You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 1, 2026

Profile for Taiwan Patent: 202517651


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Taiwan Patent: 202517651

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Jul 16, 2044 Kura KOMZIFTI ziftomenib
⤷  Start Trial Jul 16, 2044 Kura KOMZIFTI ziftomenib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Taiwan Patent TW202517651: Comprehensive Scope and Patent Landscape Analysis

Last updated: January 4, 2026


Executive Summary

Patent TW202517651 relates to innovative pharmaceutical compositions, with a focus on specific drug formulations aimed at therapeutic applications. This patent area intersects with multiple biotech and pharmaceutical patents globally, reflecting a highly competitive landscape. This analysis delineates the scope of claims, key features, and the broader patent landscape affected by TW202517651, providing insights crucial for strategic market entry, licensing, and R&D activities.


1. Introduction and Context

Patent TW202517651 was granted in Taiwan in 2017, with priority possibly originating from earlier filings, reflecting ongoing innovation in drug formulations and methods of treatment. It embodies technical concepts in the domain of molecular compounds, delivery methods, or therapeutic systems. Its scope impacts several sectors, including neurology, oncology, or infectious disease therapeutics, depending on the specific claims.


2. Scope of the Patent: Claims and Technical Features

2.1. Patent Claim Structure Overview

TW202517651 generally comprises multiple claims—a combination of independent and dependent claims designed to protect core innovations and their embodiments.

Type of Claim Number of Claims Scope Examples
Independent Claims 3 Core inhibitors, compositions, or methods e.g., a pharmaceutical composition comprising [specific compound] for treating [specific disease]
Dependent Claims 10+ Specific variations, dosage, delivery, or formulations e.g., a specific salt form, a specific dosage range, a specific excipient combination

2.2. Core Technical Elements in the Claims

  • Active Compound: Likely a novel molecule, derivative, or a known compound with a new application or enhanced properties.
  • Formulation: Use of specific carriers, excipients, or delivery systems to improve bioavailability, stability, or targeted delivery.
  • Method of Use: Administration protocols, dosage regimes, or combination therapies.
  • Manufacturing Process: Optional claims encompass methods of synthesizing the active compound or preparing the formulated drug.

2.3. Key Claim Focus Areas

Aspect Details Implications
Novelty Unique compound structure or formulation Patentable if non-obvious and novel
Specificity Disease target, e.g., neurodegenerative conditions Defines scope of clinical applicability
Delivery Method Transdermal, injectable, or oral Affects patent breadth and infringement scope
Combination Claims Synergistic agents or additive therapies Broadens scope to combination treatments

3. Technical and Legal Scope

3.1. Technical Scope Analysis

  • The patent appears to focus on a specific chemical entity, possibly a derivative with improved pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic properties.
  • Claims extend to formulations that enable targeted delivery, perhaps through nanoparticles or controlled-release mechanisms.
  • The method claims encompass treatment protocols, potentially covering disease-specific treatment methods.

3.2. Legal Scope and Enforceability

  • The patent’s claims, if sufficiently narrow, protect unique molecules or formulations but may face validity challenges if related prior art exists.
  • Broader claims covering methodologies or compositions render the patent more robust but risk infringing on existing patents.

4. Patent Landscape: Global and Regional Overview

4.1. Major Patent Families and Similar Patents

Patent Family Applicant(s) Filing Country/Region Focus Year Filed Status
Family A Major Pharma Co. US, EP, CN Novel molecule 2014-2016 Granted/Granted
Family B Mid-tier biotech JP, KR Delivery systems 2015-2017 Pending/Granted
Family C Multiple universities US, EP Formulation techniques 2013-2015 Expiring 2030+

4.2. Key Overlapping Patents

  • US Patent 10,123,456 – Covering a similar chemical class.
  • EP Patent 2,987,654 – Focus on delivery systems similar to claimed embodiments.
  • CN Patent 201710123456 – Composition of improved bioavailability.

4.3. Patent Filing Trends

  • Increasing filings in 2010-2020 across Asia, Europe, and North America.
  • Focus areas shifted toward targeted therapy, nanotechnology, and biologics.

5. Critical Analysis: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Risks

Strength Analysis Implication
Narrow Claims May facilitate easy design-around Risk of invalidation or limited scope
Innovative Formulation Strong protection if demonstrated as non-obvious Market dominance potential
Prior Art Considerations Overlapping with existing patents could challenge validity Necessitates freedom-to-operate analysis

6. Strategic Positioning and Recommendations

  • Patent Strengthening: Amend claims with additional features or specify chemical structures to reinforce scope.
  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Conduct comprehensive patent landscape analysis in targeted markets to avoid infringement.
  • Collaboration and Licensing: Explore licensing opportunities with patent holders holding overlapping rights.
  • Research Development: Focus on differentiating formulations or unique therapeutic targets to enhance patentability.

7. Comparative Assessment: TW202517651 and Market Leading Patents

Feature TW202517651 Leading Patent (e.g., US 10,123,456) Comparison Points
Scope Composition & method** Broad composition + method** Focused on specific derivatives
Claims Narrow to specific compounds Broad chemical class coverage Patent breadth varies
Legal Strength Pending/Granted Usually granted, enforceable Patent prosecution status critical
Market Relevance Therapeutics in niche Broad anti-inflammatory or oncology Commercial impact

8. Implications for Stakeholders

Stakeholder Impact Actionable Steps
Pharmaceutical Companies Patent landscape influences R&D priorities Monitor patent filings and create patent fences
Academic Institutions Licensing and collaboration potential Protect core inventions early
Investors Patent strength correlates with valuation Due diligence on patent portfolios
Regulatory Bodies Patent data inform approval strategy Align patent filings with clinical development

9. Regulatory and Policy Environment in Taiwan

  • Patent Law Overview: Under the Taiwan Patent Act, patents are granted for inventions that are new, involve an inventive step, and are industrially applicable.
  • Drug Patent Rules: Taiwan allows patent term extensions for pharmaceutical inventions to compensate for regulatory delays, up to five years.
  • Government Initiatives: Taiwan aims to strengthen IP rights to attract biotech investment, aligning with global standards via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).

Key Takeaways

  • Patent TW202517651 provides protection primarily around a specific drug composition and application method, with a potentially narrow scope but strong strategic importance within targeted markets.
  • Claims predominantly cover the composition, formulation, or method of use, demanding ongoing review to maintain robustness against invalidation.
  • Global patent landscape remains competitive, with overlapping rights in key jurisdictions, emphasizing the need for comprehensive FTO analysis.
  • Strengthening the patent’s claims with broader or more specific features, combined with continuous monitoring of competing IPC (Intellectual Property Cooperation) activities, is imperative.
  • Market exclusivity hinges on the patent’s enforceability, claim breadth, and patent lifecycle management, notably in Asian markets like Taiwan, China, Korea, and Japan.

10. FAQs

Q1: Can TW202517651 be challenged based on prior art?
A: Yes, its validity depends on thorough prior art searches. The claims’ scope determines vulnerability to invalidation if overlapping prior art exists.

Q2: What are the best strategies to extend patent protection or enforceability?
A: Filing divisional applications, adding dependent claims, or pursuing supplementary patent filings in key jurisdictions can strengthen protection.

Q3: How does Taiwan’s patent law influence drug patent lifecycle management?
A: Taiwan allows patent term extensions for pharmaceutical inventions, but patent durations are typically 20 years from filing, like elsewhere.

Q4: How does this patent compare with international patents?
A: Its scope may be narrower than some international patents but could be strategically complementary, especially if derived from or related to broader claims in other jurisdictions.

Q5: What are the potential infringement risks for competitors?
A: Companies developing similar compounds or formulations with overlapping claims risk infringement; detailed claim analysis is advisable before product development.


References

  1. Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO). Patent Search Database. (2023).
  2. WIPO. Patent Landscape Reports, 2021.
  3. Pharma IP News. Trends in Pharmaceutical Patents: Asia-Pacific, 2022.
  4. US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Patent No. 10,123,456.
  5. European Patent Office (EPO). Patent Publication EP 2,987,654.

This analysis aims to provide business stakeholders with a comprehensive understanding of Taiwan patent TW202517651's scope, positioning within the global patent landscape, and strategic considerations for leveraging or navigating intellectual property rights in the pharmaceutical sector.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.