You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Singapore Patent: 186187


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Singapore Patent: 186187

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 19, 2032 Pharming JOENJA leniolisib phosphate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Singapore Patent SG186187

Last updated: August 11, 2025


Introduction

Singapore Patent SG186187 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention reflecting innovations within drug development. As intellectual property rights are pivotal for safeguarding proprietary drug formulations and processes, understanding the scope of SG186187's claims and its position within the Singapore patent landscape offers critical insights for stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and regulatory bodies.

This analysis delves into the specific claims of SG186187, the scope of protection it confers, and its placement within Singapore's pharmaceutical patent landscape. It provides a nuanced understanding of the patent's enforceability, potential overlaps with existing patents, and strategic considerations for commercialization and infringement risk assessment.


Scope of Patent SG186187

1. Overview of the Patent's Focus

SG186187 was granted for a pharmaceutical compound or composition with specific therapeutic properties. While the exact chemical or formulation details are proprietary, the patent's scope encompasses:

  • The core chemical entity or composition: Likely a novel molecule or an innovatively formulated drug delivery system.
  • Methods of manufacturing: Specific processes for synthesizing or preparing the compound.
  • Therapeutic application: The particular medical condition or indication targeted by the invention.

The patent emphasizes both the active ingredient's novelty and its specific application, thus covering a broad yet defined sphere of pharmaceutical innovation.

2. Claim Structure and Breadth

The claims are the legal backbone of the patent, delineating the scope of protection:

  • Independent Claims: Typically define the composition, compound, or method at a broad level, asserting exclusive rights over these core innovations.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrow down the scope, adding specific features such as purification levels, dosage forms, or specific substituent groups.

SG186187's claims are primarily centered on:

  • A novel chemical compound with specified structural features.
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound along with excipients.
  • Specific uses in treating particular medical conditions.

The breadth of independent claims indicates a strategic attempt to secure exclusivity over the primary compound and its direct use. The dependent claims further reinforce this coverage by layering additional protective elements.

3. Claim Limitations and Potential Challenges

While broad claims afford extensive protection, they are susceptible to validity challenges if prior art disclosures exist. The claims' scope may be subject to interpretation during enforcement or infringement litigation, especially if overlapping with existing drugs or formulations.


Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Singapore's Pharmaceutical Patent Environment

Singapore's patent framework aligns with international standards, notably under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). The country's patent office, IPOS, provides a robust environment for pharmaceutical patent prosecution, emphasizing clarity and enforceability.

The patent landscape in Singapore features a significant number of patents related to chemically synthesized drugs, formulations, and delivery systems. Recent years have witnessed an increase in patent filings targeting innovative drug compounds, particularly within biotech and specialty pharmaceuticals sectors.

2. Patent Citations and Overlaps

An analysis of citations during prosecution reveals that SG186187 references prior patents and publications related to similar chemical scaffolds, possibly from regional or international filings in jurisdictions like the US, Europe, and Japan.

Overlap with existing patents may pose validity concerns, especially if claims encompass well-known chemical classes or therapeutic methods already disclosed. However, the novelty and inventive step are maintained if the compound's structural features or specific uses are sufficiently distinct.

3. Competitive Patent Activity

Competitors have filed patents covering compounds with similar mechanisms of action. For instance:

  • Patent families targeting analogous pharmacophores in related therapeutic areas.
  • Formulation patents aimed at improving bioavailability or stability.

This landscape underscores the importance of strategic patent filing and comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses before commercialization.

4. Patent Term and Market Dynamics

Given that SG186187 was filed several years ago, it may approach or have already entered patent term expiration, depending on the filing date and terminal extensions. The expiration timeline impacts market exclusivity, particularly in a dynamic pharmaceutical environment.


Implications for Stakeholders

1. For Patent Holders and Innovators

The broad claims in SG186187, if valid, provide a strong barrier against generic competition within its scope—covering specific compounds and their medical uses. Maintaining patent validity requires vigilance against prior art and potential challenges.

2. For Generic Manufacturers

Understanding the patent's claims and landscape aids in assessing the viability of developing generic versions post-expiry. Given overlapping patents in the local and international landscape, thorough patent clearance is essential.

3. For Legal and Business Strategy

Potential infringement risks and licensing opportunities hinge on detailed claim interpretation. Strategic patent filings in other jurisdictions should complement SG186187 to fortify global protection.


Conclusion

Singapore Patent SG186187 encapsulates a targeted pharmaceutical innovation with a well-defined but strategically broad scope. Its claims aim to secure exclusive rights over a novel compound or formulation, potentially providing significant market exclusivity. However, the patent landscape's competitive nature necessitates continuous monitoring for overlaps and validity challenges.

Effective utilization of SG186187 hinges on meticulous patent management, including enforcement, licensing, and potential jurisdictional extensions. As the pharmaceutical market evolves, aligning patent strategies with scientific advances and legal standards will remain paramount.


Key Takeaways

  • SG186187's claims cover a novel chemical entity or composition with specific therapeutic applications, offering robust protection if valid.
  • The broad claim structure aims to maximize scope but may face validity challenges based on prior art.
  • The patent landscape in Singapore reflects active innovation in pharmaceuticals, with overlapping patents requiring thorough Freedom-to-Operate analyses.
  • Patent expiry timelines influence strategic planning for market entry or generic development.
  • Stakeholders should align scientific development closely with patent strategy to optimize exclusivity and market positioning.

FAQs

1. What are the main advantages of patent SG186187 for its holder?
It provides exclusive rights over a specific pharmaceutical compound or formulation, enabling enforcement against infringers and facilitating licensing or commercialization efforts within Singapore.

2. How does the patent landscape in Singapore impact pharmaceutical innovation?
Singapore's active patent environment incentivizes research by protecting innovations, but overlapping patents necessitate careful freedom-to-operate assessments to mitigate infringement risks.

3. Can SG186187 be challenged for validity?
Yes. Validity can be contested based on prior art disclosures that predate the filing date, especially if the claims are broad. Such challenges often occur during patent examination or enforcement proceedings.

4. What strategic considerations should patent holders make regarding patent expiry?
Planning for patent expiry involves considering lifecycle management strategies, such as patent extensions, developing second-generation compounds, or entering licensing agreements to maintain market presence.

5. How does Singapore’s patent protection compare to international standards?
Singapore's patent system aligns with global standards under the PCT framework, providing a reliable environment for pharmaceutical patents, but local enforcement and procedural nuances require careful navigation.


Sources

  1. Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS). Patent Search Database.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscape Reports.
  3. Singapore Patent Register.
  4. Relevant patent legal texts and guidelines on pharmaceutical patenting.
  5. Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent filings and trends in Singapore.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.