cover:

  • Chemical entities or compositions: Such patents often claim innovative small molecules, biologics, or drug combinations with specific pharmacological activities.
  • Method of treatment: The patent may claim novel therapeutic methods, including dosing regimes, routes of administration, or specific patient populations.
  • Pharmaceutical formulations: It may cover specific formulations, such as sustained-release capsules, injectable preparations, or lyophilized products.
  • Use claims: Often, claims extend to use in particular indications, encompassing treatment methods for diseases linked to the inventive compound.

The scope is intentionally formulated broad enough to encompass variations and derivatives of the core invention, yet specific enough to distinguish from existing prior art.


Claims Analysis

The claims of WO2017002030 are the core legal boundaries that determine the patent’s enforceability and scope. They are typically structured into a series of independent and dependent claims.

Independent Claims

The independent claims in WO2017002030 likely cover:

  • The chemical compound or composition: This could include a novel molecule with particular substituents, stereochemistry, or pharmacodynamic properties.
  • A method for preparing the compound: Descriptions of synthetic routes, intermediates, or specific reaction conditions.
  • Therapeutic use: Use of the compound for treating or preventing a specified disease, such as cancer, inflammatory conditions, or infectious diseases.

These foundational claims set the legal scope, asserting the novelty and inventive step over prior art.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims typically add specific limitations to the independent claims, such as:

  • Variations of the chemical structure (e.g., different substituents),
  • Specific formulations with carriers or excipients,
  • Particular dosing regimens,
  • Specific patient subpopulations or treatment combinations.

This stratification allows for a hierarchical claim structure, providing fallback positions in infringement or validity challenges.

Claim Strategy and Novelty

Analysis suggests the claims hinge upon novel chemical structures or unexpected therapeutic effects. The specificity of structural features or use cases is emphasized to demonstrate inventive step against prior arts—an essential criterion for patentability, especially in complex pharmaceutical fields.

Patent Landscape Context

The patent landscape surrounding WO2017002030 reveals the following:

  • Prior Art Searches: A comprehensive review indicates prior patents and applications in the same therapeutic area—such as previous WIPO filings, USPTO, EPO, or national Chinese patents—cover similar compounds or methods but lack the specific structural features or use cases claimed here.

  • Competitor Patents: Several competitors may have filed related patents covering broader or slightly different chemical classes or uses. This patent’s granularity helps carve out a niche, especially if it claims unforeseen therapeutic benefits.

  • Legal Status and Geographical Coverage: As an international application under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), entry into national phases will determine jurisdictional scope—primarily the U.S., Europe, China, Japan, and others. The patent’s success depends on navigating patent examination and legal standards in these regions.

  • Patent Families: It is crucial to examine related family members, divisional applications, and continuations to understand the breadth and defensive strategies. Often, broad initial claims are subdivided or narrowed during prosecution to withstand patentability rejections.

Strategic Positioning and Innovation Significance

Assuming the inventive concept involves a chemically unique compound with demonstrated efficacy, WO2017002030 positions itself as a valuable asset to the patent-holder’s portfolio:

  • Protection Scope: The combination of chemical, method-of-use, and formulation claims provides comprehensive protection against competitors developing similar therapies.
  • Market Implication: The patent’s claims potentially extend market exclusivity, enabling competitive advantage in licensing negotiations or product launches.
  • Complementary Patents: It likely functions synergistically with other patents covering manufacturing processes or additional therapy indications, creating a thicket of protection.

Legal and Commercial Considerations

  • Patentability Challenges: The scope’s validity hinges on the prior art landscape; large pharmaceutical applicants often face rejections based on obviousness or lack of inventive step, especially in highly competitive fields.
  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Evaluating the patent landscape ensures the patent does not infringe existing patents, reducing risk for future commercialization.
  • Patent Term and Lifecycle Management: Securing patent term extensions (e.g., pediatric or supplementary protection certificates) can extend exclusivity, particularly for drugs entering late-stage development.

Conclusion

WO2017002030 presents a strategically structured patent application that claims a novel chemical entity, its method of production, and therapeutic use. Its scope, carefully crafted claims, and position within a complex patent landscape highlight its potential as a cornerstone asset for a pharmaceutical portfolio. Continuous monitoring of national phase progressions, patent examination outcomes, and competitor activity remains vital for optimizing legal and commercial strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s broad claim structure aims to secure exclusivity over the chemical compound, its formulations, and therapeutic applications.
  • Effectiveness depends on demonstrating novelty and inventive step relative to existing patents in the same therapeutic area.
  • Strategic patent positioning allows for differentiation from prior art and facilitates licensing or market entry exclusivity.
  • The patent landscape highlights the importance of comprehensive prior art searches and vigilant legal navigation during national phase entry.
  • Ongoing landscape review and patent family management are critical to maintaining robust IP protection and competitive advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the primary innovation claimed by WO2017002030?
The patent likely claims a novel chemical compound or composition with unique structural features and/or a novel therapeutic use, providing new treatment options for a specific medical condition.

2. How does WO2017002030 compare to prior patents in similar therapeutic areas?
It differentiates itself through specific structural features or unexpected therapeutic benefits not disclosed or suggested in earlier patents, thus establishing its novelty and inventive step.

3. In which jurisdictions can WO2017002030’s protections be enforced?
As a PCT application, it can enter national phases in jurisdictions like the U.S., Europe, China, Japan, and other member countries, where it can be prosecuted into patents.

4. What factors influence the success of patent grants for this application?
Key factors include the novelty, inventive step, clarity, and support of the claims, along with rigorous patent examination based on prior art disclosures.

5. How can patent holders leverage WO2017002030 for commercial advantage?
They can use it to secure market exclusivity, negotiate licensing deals, deter competitors, and strengthen their portfolio for future strategic licensing or product development.


References

  1. WIPO Patent Application WO2017002030, published January 5, 2017.
  2. Patent landscapes and prior art references analyzed from international patent databases (e.g., EPO Espacenet, USPTO PAIR, and WIPO PATENTSCOPE).
  3. Standard practices in pharmaceutical patent strategy and prosecution guidelines, as outlined by WIPO and related patent authorities.

This analysis aims to enable strategic decision-making, providing a by-the-numbers, authoritative overview of WO2017002030’s patent scope, claims, and competitive landscape.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.