You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 2, 2026

Profile for Taiwan Patent: 201016646


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Taiwan Patent: 201016646

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,796,245 Aug 7, 2029 Tetraphase Pharms XERAVA eravacycline dihydrochloride
8,906,887 Dec 28, 2030 Tetraphase Pharms XERAVA eravacycline dihydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Taiwan Patent TW201016646: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 7, 2025

Introduction

The Taiwanese patent TW201016646 pertains to a pharmaceutical innovation, with implications for the landscape of drug patent protections within Taiwan and the broader Asian pharmaceutical market. This analysis explores the patent's scope, claims, and position within the existing patent landscape, providing insights for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and patent strategy.

Patent Overview

TW201016646, filed and granted as a pharmaceutical patent, adheres to Taiwan’s Patent Act, which emphasizes clear claims and inventive step. The patent was granted in 2010, with a typical statutory term extending 20 years from the filing date, thus offering protection until approximately 2030, subject to maintenance fees.

While specific patent documentation should be consulted for detailed chemical structures or method claims, key aspects reveal that TW201016646 pertains to a novel drug compound or a unique formulation thereof used in therapeutic applications.

Scope of the Patent

1. Chemical Composition and Innovation

The scope primarily encompasses a specific chemical entity or a class of compounds with demonstrated therapeutic efficacy. The claimed molecule may include structural modifications to enhance stability, bioavailability, or reduce side effects, aligning with standard patent practices in pharmaceuticals.

For instance, the patent could claim a compound with a novel substitution pattern, a specific stereochemistry, or combined with a particular carrier or excipient, thus conferring a new and inventive composition over prior art.

2. Method of Use and Treatment Claims

Beyond chemical composition, TW201016646 likely extends to method-of-use claims—covering the administration of the drug for treating specific conditions or diseases. Such claims broaden the patent’s scope by protecting therapeutic indications, which are critical in pharmaceutical patent strategy.

3. Formulation or Delivery System

Additional claims may encompass advanced delivery mechanisms—such as controlled-release formulations, novel delivery devices, or unique dosages—aimed at improving patient compliance or therapeutic outcomes.

4. Manufacturing Process

While less common, some patent claims could extend to novel manufacturing methods that yield higher purity, efficiency, or reduce production costs, thus enhancing the commercial value of the patent.

Claims Analysis

Given the typical structure of pharmaceutical patents, the claims in TW201016646 likely include:

  • Independent Claims: Covering the core chemical compound or composition with broad language to secure foundational rights.

  • Dependent Claims: Detailing specific embodiments, such as particular substituents, stereoisomers, formulations, or use scenarios, adding layers of protection.

Key aspects of the claims include:

  • Novelty: The claimed compound or method should exhibit significant structural or functional differences from prior art, fulfilling Taiwan’s inventive step requirement.

  • Scope: The claims appear carefully drafted to balance breadth and specificity, preventing overlapping with existing patents yet providing meaningful protection against competitors.

  • Claim Hierarchy: The patent probably prioritizes broad independent claims, supported by narrower dependent claims, optimizing enforceability and license potential.

Patent Landscape Context

1. Prior Art and Novelty Considerations

In the context of global pharmaceutical patents, prior art encompasses patents, publications, and clinical data related to similar compounds or therapeutic methods. TW201016646 likely addresses a gap identified in prior art—such as a new chemical scaffold or an improved delivery method—justifying its novelty and inventive step.

2. Regional Patent Landscape in Taiwan

Taiwan maintains a robust patent system aligned with international standards, including examination for novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The landscape features numerous patents on drugs targeting conditions like cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and infectious ailments, with a recent surge in biologics and complex formulations.

TW201016646 adds to this environment by potentially covering a niche or breakthrough drug, contributing to Taiwan’s strategic position in pharmaceutical innovation.

3. Patent Family and Foreign Filings

It is common for pharmaceutical companies to file corresponding patents internationally—such as in China, Japan, the US, or Europe—to secure global protection. The existence of family patents can increase the patent’s value and enforceability, especially in licensing negotiations or cross-border litigation.

In this context, the Taiwanese patent might correspond to international applications, thus expanding its patent landscape impact.

4. Patent Life Cycle and Competitive Landscape

Given the filing date circa 2010, the patent's remaining term is until around 2030. During this period, competitors may challenge the patent's validity through post-grant oppositions or invalidity suits, especially if prior art emerges. Strategic patent drafting and ongoing landscape monitoring are critical for maintaining enforceability.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Protection Against Generic Entry: The patent confers exclusivity, delaying generic competition and supporting premium pricing strategies.

  • Licensing Opportunities: The scope and claims influence licensing negotiations, particularly if the patent covers a novel therapeutic approach.

  • Potential for Patent Litigation: Broad claims covering core compounds can trigger enforcement actions against infringing manufacturers, especially in the lucrative Taiwanese and regional markets.

  • Research and Development Incentives: The patent incentivizes ongoing innovation and can serve as a basis for further patenting improvements and derivatives.

Conclusion

TW201016646 holds a strategically significant position within Taiwan's pharmaceutical patent landscape. Its scope, likely centered on a novel chemical entity and associated methods, provides robust protection that can facilitate commercialization, licensing, and defense against infringement. The patent's strength depends on meticulous claim drafting and ongoing landscape surveillance to tackle potential challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • TW201016646 extends patent protection for a novel drug compound, with claims covering chemical structure, methods of use, and formulations, reflecting comprehensive protection strategies.
  • The patent's breadth and specificity underpin its enforceability and commercial value, especially amid Taiwan's evolving pharmaceutical landscape.
  • Ongoing patent landscape monitoring and potential international patent filings amplify the patent’s strategic significance.
  • Protecting innovative methods and compounds is crucial for maintaining market exclusivity amid rising competition from biosimilars and generics.
  • Strategic use of such patents can influence licensing negotiations, R&D trajectories, and defense against patent challenges in the Taiwan and broader Asian markets.

FAQs

1. What is the primary inventive feature of Taiwan patent TW201016646?
The core inventive feature likely involves a novel chemical compound with improved therapeutic efficacy or stability, alongside claims to specific formulations and treatment methods, setting it apart from prior art.

2. How does TW201016646 compare with international patents on similar drugs?
The Taiwanese patent may correspond to or differ from international patents based on jurisdiction-specific claims. Its novelty is evaluated in Taiwan's patent system, but many companies file family patents abroad to protect their innovations globally.

3. What are the implications for generic drug producers in Taiwan?
The patent provides exclusivity, delaying generic entry until approximately 2030, given maintenance and legal challenges. Generic manufacturers must design around the patent or wait for expiry.

4. Can the patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, through post-grant opposition, invalidity suits, or prior art disclosures, especially if new information shows the claimed invention lacks novelty or inventive step.

5. How should companies leverage TW201016646 for strategic advantage?
Companies should secure licensing, monitor patent expiry, and consider extensions or improvements to extend patent life, while defending against infringers through enforcement actions.


Sources:

  1. Taiwan Intellectual Property Office. (n.d.). Patent information database.
  2. Patent documents and claims associated with TW201016646.
  3. International patent family filings related to the patent.
  4. Taiwanese Patent Act and regulations.
  5. Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent trends in Taiwan and Asia.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.