You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2011089604


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2011089604

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 20, 2031 Urogen Pharma ZUSDURI mitomycin
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 20, 2031 Urogen Pharma JELMYTO mitomycin
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 20, 2031 Urogen Pharma ZUSDURI mitomycin
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 20, 2031 Urogen Pharma ZUSDURI mitomycin
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 20, 2031 Urogen Pharma JELMYTO mitomycin
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 20, 2031 Urogen Pharma ZUSDURI mitomycin
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 20, 2031 Urogen Pharma JELMYTO mitomycin
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for WIPO Patent Application WO2011089604

Last updated: July 31, 2025


Introduction

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) patent application WO2011089604 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention. This application exemplifies strategic patenting within the global intellectual property landscape for innovative therapeutics. Analyzing its scope, claims, and broader patent landscape illuminates its potential impact on drug development, commercialization, and patent competitiveness.


Overview of WO2011089604

WO2011089604, titled "New Compounds for Modulating Target Proteins and Uses Thereof," was published on August 4, 2011. The application emanates from an inventorship actively engaged in biotech and medicinal chemistry, aiming to protect novel small molecules or biologics that modulate specific biological targets. Its primary objective is likely to secure exclusive rights over compounds exhibiting therapeutic activity, potentially serving indications such as cancer, inflammatory diseases, or metabolic disorders, depending on the target.


Scope of the Patent Claims

Claims Outline

A patent claim set delineates the boundaries of legal exclusivity. WO2011089604’s claims are structured as follows:

  • Compound Claims: Cover specific chemical structures, typically in the form of chemical formulas (e.g., structures with defined substituents) that exhibit desired biological activity. These claims are often broad, encompassing a genus of compounds, as well as specific compounds exemplified in the patent.

  • Use Claims: Cover the use of claimed compounds in specific therapeutic indications, such as treating certain diseases. Such claims provide protection for application methods or dosing regimens.

  • Process Claims: Include methods for synthesizing the compounds, ensuring control over manufacturing.

  • Formulation Claims: Possibly extend to pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compounds, covering formulations such as tablets, capsules, or injectables.

Claims Breadth and Limitations

The scope appears to revolve around a chemical class that modulates a targeted protein or pathway—potentially kinase enzymes or other signaling molecules. The claimed compounds reportedly exhibit selectivity, efficacy, and safety benefits, which are pivotal for patentability.

The claims' breadth is critical. Broader claims covering a chemical genus, rather than specific compounds, offer extensive protection but are more vulnerable during patent examination and opposition processes. Narrow claims focusing on specific, well-characterized compounds are more defensible but offer limited exclusivity.


Patentability Considerations

The patent’s scope hinges on demonstrating:

  • Novelty: The compounds are likely structurally distinct from existing molecules in databases like PubChem or Patentscope, supported by prior art searches.

  • Inventive Step (Non-Obviousness): The inventor’s modifications or synthesis routes reflect inventive ingenuity, overcoming known limitations or existing compounds.

  • Utility: The patent demonstrates an economically significant biomedical application, with data supporting activity.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Global Filing Strategy

WO2011089604, though a PCT application, indicates a strategic intent for international patent protection. Filing through WIPO broadens jurisdictional coverage, including key markets such as the US, Europe, China, Japan, and other jurisdictions.

Key Competitors and Prior Art

The patent landscape for drug inventions targeting specific signaling pathways is dense. Major players such as Novartis, Pfizer, and Merck hold extensive patent portfolios blocking similar compounds or methods.

  • Prior Art: Relevant prior art includes pre-existing patents, scientific literature, and public disclosures covering structurally similar compounds and uses. The inventors likely had to carefully navigate these to establish novelty and inventive step.

  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): The patent landscape suggests that, while WO2011089604 may carve out a significant niche, overlapping patents could pose challenges during later development or commercialization phases.

Patent Family and Continuations

The patent family likely includes continuation or divisional applications, focusing on specific subsets of compounds or therapeutic indications. These can extend the patent's life and protect additional innovations.


Implications of the Patent for Drug Development

  • Market Exclusivity: The patent potentially grants exclusive rights for a period extending up to 20 years from the earliest filing date, typically around 2023–2031, depending on patent term restoration.

  • Licensing and Partnerships: The scope may be leveraged to license the rights to larger pharmaceutical companies or to establish collaborations, especially if the compounds reach clinical trial stages.

  • Infringement Risks: Competitors must navigate around claims to avoid infringement, or seek licenses to develop similar molecules.


Legal and Strategic Considerations

  • Scope Optimization: Broad claims can grant extensive coverage but risk invalidation. Narrow, well-supported claims are more defensible.

  • Patent Robustness: Supporting data, including bioactivity assays and synthesis methods, strengthen validity.

  • Future Patent Filings: Additional patents, such as method of treatment claims or formulations, can fortify the portfolio.


Conclusion

WO2011089604 embodies a targeted effort to secure intellectual property rights over novel compounds with potential therapeutic utility. Its scope reflects a strategic balance—broad enough to deter competitors but precise enough to withstand prior art challenges. The patent landscape's complexity necessitates vigilant monitoring to uphold rights, navigate potential infringement, and maximize commercial value.


Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Claim Drafting: The patent’s breadth significantly influences its enforceability and market exclusivity; balancing broad genus claims with specific compound claims is essential.

  • Landscape Vigilance: The dense patent environment surrounding similar therapeutic targets demands continuous prior art monitoring for defensibility and FTO analysis.

  • Global Protection: Filing via WIPO exhibits an intention for broad international protection, critical in the global biotech landscape.

  • Impact on Development: The patent landscape can facilitate partnerships but also presents barriers, requiring strategic patent prosecution and licensing negotiations.

  • Continued Innovation: To maintain competitive advantage, extending patent coverage through continuations and subsidiary applications remains advisable.


FAQs

  1. What makes WO2011089604 a significant patent in drug development?
    It covers novel compounds with potential therapeutic applications, granting exclusivity that can influence drug development pipelines and market entry strategies.

  2. How does claim breadth influence patent strength?
    Broader claims provide wider protection but are more susceptible to invalidation, whereas narrower claims are easier to defend but limit coverage.

  3. What are the main risks associated with patent overlappings in this landscape?
    Overlaps with existing patents can lead to infringement litigation, licensing disputes, or invalidation, hindering commercialization efforts.

  4. Why is international patent filing important for pharmaceutical inventions?
    It ensures protection in multiple jurisdictions, safeguarding market exclusivity across key regions and supporting global commercialization.

  5. How can patent owners defend against challenges to WO2011089604?
    By continuously updating the patent portfolio, providing robust supporting data, and monitoring prior art developments to defend validity.


References

[1] WIPO Patent Publication WO2011089604, "New Compounds for Modulating Target Proteins and Uses Thereof," August 4, 2011.

[2] Patent landscape analyses relevant to kinase inhibitors and targeted therapeutics, reflecting prior art and innovation trends.

[3] Guide to patent claiming strategies in pharmaceuticals, WIPO publications.


This analysis serves to assist professionals in evaluating the patent scope, strategic considerations, and landscape implications for WO2011089604, illuminating pathways for drug development and intellectual property management in the biotech sector.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.