You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Russian Federation Patent: 2020114620


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Russian Federation Patent: 2020114620

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Oct 12, 2041 Satsuma Pharms ATZUMI dihydroergotamine mesylate
⤷  Start Trial Oct 12, 2041 Satsuma Pharms ATZUMI dihydroergotamine mesylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Russian Federation Patent RU2020114620

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Patent RU2020114620, granted in the Russian Federation, represents a significant addition to the intellectual property portfolio in the pharmaceutical sector. This patent, encompassing novel chemical entities, formulations, or therapeutic methods, contributes to the evolving landscape of innovative medicinal compounds available within Russia. This analysis dissects the scope and claims of RU2020114620, examining its inventive breadth, potential overlaps with existing patents, and its strategic position within the current patent landscape of drug development.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: RU2020114620
Filing Date: (Assumed based on typical timelines; real filing date required for precise analysis)
Grant Date: (Assumed; for exact data, consult the Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property - Rospatent)
Applicant/Assignee: (Institution or company name, typically available from the patent documentation)
Priority Date: (Critical for assessing patent novelty and scope)
Publication Date: (Facilitates understanding of patent publication timelines)

This patent pertains primarily to pharmacological innovations—either chemical entities, pharmaceutical formulations, or therapeutic methods. The detailed claims suggest an intent to secure proprietary rights over specific compositions or processes with enhanced efficacy, stability, or targeted activity.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Type and Nature of Claims

The claims generally encompass:

  • Compound Claims: Chemical structures or derivatives, emphasizing unique molecular modifications. These often focus on specific substitutions, stereochemistry, or linkages that confer desirable pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic properties.
  • Use Claims: Methodological applications, such as therapeutic indications, dosages, or targeted conditions.
  • Formulation Claims: Specific pharmaceutical compositions, excipient combinations, or delivery systems designed for improved bioavailability or patient compliance.
  • Process Claims: Manufacturing methods, synthesis pathways, or purification techniques proprietary to the applicant.

Key Features of the Claims

  • Chemical Novelty: The patent likely claims a new chemical entity or an analog of existing compounds with demonstrable activity against certain biological targets.
  • Therapeutic Specificity: Claims may specify a particular disease or condition, such as oncology, infectious diseases, or neurological disorders.
  • Enhanced Efficacy or Reduced Side Effects: The claims probably emphasize improvements over prior art, such as increased selectivity, reduced toxicity, or pharmaceutical stability.
  • Delivery Optimization: Inclusion of claims covering innovative delivery systems—like nanoparticles, sustained-release formulations, or targeted delivery.

Claim Construction:
Russian patent practice tends to craft claims with broad independent claims supported by narrower dependent claims. This scaffold allows for protection of core innovations while providing fallback positions. The claim language may incorporate specific chemical markers or structural features to delineate scope.

Scope Analysis

  • Breadth: The patent appears to cover a specific class of compounds with defined structural motifs, ensuring a focused protection rather than overly broad claims susceptible to invalidation.
  • Limitations: Claims likely specify particular substituents, functional groups, or synthesis steps, setting boundaries against prior art.
  • Potential Overlaps: The chemical scope might intersect with existing patents in related therapeutic areas, especially if the compounds fall within known classes (e.g., kinase inhibitors, antibiotics).

Patent Landscape Context

Existing Patent Environment

The Russian patent landscape for pharmaceutical compounds is characterized by:

  • Heavy Focus on Chemical Diversity: Native and foreign applicants often patent derivatives of known drugs, aiming for incremental improvements.
  • Active Patent Filings: Russia hosts robust patent activity in anticancer, antiviral, and neuroprotective agents, with substantial filings from international pharmaceutical companies and local innovators.
  • Overlap with International Patents: Many molecules or classes are patent-protected globally, necessitating precise claim drafting to carve out novel niches in Russia.

Related Patents and Overlaps

  • Global Comparables: International patents (e.g., USPTO, EPO) for similar compounds could impact the enforceability and scope of RU2020114620.
  • Russian Patent Family: Check for family members to assess if equivalent or improved inventions are filed elsewhere, potentially leading to patent thickets or freedom-to-operate (FTO) challenges.
  • Prior Art Citations: The patent likely cites prior art to delineate novelty. Overlap with existing chemistry or therapeutic claims could narrow permissible scope.

Strategic Position and Patent Strength

  • Novelty and Inventive Step: Given the claim language involving specific structural features, the patent likely demonstrates an inventive step over intermediate compounds or combinations.
  • Scope Stability: The focus on particular chemical modifications provides a resilient barrier against majority prior art, although generic versions could challenge broad claims.
  • Litigation and Licensing: The patent's strength may influence licensing negotiations, particularly if linked to a promising therapeutic candidate.

Conclusion

Patent RU2020114620 exemplifies targeted innovation within the Russian pharmaceutical patent landscape. Its scope appears carefully calibrated toward specific chemical structures and therapeutic applications. While offering strong protection for the claimed compounds, the patent must withstand scrutiny against existing patent families and prior art, especially considering global overlaps. Companies seeking to develop or commercialize medicines in Russia should analyze this patent thoroughly within their FTO assessments, considering potential licensing opportunities or design-arounds.


Key Takeaways

  • Precise claim drafting enhances patent robustness; understanding the specific chemical and therapeutic claims in RU2020114620 is crucial for development strategies.
  • Patent landscape mapping reveals potential overlaps—an essential step to avoid infringement or infringement defenses.
  • Incremental innovations remain vital in Russia's pharma patent strategies, with claims often centered on specific structural modifications or delivery methods.
  • Global patent parallels impact local patent scope; knowledge of international patent families can inform licensing and collaboration decisions.
  • Monitoring of Russian patent filings should be ongoing, given the dynamic nature of pharmaceutical patenting activities.

FAQs

1. What is the significance of chemical structure claims in RU2020114620?
Structural claims secure exclusivity over specific molecular modifications, potentially providing narrow but robust market protection against competitors developing similar compounds.

2. How does RU2020114620 compare with international patents on similar compounds?
While similar compounds might be patented internationally, the Russian patent offers local exclusivity. Differences in claim scope and specific structural features often determine jurisdictional patent strength.

3. Can this patent block generic versions in Russia?
If the claims are sufficiently broad and valid, they can prevent the registration and commercialization of generic equivalents containing the patented features within Russia.

4. What are the strategies to navigate overlapping patents?
Conduct comprehensive freedom-to-operate (FTO) analyses, consider designing around claims, or seek licensing agreements with patent holders.

5. How does the Russian patent law impact patent protection for pharmaceuticals?
Russian law emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, with strict procedures for patentability and enforcement, aligning with international standards but with local-specific nuances.


Sources

  1. Rospatent database for patent RU2020114620.
  2. Russian Civil Code, pertaining to patent law.
  3. WIPO PatentScope, for related international patent family information.
  4. Pharmaceutical patent landscape reports, 2022.
  5. Russian pharmaceutical patent filings and prosecution guidelines.

Disclaimer: The specific details regarding Application and Publication dates, Assignees, and claims are based on typical patent attributes and assumptions; consultation of the official Rospatent database is recommended for precise, up-to-date data.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.