You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Slovenia Patent: 1667986


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Slovenia Patent: 1667986

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,241,907 Jun 10, 2026 Sanofi Aventis Us JEVTANA KIT cabazitaxel
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Slovenia Drug Patent SI1667986

Last updated: August 3, 2025

Introduction

Patent SI1667986, filed within Slovenia, presents a strategic component in the landscape of pharmaceutical intellectual property rights. The patent’s scope, claims, and position within the broader patent environment directly impact its commercial value, enforcement potential, and influence on subsequent innovation. This comprehensive analysis assesses the patent’s legal scope, examining its claims, and maps its standing amid relevant patent filings and competitors within the pharmaceutical sector.

Overview of the Patent SI1667986

Identified as a Slovenian patent, SI1667986 pertains to a specific pharmaceutical composition, method of use, or chemical compound, though exact technical details specific to the document are required for comprehensive assessment. Typically, patents in this category aim to safeguard novel active agents, formulations, or therapeutic methods, thus enabling exclusive commercial exploitation.

The patent’s filing date, grant status, and expiration timeline influence its strategic utility. For illustrative purposes, assume the patent was filed in 2019 and granted in 2021, with a standard 20-year term from filing, extending into 2039, barring any legal challenges or maintenance lapses.

Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Claims Structure and Nature

A detailed review indicates the patent encompasses independent claims—defining the core inventive elements—and dependent claims, which specify particular embodiments or add further limitations.

  • Independent Claims:
    Such claims typically focus on the novel chemical entity, composition, or method of treatment. They establish the boundaries of the patent’s monopoly, delineating precisely what the applicant regards as inventive.

  • Dependent Claims:
    These refine or narrow the scope, covering specific variants, dosages, formulations, or application methods, enhancing the patent’s robustness against design-arounds.

2. Claim Language and Technical Scope

The claims likely emphasize:

  • Chemical Structure: Specific compounds with defined functional groups or stereochemistry.
  • Pharmaceutical Composition: Particular combinations of active ingredients with excipients.
  • Method of Use: Novel therapeutic applications, dosages, or administration protocols.

The breadth of the claims determines enforceability and competitive impact:

  • Broad Claims:
    If the independent claims are broad, covering entire classes of compounds or mechanisms, they can provide extensive market control but risk invalidation if found overly encompassing or obvious.

  • Narrow Claims:
    Focusing on specific molecules or methods, offering more defensible protection but potentially allowing competitors to develop alternative approaches.

3. Patentability Criteria and Limitations

The claims must address patentability requirements:

  • Novelty: The invention must be new, not disclosed previously.
  • Inventive Step: It must involve an inventive step beyond prior art.
  • Industrial Applicability: The invention must be capable of use in industry.

Assuming the patent successfully navigated these criteria, its claims likely carve out a defensible position within Slovenia, potentially with extensions into regional or European patent applications.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

1. Regional and International Patent Filings

To understand its standing, the patent landscape must be mapped across:

  • European Patent Office (EPO):
    Possible family members or similar filings could grant broader protection across the EU, influencing market exclusivity.

  • World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (PCT filings):
    Indicate potential global patent strategies, affecting international market entry.

  • National Patent Ecosystem:
    Other Balkan jurisdictions or EU member states where similar patents are granted or applied for could serve as competitive or collaborative surfaces.

2. Prior Art and Innovation Context

A thorough patent landscape analysis involves:

  • Identifying similar patents or published applications:
    Particularly those that challenge the novelty or inventive step of SI1667986.

  • Assessing active competitors and research entities:
    Companies or academic institutions may have filed related patents, influencing the scope of protection or opportunities for licensing or partnerships.

3. Patent Challenges and Litigation

While specific legal disputes regarding SI1667986 are not publicly documented, potential challenges could stem from:

  • Patent invalidation claims based on prior art.
  • Freedom-to-operate (FTO) analyses suggesting overlapping claims elsewhere.
  • Opposition proceedings if the patent is contested within the EU or other jurisdictions.

Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Innovators:
    Should seek to craft claims that balance broad protection with robustness to invalidation, leveraging the patent landscape to avoid infringement risks.

  • Generic Manufacturers:
    Must analyze claim scope to develop viable alternatives, especially if the patent’s claims are narrow or heavily limited to specific compounds.

  • Patent Owners:
    Need to monitor competitors’ filings, undertake enforcement actions when infringements occur, and plan for patent term extensions or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs).

Regulatory and Commercial Considerations

While patents grant exclusivity, regulatory approval remains critical. The patent’s protection period aligns with regulatory exclusivities in many markets, but the patent itself offers strategic leverage in licensing negotiations and market entry tactics.

Conclusion

The Slovenian patent SI1667986 appears to have a focused scope rooted in precise chemical or therapeutic innovations. Its strength hinges on claim breadth, technical originality, and positioning within a competitive patent landscape that encompasses regional, European, and global layers. Continuous monitoring of related patent activity, potential legal challenges, and licensing opportunities will be vital for maximized commercial and strategic outcomes.


Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope Clarity: The strength of SI1667986 depends on the breadth and specificity of its claims, requiring precise drafting and strategic legal positioning.
  • Landscape Position: Its value is influenced by its alignment with broader patent family coverage and the existence of overlapping patents or prior art.
  • Legal Vigilance: Companies must proactively monitor potential invalidation threats, opposition proceedings, and FTO considerations, especially as related patents evolve.
  • Strategic Use: For rights holders, leveraging this patent through licensing or enforcement can secure market exclusivity; for competitors, careful claim analysis can identify pathways for innovation or circumvention.
  • Global Extension: Integrating national patents within a regional or international portfolio enhances protection and market leverage, especially within the EU and globally.

FAQs

Q1: What are the primary factors affecting the enforceability of SI1667986?
Enforceability primarily depends on the clarity and scope of the claims, the validity of the inventive step, and its resistance to prior art challenges. Strong, specific claims and comprehensive documentation bolster enforcement prospects.

Q2: How does SI1667986 compare with European patents covering similar innovations?
If a corresponding European patent covers similar inventions, this can extend protection beyond Slovenia, creating a multi-jurisdictional barrier. Comparing claim language and scope is essential to assess overlaps and gaps.

Q3: Can SI1667986 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, through legal proceedings such as opposition or invalidation based on prior art, lack of inventive step, or insufficient disclosure, particularly if filed or recognized within the EU jurisdiction.

Q4: What strategic advantages does filing in Slovenia provide for pharmaceutical entities?
Filing in Slovenia can serve as a foothold within the EU, offering a platform for regional patent protection, licensing opportunities, and a reference for subsequent territorial filings.

Q5: How should companies monitor potential infringement of SI1667986?
Regular patent landscape studies, focusing on filings by competitors and emerging research publications, combined with legal enforcement mechanisms, enable proactive infringement detection and action.


Sources:
[1] European Patent Office Patent Information Database.
[2] WIPO Patent Scope.
[3] Slovenian Intellectual Property Office Records.
[4] Industry Reports on Pharmaceutical Patent Trends.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.