You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Taiwan Patent: I574689


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Taiwan Patent: I574689

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 18, 2029 Bausch ZYCLARA imiquimod
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 30, 2030 Bausch ZYCLARA imiquimod
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 30, 2030 Bausch ZYCLARA imiquimod
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Taiwan Drug Patent TWI574689

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

Patent TWI574689 pertains to a pharmaceutical compound or formulation specific to Taiwan's patent regime. As part of strategic intellectual property (IP) management, understanding its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is crucial for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and market entry. This analysis provides a comprehensive review of TWI574689, emphasizing its legal boundaries, patent protections, and the competitive environment.


1. Patent Overview and Filing Background

Patent TWI574689 was filed under Taiwan’s Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) jurisdiction, aiming to secure exclusive rights over a novel drug or pharmaceutical formulation. While specific filing dates and applicant information are not provided here, typically, such patents are filed by innovating pharmaceutical companies or research institutions to establish territorial rights and safeguard R&D investments.

The patent likely targets a specific chemical entity, its method of synthesis, formulation, or therapeutic application. Taiwan’s patent law aligns with international standards, requiring novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. TWI574689's issuance signifies that the examiner found the claims meet these criteria.


2. Scope and Claims Analysis

a) Scope of the Patent

The scope encapsulated by TWI574689 hinges on the claims’ language. Broad, well-drafted claims can protect a wide array of derivatives, formulations, or uses, whereas narrow claims focus on specific embodiments.

Key considerations:

  • Chemical Composition Claims: These generally claim a specific compound or class thereof, possibly including salts, esters, or stereoisomers.
  • Method of Use or Treatment Claims: These cover the therapeutic application of the compound for certain indications.
  • Formulation Claims: May specify particular pharmaceutical forms (e.g., tablets, injectables) and excipients.
  • Synthesis or Manufacturing Claims: Cover specific processes for producing the drug, emphasizing novelty or efficiency improvements.

b) Claim Structure and Language

A typical patent claim set includes:

  • Independent Claims: Broader in scope, laying out the core invention—often a novel compound or a unique method.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, detailing specific embodiments, derivatives, or alternative formulations.

Analyzing TWI574689’s claims involves assessing:

  • Claim breadth: Are the claims written broadly to cover multiple compounds/formulations?
  • Claim specificity: Do they precisely define the chemical structure, stereochemistry, or synthesis pathways?
  • Use claims: Do they specify therapeutic methods, indicating protection over treatment methods?

Without access to the exact claim language, assumptions are general. However, it’s standard practice that patents aiming to maximize market coverage will include broad chemical and use claims, supplemented by narrow ones for specific embodiments.

c) Potential Claim Limitations

Limitations could include:

  • Narrow scope if claims specify particular substituents, stereochemistry, or specific formulations.
  • Exclusion of prior art if claims are unique enough, which appears to be the case considering Taiwan’s patent standards.

3. Patent Landscape Analysis

a) Competitive and Prior Art Environment

Taiwan’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is highly dynamic, with local and international players filing patents across diverse therapeutic areas, particularly in oncology, neurology, and infectious diseases.

  • Existing Patents: Prior to TWI574689, patents in similar chemical classes or indications could influence novelty and inventive step analyses. A landscape search would identify overlapping patents, potentially from major pharma companies or local biotech firms.

  • Parallel Patent Filings: Often, companies file corresponding applications in multiple jurisdictions—e.g., China, Japan, the US, to secure global protection. The patent family associated with TWI574689 might include PCT applications or national filings, providing broader territorial rights.

b) Patent Families and Related Applications

Patent families establish priority relationships and breadth. For TWI574689, related filings in jurisdictions sharing similar chemical entities or therapeutic areas create a layered patent landscape, affecting freedom-to-operate assessments.

  • Global patent family chain: Could include filings in China (CN), US (US), and Europe (EP).

  • Citing patents: Subsequent patents citing TWI574689 may indicate its influence or potential challenges to its claims.

c) Patent Validity and Challenges

  • Potential for Re-examination or Opposition: If the claims are broad, competitors or patent offices may challenge validity based on prior art.

  • Patent Term and Maintenance: Pharmaceutical patents typically last 20 years from filing, contingent on maintenance fees. Therapeutic patents tend to face patent cliffs earlier due to generics.


4. Strategic Implications

a) Intellectual Property Position

  • Innovation Strength: TWI574689’s scope suggests a focus on a novel compound or formulation with therapeutic significance. Broad claims bolster market exclusivity, but narrow claims can limit infringement risk.

  • Patent Lifecycle Management: Maintaining and enforcing the patent entails monitoring potential infringements, especially during the 20-year term.

  • Potential for Patent Thickets: Overlapping patents in the same class could create a dense IP environment, complicating commercialization strategies.

b) Market and Competitive Dynamics

  • Regulatory Approval Pathways: Valid patent coverage can support drug approval and marketing exclusivity.

  • Licensing and Partnership Opportunities: Strong patent rights enable licensing deals, especially in emerging markets across Asia.

  • Risk of Patent Infringement and Litigation: Broad claims may provoke infringement disputes, requiring strategic legal defenses.


5. Conclusions

Patents such as TWI574689 represent strategic IP assets that protect research investments and carve market exclusivity pathways within Taiwan. The patent claims, depending on their breadth and specificity, influence how effectively the patent deters competitors and enables commercialization.

A comprehensive understanding of its claims scope, especially through detailed claim analysis and patent landscape mapping, is vital for involved entities. As patents are often part of a broader portfolio, integrating TWI574689 into an overall IP strategy ensures sustainable competitive advantage.


Key Takeaways

  • Assess Claim Breadth Carefully: Broad claims enhance exclusivity but may invite validity challenges.
  • Map the Patent Landscape: Identify overlapping technology and potential infringers through geographic patent family analysis.
  • Monitor Patent Lifecycle: Maintain and enforce patent rights proactively to maximize commercial opportunity.
  • Strategic Portfolio Building: Use TWI574689 as a foundation, complementing with additional patents to strengthen market position.
  • Legal Vigilance: Be aware of potential patent challenges or licensing opportunities arising from the patent’s scope and claims.

FAQs

Q1: What is the typical scope of a pharmaceutical patent like TWI574689?
A1: It often covers a specific chemical compound, its method of synthesis, formulation, or therapeutic use, with scope defined by the language of its claims. Broad claims seek to encompass a wide class of derivatives or applications, while narrow claims aim at specific embodiments.

Q2: How does Taiwan's patent landscape influence drug patenting strategies?
A2: Taiwan's patent system emphasizes strict novelty and inventive step standards, encouraging applicants to craft clear, strong claims. The landscape is competitive, with local and international players filing aggressively, necessitating comprehensive patent family strategies.

Q3: Can broad claims in TWI574689 be challenged?
A3: Yes. Broad claims are more susceptible to invalidation if prior art demonstrates lack of novelty or obviousness. Patent examiners or third parties can challenge validity during re-examination or opposition procedures.

Q4: How important are patent landscapes in drug development?
A4: They are critical for identifying freedom-to-operate, avoiding infringement, discovering licensing opportunities, and understanding the competitive environment.

Q5: What steps should a company take to leverage TWI574689 effectively?
A5: Maintain and enforce the patent, monitor competitor filings and potential infringements, expand protection through related patent applications, and integrate the patent into broader commercialization and licensing strategies.


References

  1. Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO). Patent Application Details for TWI574689.
  2. WIPO PatentScope Database. Patent family and international filing data.
  3. World Patent Data. Analysis of patent landscapes in pharmaceutical technology.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.