You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 14, 2025

Profile for Slovenia Patent: 2989106


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Slovenia Patent: 2989106

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 22, 2034 Beone Medicines Usa BRUKINSA zanubrutinib
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 22, 2034 Beone Medicines Usa BRUKINSA zanubrutinib
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 22, 2034 Beone Medicines Usa BRUKINSA zanubrutinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Slovenia Drug Patent SI2989106

Last updated: August 3, 2025

Introduction

Patent SI2989106, granted in Slovenia, represents a significant innovation in the pharmaceutical sector. Its scope and claims shape its enforceability and strategic value within the pharmaceutical patent landscape. This analysis provides an in-depth overview of the patent’s scope, specific claims, and the broader patent landscape relevant to this patent, offering essential insights for patent professionals, pharmaceutical companies, and stakeholders involved in drug development and patent management.

Patent Overview

Patent Number: SI2989106
Jurisdiction: Slovenia
Grant Date: [Insert date if known]
Patent Type: National Patent
Application Filing Date: [Insert date if known]
Priority Date: [Insert date if known]

This patent appears to cover a novel pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or method—details crucial for comprehensive evaluation. The scope of protection hinges on the claims, which define the territorial rights and permissible interpretations.


Scope of the Patent

Legal Basis and Scope Definition

In Slovenia, patent scope is primarily defined by the claims, which are interpreted broadly to encompass equivalents unless explicitly limited. The description and drawings support claim interpretation and provide context for the invention’s technical field.

Core Focus

Based on available patent documentation, SI2989106 seems to delineate a novel chemical entity or formulation with improved therapeutic efficacy or unique manufacturing features. Its scope likely extends to:

  • Chemical compounds: Specific molecular structures, including derivatives or analogs.
  • Pharmaceutical formulations: Compositions containing the patented compound with specific excipients or delivery systems.
  • Methods of use: Particular therapeutic methods, such as indications or treatment regimes involving the compound.
  • Manufacturing processes: Novel processes for synthesizing the compound or formulation.

Geographic and Legal Implications

Since SI2989106 is a Slovenian patent, its direct enforceability applies within Slovenia. However, given Slovenia’s participation in the European Patent Convention (EPC), patent families or regional counterparts can extend protection across Europe, subject to national validation.


Claims Analysis

Types of Claims

The patent’s claims can be categorized into:

  • Compound Claims: Cover specific chemical structures or classes.
  • Use Claims: Encompass methods of treatment or diagnostic methods involving the compound.
  • Formulation Claims: Protect particular compositions or delivery methods.
  • Process Claims: Protect manufacturing techniques.

Claim Language and Scope

1. Compound Claims:
Typically narrow, focusing on specific molecular structures with defined substituents. For example, a claim may specify a chemical formula with unique substitutions that confer particular pharmacological activity.

2. Use Claims:
These often safeguard the therapeutic application, such as "use of compound X for treating condition Y." Use claims are pivotal for maintaining exclusivity in specific therapeutic areas.

3. Formulation Claims:
Could specify dosage forms, excipient combinations, or delivery systems that optimize bioavailability or stability.

4. Process Claims:
Usually more technical, claiming innovative synthesis routes that improve yield, purity, or cost-effectiveness.

Claim Breadth and Validity

The scope’s strength depends on the claim language specificity:

  • Narrow Claims: More defensible but limited in scope.
  • Broad Claims: Offer extensive coverage but risk invalidation if overly broad or anticipated by prior art.

Thus, assessing SI2989106’s validity involves comparing claims against existing chemical, pharmaceutical, and method patents.


Patent Landscape Context

Global Patent Filings and Patent Families

Key considerations include:

  • Priority and Family Applications:
    If initial filings are in regions like the US, EP, or CN, the patent family may extend protection across major markets, increasing strategic value.

  • Patent Strength and Enforceability:
    A well-drafted patent with specific claims aligned to the invention and robust descriptions tends to be more defendable; broad claims require support and innovative features.

  • Major Competitors:
    Large pharmaceutical firms—such as Novartis, Roche, or Merck—often pursue similar compounds or formulations, requiring additional patent fencing to secure market exclusivity.

Prior Art and Patent Citations

The patent landscape includes:

  • Prior Chemical Patents:
    Related compounds or derivatives that could challenge the novelty or inventive step of SI2989106.

  • Technology Trends:
    Emerging therapies, targeted delivery systems, or combination treatments relevant to the patent’s scope.

  • Litigation and Patent Examination Reports:
    Reexamination, oppositions, or patent challenges influence enforceability and invalidation risks.

Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

Any company seeking to develop or commercialize a drug similar to SI2989106 must evaluate existing patents for potential infringement. The non-explicit language of claims or overlapping claims may result in licensing requirements or design-around strategies.


Strategic Insights

  • Patent Robustness:
    Claims with specific chemical structures supported by comprehensive descriptions are less vulnerable.
  • Regional Applicability:
    Leveraging national protections in Slovenia and extending via EPC or PCT applications can maximize coverage.
  • Competitive Analysis:
    Monitoring patent filings filed by competitors aids in avoiding infringement and identifying licensing opportunities.
  • Lifecycle Management:
    Supplementing with narrow, follow-up patents around manufacturing methods or new indications prolongs market exclusivity.

Key Takeaways

  • Claim Specificity is Crucial: Narrow, well-supported claims enhance enforceability, while broad claims risk invalidation.
  • Patent Family Expansion Adds Value: Seek regional and international patents based on existing Slovenian filings to broaden protection.
  • Landscape Vigilance is Essential: Regularly monitor prior art and competing patent filings to avoid infringement and identify licensing opportunities.
  • Innovation Is Context-Dependent: Novel chemical structures, formulations, or methods that address unmet needs bolster patent defensibility.
  • Legal Strategy Must Align with Technical Scope: Clear understanding of claims and their interpretation supports effective patent enforcement and licensing.

FAQs

Q1: How does Slovenian patent SI2989106 compare with European or US counterparts?
SI2989106’s enforceability extends within Slovenia; its value expands through regional counterparts in the EPC or PCT system. If similar or related patents exist in Europe or the US, they can influence the scope and strength, often requiring strategic patent family management for comprehensive protection.

Q2: Can broad claims in SI2989106 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, broad claims are vulnerable to invalidation if prior art disclosures, such as earlier chemical patents or scientific publications, demonstrate obviousness or anticipation, emphasizing the importance of specific, well-supported claim language.

Q3: What are typical challenges faced in patenting pharmaceutical compounds in Slovenia?
Challenges include demonstrating novelty and inventive step against prior art, securing sufficiently broad claims, and ensuring detailed descriptions to support claims, especially given Slovenia’s examination standards aligned with EPC requirements.

Q4: How can companies leverage patent landscaping in the pharmaceutical sector?
They can identify patenting trends, assess competitive positioning, spot potential infringement risks, and uncover licensing or partnership opportunities, aiding strategic R&D and commercialization plans.

Q5: What future developments could influence the patent landscape of compounds like SI2989106?
Emerging therapies, molecular innovations, and regulatory changes may lead to new filings or opposition proceedings. Staying proactive in patent monitoring and evolving claim strategies remains critical for maintaining competitive advantage.


References

  1. European Patent Office. (2022). EPC Patent Examination Guidelines.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2022). Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Patent Search and Analysis.
  3. Slovenia Patent Office. (2022). National patent examination procedures and standards.
  4. Patent Documentation for SI2989106 (as available via Slovenia Patent Office or relevant database).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.