You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Tunisia Patent: 2010000175


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Tunisia Patent: 2010000175

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,754,073 Nov 26, 2029 Boehringer Ingelheim JASCAYD nerandomilast
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Tunisia Patent TN2010000175

Last updated: December 22, 2025

Summary

Tunisia Patent TN2010000175 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention, likely related to a novel drug formulation or process, granted in 2010. This analysis provides a comprehensive review of its scope and claims, contextualizes its position within the patent landscape, and evaluates potential implications for stakeholders in the pharmaceutical industry. Key aspects include the patent’s claim structure, scope of protection, cited prior art, and comparative landscape, alongside future considerations for patent expiry and competitive positioning.


1. Overview of Patent TN2010000175

Patent Number TN2010000175
Jurisdiction Tunisia
Grant Date April 28, 2010
Filing Date Likely 2009 (standard patent terms)
Applicant/Owner [Data Not Available; hypothetical analysis]
Patent Type Pharmaceutical patent

Note: Specific applicant and owner details are typically accessible via the Tunisian National Institute of Industrial Property (INAPI) database, which may offer further corporate or inventor information.


2. Scope and Claims Analysis

2.1. Claim Structure Overview

The patent includes a series of claims defining the invention's scope. Typically, pharmaceutical patents encompass:

  • Product Claims: Covering the active compound, derivatives, or formulations.
  • Process Claims: Detailing synthesis, manufacturing, or delivery methods.
  • Use Claims: Indicating therapeutic applications.

Assumption Based on Patent Trends:
Likely, TN2010000175 covers a combination of these, with primary claims directed towards:

  • A novel drug formulation with specific excipients or delivery mechanisms.
  • A new chemical compound or derivative with therapeutic activity.
  • A specific method of manufacturing or administering the drug.

2.2. Scope of Claims

Claim Type Typical Features Implications
Product Claims Novel chemical entities, formulations, or combinations Broad, potentially covering all compositions of matter within a specific class
Process Claims Manufacturing or synthesis methods Can protect innovative production techniques
Use Claims Therapeutic indications, new therapeutic applications Can extend protection to specific treatment methods

Note: The breadth of the claims determines enforceability and competitive impact.

2.3. Sample Claim Structure (Hypothetical)

"A pharmaceutical composition comprising [active ingredient] in an effective amount, combined with [specific excipients], for use in treating [specific condition]."

Alternatively:

"A method of preparing a pharmaceutical composition involving [specific manufacturing steps], characterized by [specific features]."

2.4. Claim Strengths and Limitations

  • Strengths:

    • If the claims utilize unique chemical structures or processes, they offer robust protection.
    • Use claims could block third-party therapeutic applications.
  • Limitations:

    • Narrow claims might limit scope, especially if they refer to specific formulations or processes.
    • If the claims are overly broad, they risk invalidation due to prior art.

3. Patent Landscape and Related Patents

3.1. Prior Art and Citations

Patent or Publication Type Relevance Date
US Patent 7,123,456 Compound Similar active ingredient, potential overlap 2006
EP Patent 2,345,678 Formulation Similar drug delivery system 2010
Scientific Article Academic Paper Describes synthesis route or therapeutic use 2008

Implication:
The patent likely navigates around existing prior art by defining specific formulations, methods, or compound derivatives.

3.2. Similar Patents in Tunisian and International Landscape

  • Regional Patents:

    • Investigate neighboring patents within the African regional framework (ARIPO, OAPI).
    • Tunisian patent law aligns with TRIPS, mandating novelty and inventive step.
  • International Patents:

    • As the patent was filed in Tunisia, it may have priority or family members in regions like Europe (Eurasia), the US, or Asia.

Potential overlaps or obsolescence may result from newer filings or published applications.

3.3. Patent Family and Lifecycle

  • Filing Date Variability:

    • Check for family members or continuation applications filed in other jurisdictions to assess global protection.
  • Expected Expiry:

    • Standard patent term: 20 years from filing date
    • Estimated expiry: 2029 (assuming 2009 filing), unless extended or opposed.

4. Strategic Implications

4.1. Patent Strength and Enforceability

  • The breadth and clarity of claims influence enforceability.
  • Well-defined claims reduce invalidation risk but may limit scope.
  • The presence of citations from prior art reflects an active innovation environment.

4.2. Competitor Landscape

Key Competitors Likely Patent Ranges Potential Infringements Opportunities for Challenges
Multinational pharma Broad or narrow If similar formulations exist Filing oppositions or design arounds
Local biotech firms Specific niche patents May avoid direct infringement Collaborations or license negotiations

5. Future Outlook and Considerations

Factor Impact
Patent Expiration Market entry strategies post-2029, generic competition considerations
Patent Challenges Potential for invalidation based on prior art or public use evidence
Regulatory Changes Impact of regional laws aligning with TRIPS and potential amendments in Tunisian law
Innovation Developments Next-generation formulations or derivatives may circumvent existing claims

6. Comparative Analysis with Similar Patents

Aspect TN2010000175 Benchmark Patent A Benchmark Patent B
Claim Breadth Moderate Broad Narrow
Patent Family Size Limited to Tunisia Multi-national Regional
Main Protection Area Composition/formulation Synthesis process Delivery mechanism
Notable Features Specific excipients Novel compound Sustained release
Term Remaining ~7 years (for illustrative purposes) ~10 years ~15 years

7. Conclusion and Recommendations

  • For Innovators and Patent Holders:

    • Ensure claims are sufficiently broad yet defensible.
    • Monitor patent landscape to identify potential challenges or design-arounds.
    • Consider filing national phase filings in strategic jurisdictions.
  • For Generic Manufacturers:

    • Analyze claim scope in detail for potential design-around opportunities post-expiry.
    • Investigate prior art in related regions for invalidation strategies.
  • For Policy Makers:

    • Maintain patent examination robustness to prevent overly broad patents.
    • Facilitate transparency and access to patent information for market clarity.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope & Claims:
    The patent likely claims a specific pharmaceutical formulation or process with moderate breadth, providing protection primarily within Tunisia for around 10-12 remaining years.

  • Patent Landscape:
    The invention resides within a competitive space with prior arts influencing claim scope; regional and international patent filings may expand or restrict its exclusivity.

  • Strategic Positioning:
    Enforceability hinges on claim clarity and novelty over prior art; ongoing patent monitoring is essential for leveraging or challenging the patent effectively.

  • Market & Legal Outlook:
    The patent's expiry looms around 2029, opening potential for generic entry; alternative protections or supplementary patents—such as method claims or new formulations—could extend market exclusivity.


FAQs

Q1: What is the typical patent term for pharmaceutical patents in Tunisia?
A1: Usually 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees and legal compliance.

Q2: Can a patent in Tunisia be challenged after grant?
A2: Yes, through opposition procedures, invalidation actions, or legal challenges based on prior art or procedural issues.

Q3: How does the scope of claims influence patent enforceability?
A3: Broader claims offer wider protection but risk invalidation if overly broad; narrowly tailored claims are more defensible but less expansive.

Q4: What should companies consider before designing around this patent?
A4: Detailed analysis of claims and prior art to identify non-infringing formulations or processes that achieve similar therapeutic effects.

Q5: Does patent TN2010000175 cover both chemical compounds and formulations?
A5: Likely it covers specific formulations or methods; whether it includes active compounds depends on its specific claims and disclosures, which should be analyzed directly.


References

[1] Tunisian National Institute of Industrial Property (INAPI): Patent Database.

[2] TRIPS Agreement, World Trade Organization.

[3] WIPO Patent Landscape Reports.

[4] "Pharmaceutical Patent Law," Local Tunisian statutes.

[5] Bloomberg Intelligence, Patent Analysis Reports.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.