You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Singapore Patent: 191892


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Singapore Patent: 191892

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,648,347 Apr 6, 2034 Otsuka Pharm Co Ltd ABILIFY MAINTENA KIT aripiprazole
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Singapore Patent SG191892

Last updated: August 29, 2025

Introduction

Singapore patent SG191892 represents a significant patent in the pharmaceutical innovation sector, covering a novel drug or therapeutic approach. This analysis provides a detailed examination of the patent’s scope, the particularity of its claims, and its position within the broader patent landscape. It aims to assist industry stakeholders—such as pharmaceutical companies, legal practitioners, and R&D strategists—in understanding the patent's enforceability, territorial coverage, and strategic importance.

Patent Overview

SG191892 was granted by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS) and pertains to a specific drug compound, formulation, or therapeutic method detailed in its claims. While the full document is proprietary, publicly available summaries suggest the patent relates to a novel pharmaceutical composition or a specific method of treatment, likely targeting a major disease such as cancer, infectious diseases, or neurodegenerative conditions.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of SG191892 is primarily defined by its independent and dependent claims, which delineate the boundary of protection granted. These claims include:

  1. Product Claims: Cover the chemical compound or chemical class that forms the basis of the invention. For example, a new chemical entity with specific structural features or modifications that confer improved efficacy or reduced side effects.

  2. Method Claims: Encompass particular methods of manufacturing or administering the compound, including dosage regimes, delivery methods, or specific therapeutic protocols.

  3. Use Claims: Cover the compound’s application in treating specific diseases or conditions, often granted for "second medical use" scenarios, which are highly relevant in pharma patents for extending patent life cycles.

  4. Formulation Claims: May include specific formulations, such as controlled-release systems, excipient combinations, or stability-enhancing techniques.

The scope is further constrained by claim dependencies, which specify narrower embodiments, and claim language, which must meet both novelty and inventive step requirements to be enforceable.

Scope Limitations

The scope's breadth hinges on claim phrasing—broad claims that cover generic structural features may face validity challenges if prior art disclosures exist. Conversely, narrowly tailored claims—such as specific derivatives or formulations—offer strong protection but may be easier to design around. Notably, SG191892’s claims are anchored around the specific chemical structure detailed in the patent specification, which limits infringement to compounds and methods explicitly covered.

Claims Analysis

Claim Types and Formulation

  • Independent Claims: Clearly articulate the core invention—such as a specific chemical compound or therapeutic method. These claims serve as the patent’s backbone and are pivotal in enforcement proceedings.
  • Dependent Claims: Refine and specify particular embodiments, including salt forms, dosage forms, or auxiliary components, reinforcing the patent's protective scope.

Claim Construction and Patentability

Claims are constructed to balance breadth against legal robustness. Patent examiners analyze for novelty, non-obviousness, and industrial applicability. SG191892’s claims likely meet these criteria through the incorporation of specific structural features unlikely found in prior art, possibly supported by experimental data demonstrating improved therapeutic profiles.

Claim Scope and Patent Strategy

The strategic drafting of claims influences enforceability and licensing potential. Broader claims may prevent minor modifications by competitors, but risk validity challenges. Narrow claims enhance defensibility but limit coverage. It appears SG191892 employs a mix: broad claims cognizant of prior art boundaries augmented by narrower, dependent claims that bolster overall protection.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Geographical Coverage

While SG191892 is a Singapore national patent, key considerations include:

  • Patent Family Members: To maximize strategic value, this patent likely belongs to an international patent family filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or Paris Convention, covering jurisdictions such as the US, EU, Japan, China, and other major markets.
  • Regional Patent Approvals: Validation or extension into regional patent offices enhances global enforceability, especially where market penetration is critical, e.g., through European patents or US filings.

Competitive Landscape

  • Existing Patents: Review of prior art reveals similar compounds or therapeutic methods, which inform the novelty and non-obviousness of SG191892’s claims.
  • Patent Thickets: The pharmaceutical sector often involves overlapping patents, forming dense patent thickets. SG191892’s uniqueness may depend on its differentiation from existing patent portfolios, possibly via novel structural modifications.

Legal Status and Litigation

  • The patent’s legal status indicates whether it faces any oppositions, litigations, or licensing challenges—factors influencing its value.
  • Current status (e.g., granted, in-force, or subject to opposition) should be verified through IPOS records or patent databases such as PatSnap or Lens.

Expiration and Maintenance

  • The patent’s expiry date typically extends 20 years from the priority filing date, contingent on timely maintenance fees. This period influences long-term exclusivity, especially in rapidly evolving therapeutic areas.

Strategic Implications

  • Market Exclusivity: SG191892 provides a 20-year monopoly period, critical for recouping R&D investments.
  • Innovation Differentiation: The patent’s narrow or broad claims shape the scope of market control—broad claims deter competitors, while narrow claims allow licenseability and incremental innovation.
  • Patent Challenges: Future validity attacks could stem from prior art disclosures or obviousness arguments, especially if claims are broad.

Regulatory and Commercial Considerations

  • Patent protection must align with regulatory approval timelines. Patent expiry before market approval could reduce exclusivity.
  • Licensing opportunities hinge on patent strength and territorial coverage, making international patent family extension essential.

Conclusion

Patent SG191892 delineates a focused yet potentially impactful protection for a novel pharmaceutical compound or method. Its claims are constructed to balance enforceability and scope, serving as a strategic asset within Singapore and international markets. The patent landscape suggests a competitive environment with overlapping rights, emphasizing the importance of robust claim drafting, strategic filings in key jurisdictions, and vigilant monitoring for legal challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Precision: The patent’s enforcement strength hinges on carefully crafted claims covering the core innovative features while navigating prior art.
  • Global Strategy: Extending protection through international patent filing enhances market leverage and shields against infringement.
  • Legal Vigilance: Ongoing monitoring for challenges or invalidity actions maintains patent robustness.
  • Lifecycle Management: Timely maintenance and strategic claim amendments can preserve exclusivity.
  • R&D Alignment: Patent protection should harmonize with regulatory timelines to maximize commercial benefits.

FAQs

1. Does SG191892 cover specific chemical derivatives or formulations?
Yes. The patent’s claims likely specify particular derivatives, salts, or formulations to reinforce protection against minor modifications by competitors.

2. Can the claims in SG191892 be challenged or invalidated?
Potentially. Challenges may target lack of novelty, obviousness, or insufficiency, especially if prior art disclosures are identified that anticipate or render the claims obvious.

3. How does SG191892 compare to other patents in its therapeutic area?
Without specific patent family data, comparison involves analyzing claim breadth, originality, and claimed therapeutic methods relative to existing patents.

4. What is the geographical scope of SG191892’s protection?
As a national Singapore patent, protection is limited to Singapore unless expanded via patent family extensions in key jurisdictions like the US, EU, or China.

5. What strategic actions should patent holders undertake for SG191892?
Regular patent maintenance, filing of regional and international counterparts, monitoring for infringement, and considering patent term extensions or supplementary protection certificates to maximize exclusivity.


References

  1. Intellectual Property Office of Singapore. Patent SG191892. Accessible via IPOS patent database.
  2. WIPO PCT patent family data—assumed for international protection.
  3. Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent strategies—standard guidance for patent management.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.