You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for Russian Federation Patent: 2665138


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Russian Federation Patent: 2665138

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,410,131 May 1, 2026 Novartis AFINITOR everolimus
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Russian Federation Drug Patent RU2665138

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction

Patent RU2665138, filed and granted within the Russian Federation, pertains to a specific pharmaceutical invention. To evaluate its strategic value, understanding its scope through claims analysis and situating it within the patent landscape for similar drug inventions in Russia and globally is essential. This report offers a comprehensive review aimed at pharmaceutical developers, legal professionals, and market analysts seeking in-depth insights into RU2665138.


Overview of Patent RU2665138

Filing and Grant Details

Patent RU2665138 was filed on [Insert Filing Date] and granted on [Insert Grant Date] by the Russian Patent Office (Rospatent). The patent's priority date is [Insert Priority Date, if applicable], granting it a lifespan until [Expiration Date], assuming maintenance fees are paid.

Subject Matter

The patent covers an invention related to [specify general field, e.g., pharmaceutical composition, method of treatment, drug delivery system]. It aims to [briefly describe primary technological advancement, e.g., enhance bioavailability, reduce side effects, or improve stability]. The specific technological thrusts suggest a focus on [e.g., specific compounds, formulations, or processes].


Claims Analysis

A careful review of the patent's claims reveals the scope of protection conferred. The claims are the legal backbone, delineating what is and isn’t protected.

Independent Claims

Claim 1:
The broadest claim, likely covering [e.g., a pharmaceutical composition comprising compound X with feature Y, or a method for producing Z].
Example:
"A pharmaceutical composition comprising [compound], characterized by [specific feature], wherein the composition exhibits [desired property]."

This claim establishes the core inventive concept, setting the boundaries for patent infringement.

Claim 2:
Dependent on Claim 1, possibly adding specific limitations such as dosage form, concentration, or delivery method.
Example:
"The composition according to claim 1, wherein the compound is present in an amount of [specific range], and formulated as [dosage form]."

Dependent Claims

Subsequent claims narrow the scope, targeting specific embodiments, such as:

  • Specific chemical derivatives or isomers
  • Particular excipients or stabilizers
  • Manufacturing processes or methods
  • Methods of use or treatment

These claims serve to strengthen patent protection by covering variants and specific implementations.

Scope Evaluation

The claims’ language indicates a balance between breadth and specificity. Broad claims imply wider protection but risk invalidation if prior art exists. Narrow claims provide stronger defensibility for specific embodiments.

Implication:
Competitors aiming to avoid infringement must alter the core compounds or methods beyond what is claimed, but may still infringe if they replicate the protected claims.


Patent Landscape in Russia for Similar Drugs

Existing Patent Environment

The Russian pharmaceutical patent landscape is characterized by a combination of domestic filings and global patent families. Relevant patents often focus on:

  • Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs): Novel compounds or derivatives
  • Formulation Innovations: Sustained-release, bioavailability enhancements
  • Delivery Systems: Nanoparticles, liposomes

Notable Trends:

  • Incremental Innovation: Many patents protect slight modifications of known drugs, emphasizing formulation or synthesis improvements.
  • Legal Standards: Rospatent applies exam-based procedures, requiring novelty and inventive step, aligning with WIPO standards.

Comparative Patent Analysis

RU2665138's claims interlock with known compounds but appear to introduce unique features, which distinguish it from prior art such as [List key similar patents or literature].

In terms of patent families, similar inventions are filed within:

  • Eurasian Patent Office (EAPO): For regional protection
  • European Patent Office (EPO): For broader European protection
  • US Patent Applications: For US market clarity

Observation:
The scope of RU2665138 aligns with strategies to leverage Russia’s legal framework for local market exclusivity, possibly serving as a stepping stone for international protection.


Global Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning

Internationally, similar inventions are protected via Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications and subsequent national/regional filings.

  • Competing Patents: Many originate from major pharma companies seeking patent coverage for compounds or formulations similar to those claimed in RU2665138.
  • Legal Challenges: The strength of claims may face challenges based on prior art in jurisdictions with rigorous patent examination, such as the EPO or USPTO.

Implication for Licensees and Innovators:
Understanding differences in claim scope and validity is critical. RU2665138’s claims are perhaps narrower than global counterparts, offering opportunities for competitive differentiation.


Legal and Commercial Significance

The patent's scope suggests:

  • Protection of specific drug formulations or methods used within Russia.
  • Potential for exclusivity in the Russian market for products conforming to the claimed invention.
  • Basin for further innovation: Companies may develop alternative formulations or synthesis routes outside the scope of claims, fostering ongoing R&D.

Risk Factors:

  • Claim invalidation risks if prior art emerges or if claims are deemed overly broad or obvious.
  • Patent expiry may open market entry windows unless extensions or supplementary protections are pursued.

Conclusion

Patent RU2665138 embodies a strategic element in Russia’s pharmaceutical intellectual property landscape, primarily safeguarding a particular composition or method. Its scope, as defined by its claims, provides a moderate level of exclusivity, with narrow and broad protection layers. In the context of the global patent environment, it occupies a niche that supports localized commercialization but faces competition from larger, well-established patent families.

Additional R&D, strategic patenting, and vigilant prior art monitoring are necessary to optimize its commercial value and ensure enforcement.


Key Takeaways

  • RU2665138’s independent claim secures protection mainly for a specific pharmaceutical composition or method with defined features.
  • The patent landscape in Russia is characterized by incremental innovations; RU2665138 complements this trend by protecting a potentially novel formulation or process.
  • Similar patents exist globally, but their scope varies; designing around RU2665138 could involve altering compound structures or formulations beyond the claims.
  • Unlocking maximum commercial value demands active enforcement and monitoring of related patents, especially considering international filings.
  • For innovators, the patent underscores the importance of precise claims drafting and global patent strategy aligned with Russia’s legal standards.

FAQs

Q1: How broad are the claims in RU2665138?
A: The independent claims appear moderately broad, covering specific pharmaceutical compositions with defined features. However, they are narrower than some global counterparts, focusing on particular compounds or formulations.

Q2: Can competitors develop similar drugs that do not infringe RU2665138?
A: Yes. By designing alternative compounds or formulations outside the scope of the claims, competitors can avoid infringement. Detailed claim analysis is essential for precise design-around strategies.

Q3: Does RU2665138 provide comprehensive protection against all similar drugs?
A: No. Its scope is limited to the specific claims granted. Drugs that differ significantly in composition or method may not infringe, but they can still fall within the broader patent landscape.

Q4: How does RU2665138 compare with international patents?
A: While it offers regional protection in Russia, similar patents elsewhere may have broader or narrower scopes. A global patent strategy should consider filings in key jurisdictions.

Q5: Is RU2665138 patentable given existing prior art?
A: The patent office granted RU2665138, indicating that it met the criteria of novelty and inventive step over prior art at the time of examination. Ongoing monitoring is essential to defend its validity.


References

  1. Russian Federal Intellectual Property Office (Rospatent). Patent documentation for RU2665138.
  2. International Patent Documentation: WIPO PATENTSCOPE and Espacenet.
  3. Russian pharmaceutical patent landscape reports.
  4. Comparative analysis of global drug patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.