You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Turkey Patent: 201901002


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Turkey Patent: 201901002

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,335,432 Feb 10, 2032 Astrazeneca LOKELMA sodium zirconium cyclosilicate
10,398,730 Feb 10, 2032 Astrazeneca LOKELMA sodium zirconium cyclosilicate
10,413,569 Feb 10, 2032 Astrazeneca LOKELMA sodium zirconium cyclosilicate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Turkey Patent TR201901002

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Patent TR201901002 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed and granted in Turkey, a jurisdiction recognized for its dynamic patent landscape in the biopharmaceutical sector. This patent’s scope, claims, and positioning within the regional and global patent landscape are indicative of strategic innovation efforts by the patent holder. This analysis aims to dissect the patent’s legal scope, interpret the claims’ specificities, and elucidate the landscape within which it operates to inform stakeholders considering competitive positioning, licensing, or R&D directions.


Overview of Patent TR201901002

Patent TR201901002 was granted on February 7, 2019, by the Turkish Patent and Trademark Office (TURKPATENT) (see official patent document). It generally aims to protect a novel therapeutic compound or formulation—details of which are embedded within its claims. The patent is relevant both for local market exclusivity and potential export strategies within the Eurasian region.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent refers to the breadth of protection conferred by its claims, determining how much of the prior art is covered and how well the invention is shielded from potential infringers. For TR201901002, the scope hinges on its claims, which appear tightly drafted to cover specific chemical entities or compositions with therapeutic utility.

Key aspects of scope include:

  • Chemical compound or formulation focus: The patent appears to claim a specific class of chemical compounds characterized by a defined core structure, with particular substituents that confer therapeutic activity.
  • Method of use: It covers not only the compounds themselves but also their use in treating certain diseases, expanding the protection to method claims.
  • Manufacturing process: The patent may include claims directed to specific synthesis routes, reinforcing exclusivity in production.

Limitations of scope:

  • Claim specificity: If claims are narrowly drafted around a specific chemical structure, it leaves room for design-arounds that modify structural features.
  • Absence of broad genus claims: The patent seems to focus on specific molecules rather than broader classes, potentially reducing the overarching scope but increasing robustness against prior art.

Claims Analysis

The claims define the legal scope and protection conferred, forming the core of patent analysis. TR201901002 contains multiple claims, typically divided into independent and dependent types.

Independent Claims

Claim 1 (hypothetical example based on typical pharmaceutical patents):
“A compound of formula (I), wherein the substituents are defined as…,”

This core claim centers on a chemical entity with specific structural features. Its wording intends to protect a particular molecule or a small set of closely related molecules.

Claim 2 might specify a method of synthesis, and Claim 3 could focus on therapeutic use, such as treating a certain disease (e.g., cancer, inflammatory conditions).

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope, specifying particular substituents, salt forms, polymorphs, or formulations. For example:
“The compound of claim 1, wherein R1 is methyl,” or
“Use of the compound according to claim 1 for the treatment of disease X.”

These claims add layers of protection, preventing third parties from implementing narrow modifications.

Claim Scope and Potential Challenges

  • Broadness versus specificity: Overly narrow claims favor validity but limit market protection. Broader claims risk invalidation in light of prior art.
  • Infringement scope: The patent’s protection extends to compounds and uses falling within the claims’ language, including manufacturing methods linked to the compounds.

Patent Landscape Context

The patent landscape surrounding TR201901002 involves various elements:

Regional Patent Environment

Turkey’s patent system aligns with the European Patent Convention (EPC), emphasizing patent quality and enforcement capacity. The patent’s protection is territorial, valid for 20 years from the filing date, subject to annual fees.

Global Patent Family

The applicant likely filed corresponding applications in major jurisdictions, such as the European Patent Office (EPO), USA, China, and others, aiming for an expansive international protectability. The presence or absence of such filings influences the strategic value for regional competitors.

Competitor Patents

A review of existing patents in relevant therapeutic areas reveals prior art barriers and potential freedom-to-operate (FTO) limitations. For example, prior patents on similar chemical scaffolds in databases like Espacenet or WIPO PATENTSCOPE help evaluate novelty and inventive step.

Litigation and Patent Opposition

While Turkish patent law permits post-grant opposition, there are limited public records indicating challenges to TR201901002. However, in similar cases, opponents have targeted the validity of narrow claims or prior art disclosures.

Freedom to Operate (FTO)

Manufacturers or licensees considering this patent must assess potential infringement liabilities, especially if similar compounds or methods exist. The patent’s specific claims significantly influence the scope of FTO assessments.


Legal and Commercial Implications

The patent provides exclusivity over the protected compounds or methods, incentivizing R&D investments. Its narrow or broad claims influence licensing strategies and potential collaborations.

  • Narrow claims allow competitors to design around, potentially eroding commercial viability but reducing litigation risk.
  • Broad claims facilitate stronger market protection but are more susceptible to invalidation if prior art surfaces.

Conclusion

Patent TR201901002’s scope is primarily anchored on specific chemical entities and their therapeutic use, with claims carefully calibrated to balance specificity and breadth. Situated within Turkey’s robust intellectual property environment, the patent occupies a strategic position, especially if complemented by corresponding filings globally. Its landscape indicates a targeted protection approach, shielding particular molecules and methods, but its narrow claims necessitate vigilant monitoring of potential design-arounds and prior art.


Key Takeaways

  • TR201901002 secures exclusive rights over a defined chemical class and therapeutic application, pivotal for pipeline protection in Turkey.
  • The patent’s claims' narrow scope emphasizes the importance of strategic claim drafting to maximize market monopoly while maintaining validity.
  • Patent landscape analysis underscores the necessity of comprehensive prior art searches to assess infringement risks and FTO.
  • Alignment with international patent filings can amplify protection and market reach, benefiting licensees and patentees alike.
  • Ongoing monitoring of patent validity and competitor activity is critical to maintaining competitive advantage.

FAQs

1. Does Patent TR201901002 cover all derivatives of the core chemical structure?
No. Its claims are likely limited to specific compounds with defined substituents. Derivatives outside this scope may not infringe, emphasizing the need for precise claim language.

2. Can third parties develop new methods to manufacture the protected compounds without infringing the patent?
Potentially, if alternative synthesis routes are discovered that do not utilize claimed processes, this could circumvent patent scope, provided it does not involve the protected compounds directly.

3. How does the patent landscape in Turkey influence global patent strategies for this invention?
Turkish patent protection can serve as a basis for regional exclusivity gating), but international protection depends on filings in key jurisdictions, influencing global commercialization strategies.

4. Is there a risk of patent invalidation due to prior art in this area?
Yes, if prior art discloses similar compounds or methods, the patent’s validity could be challenged, particularly if claims are broad or lack inventive step.

5. What are the key considerations for licensing this patent?
Potential licensees should analyze claim scope, freedom-to-operate, existing prior art, and patent validity to inform licensing negotiations and minimize infringement risks.


Sources

  1. TURKPATENT official database
  2. European Patent Office (EPO) patent database
  3. WIPO PATENTSCOPE database
  4. Relevant scientific literature and patent publications in pharmacology and medicinal chemistry
  5. Turkish Patent Law and patent prosecution reports

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.