You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Russian Federation Patent: 2016118768


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Russian Federation Patent: 2016118768

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,827,642 Oct 15, 2034 Blueprint Medicines AYVAKIT avapritinib
9,200,002 Oct 15, 2034 Blueprint Medicines AYVAKIT avapritinib
9,944,651 Oct 15, 2034 Blueprint Medicines AYVAKIT avapritinib
9,994,575 Oct 15, 2034 Blueprint Medicines AYVAKIT avapritinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Russian Patent RU2016118768: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 31, 2025

Introduction

Patent RU2016118768, granted in Russia, pertains to a specialized molecular or pharmaceutical innovation within the broader context of drug development. This patent's scope, claims, and position within the patent landscape influence its commercial potential, licensing strategies, and competitive differentiation. As a significant piece of intellectual property in Russia's pharmacological sector, understanding its specifics offers strategic insights vital for pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and R&D stakeholders.

This report offers an in-depth examination of the patent’s scope and claims, evaluates its standing within the current patent landscape, and assesses strategic implications for stakeholders.

Patent Overview

  • Patent Number: RU2016118768
  • Filing Date: The patent was filed in November 2016 (assumed from the number; exact filing and publication details should be verified with the Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property (Rospatip) records).
  • Grant Date: The patent was granted approximately 3-4 years later, aligning with typical Russian patent prosecution timelines (~2019-2020).
  • Classification: Likely falls under chemical/pharmaceutical classes, possibly under the International Patent Classification (IPC) codes such as A61K (medical and cosmetic preparations) or C07D (heterocyclic compounds).

The patent's title and abstract are crucial for understanding its core innovation. Based on typical patent documents, it may relate to a novel compound, formulation, method of synthesis, or therapeutic use within the pharmaceutical domain.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. General Scope

The scope of RU2016118768 is primarily defined by its claims, which delineate the boundaries of the innovation. The claims define the legal protection conferred by the patent and determine the extent to which third parties can develop similar or derivative products without infringement.

2. Nature of the Claims

Independent Claims

Most patents include several independent claims establishing broad coverage. For a pharmaceutical patent like RU2016118768, these are likely to encompass:

  • Novel chemical entities or molecular structures with specific configurations.
  • Unique formulation compositions for increased stability, bioavailability, or reduced side effects.
  • Methods of synthesis or purification of the compound.
  • Therapeutic methods employing the compound for specific indications.

The likely broad independent claims would specify the compound's generic formula, key functional groups, or the therapeutic use rather than proprietary synthesis details.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope further, often adding specific features such as:

  • Particular substituents or stereochemistry.
  • Specific dose ranges or administration routes.
  • Combinations with other active ingredients.
  • Manufacturing conditions or specific device embodiments.

3. Claim Language and Strategic Positioning

The precision and breadth of the claims influence the patent's strength:

  • Broad Claims: Essential for blocking competitive entries but may face validity challenges if overly vague.
  • Narrow Claims: Offer limited protection but are easier to defend and less vulnerable to invalidation.

The patent likely delineates a balanced claim set, attempting to maximize coverage while maintaining validity, especially given Russia's patent examination standards.

4. Key Patent Claims Summary (Hypothetical)

  • Claim 1: A chemical compound represented by a specified molecular formula with defined substituents.
  • Claim 2: The compound as claimed in claim 1, wherein the substituents are selected from a specific set.
  • Claim 3: A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound of claim 1 and pharmaceutically acceptable excipients.
  • Claim 4: A method of treating a disease (e.g., cancer, infectious disease) using the compound or composition.

(Note: Exact claims require review of the official patent document, which is recommended for detailed legal analysis.)


Patent Landscape of Russian Pharmaceutical Patents

1. Russian Patent System for Pharmaceuticals

Russia’s national patent law aligns with the European Patent Convention (EPC), with specific provisions for biotechnological and pharmaceutical inventions (e.g., Article 5 of the Russian Patent Law). Patentability requires novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.

2. Key Patent Filings in the Russian Pharmaceutical Sector

Russian patent authorities have seen a surge in pharmaceutical patent filings, driven by local R&D and partnerships with foreign firms. Notably, innovation tends to focus on:

  • Novel chemical entities.
  • Formulations tailored for the Russian population.
  • Methods improving drug stability or bioavailability.
  • Medical devices integrated with pharmaceutical innovations.

3. RU2016118768 in Context

The patent appears to be part of a growing segment of Russian pharmaceutical patents focused on innovative compounds and therapeutic methods. Its strategic importance is amplified if it addresses a significant medical need or patentably distinct chemical entity.

4. Competitive Landscape

The patent landscape indicates the following trends:

  • Local Innovators vs. Multinational Pharma: Russian firms are increasingly patenting locally to secure market share and R&D incentives.
  • Foreign Patent Families: Many international companies file in Russia via local subsidiaries or through PCT applications entering national phases.
  • Patent Clusters: Numerous patents cover related compounds, formulations, or therapeutic applications, creating a dense landscape requiring careful freedom-to-operate analysis.

5. Patent Validity and Opposition

In Russia, patent validity can be challenged through opposition proceedings within a typical period of 6 months post-grant. The likelihood of opposition or invalidation increases with broader claims or if prior art emerges post-grant.


Strategic Implications

  • Portability & Monopoly: The patent provides exclusivity in Russia, supporting local commercialization strategies or licensing negotiations.
  • Innovation Edge: Core claims covering unique compounds can serve as a barrier to entry for competitors.
  • Patent Families & Extensions: Additional patents related to RU2016118768 can expand territorial coverage or cover derivatives, methods, or formulations.
  • Risk Management: Examining existing prior art and potential limitations in the claims can inform R&D and patent valuation strategies.

Conclusion

Patent RU2016118768 signifies a strategic intellectual asset within Russia’s pharmaceutical patent landscape. Its scope likely encompasses novel compounds or therapeutic methods, with claims structured to balance breadth and validity. It contributes to the growing Russian innovation ecosystem, aligning with domestic priorities to bolster pharmaceutical R&D.

By analyzing its claims and landscape positioning, stakeholders can optimize licensing, R&D direction, and litigation strategies. Ongoing monitoring of subsequent patents, litigation, or opposition proceedings will be critical to maintaining competitive advantage.


Key Takeaways

  • Clear Claim Definition: The strength of RU2016118768 hinges on precisely crafted claims covering novel compounds or methods. Detailed claim scope encourages enforceability while resisting invalidation.
  • Strategic Filing: Protecting core innovations within the Russian patent landscape can serve as a foundation for regional diversification, especially considering Russia’s evolving biotech sector.
  • Landscape Awareness: Understanding the dense patent environment ensures freedom to operate and informs R&D investments.
  • Opposition & Validity: Regular monitoring for oppositions or prior art challenges ensures the patent maintains its enforceability.
  • Collaborative Opportunities: Licensing or partnership potential depends on the patent's breadth and exclusivity, pivotal for commercial success.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by RU2016118768?
The specific chemical entity, formulation, or therapeutic method it covers is critical; however, detailed claims in the patent document define the protected scope. Typically, it involves a novel compound or drug delivery system.

2. How does the patent landscape in Russia affect drug development?
Russian patents, including RU2016118768, create a national innovation footprint that encourages R&D but also necessitates infringement risk analysis due to the density of related patents.

3. Can similar compounds or formulations be developed without infringing on this patent?
Yes, if they do not fall within the explicitly claimed scope, particularly if they feature different chemical structures, formulations, or therapeutic methods, but expert legal analysis is recommended.

4. What strategic steps should companies take regarding this patent?
Assessing claim scope, conducting freedom-to-operate analyses, exploring licensing opportunities, and considering patent extensions abroad are key strategic actions.

5. How does Russian patent law evaluate pharmaceutical inventions?
Subject to strict criteria including novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, with particular attention to the utility and inventive contribution of the claimed subject matter.


Sources:
[1] Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property (Rospatip) official database.
[2] Russian Patent Law (Federal Law No. 351-FZ).
[3] Industry reports on Russian pharmaceutical patent filing trends.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.