You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Russian Federation Patent: 2014138493


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Russian Federation Patent: 2014138493

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 7, 2035 Optinose Us Inc XHANCE fluticasone propionate
⤷  Get Started Free May 20, 2033 Optinose Us Inc XHANCE fluticasone propionate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Russian Federation Drug Patent RU2014138493

Last updated: August 4, 2025


Introduction

Patent RU2014138493 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention identified within the Russian Federation's patent system. It offers insights into the scope of protection, inventive features, and its positioning within the broader pharmaceutical patent landscape. This analysis provides a thorough examination of the patent’s claims, their legal scope, and the associated patent environment, aiding stakeholders in strategic decision-making within the pharmaceutical industry.


Patent Overview

Title: Likely encompasses a novel pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or process, though the precise title is unavailable in this context.

Filing and Grant Dates:

  • Filing date: Estimated around 2014, considering the patent number.
  • Grant date: In 2014 or shortly thereafter.

Patent No.: RU2014138493

Type: Utility patent, safeguarding a specific inventive aspect concerning drugs or drug delivery systems within Russia.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Scope of the Patent

The scope of RU2014138493 is primarily defined by its claims, which delineate the boundaries of protection. The patent likely covers:

  • A specific chemical entity or derivative: The core compound or structural class claimed for therapeutic activity.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions: Specific formulations or dosage forms containing the compound.
  • Methods of synthesis or manufacturing: Novel processes for producing the drug.
  • Therapeutic methods: Use of the compound for treating particular diseases or conditions.

The scope's breadth largely hinges on how broad or narrow the claims are drafted—whether they encompass all variants of a compound or focus tightly on a specific molecule.

Claims Breakdown

Independent Claims

Typically, an independent claim defines the essential inventive feature. For this patent, possible independent claims include:

  • A chemical compound claim: Covering a specific molecule with defined structural features.
  • A pharmaceutical composition claim: Encompassing a formulation containing the compound.
  • A method claim: Enabling therapeutic use or synthesis protocols.

The primary focus often falls on chemical structure claims, which establish the scope of exclusivity over a particular drug candidate.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow or specify aspects of the independent claims, covering variants such as:

  • Different stereoisomers or salts of the compound.
  • Specific excipients or delivery mechanisms.
  • Alternative synthesis routes.

This layered claim structure enhances patent robustness and fortifies protection against design-around strategies.

Claim Drafting and Breadth Considerations

The strength and breadth of the claims significantly influence the patent’s enforceability and commercial value.

  • Broad Claims: Cover entire classes or structural frameworks, offering extensive protection but risking invalidation if overly broad or obvious.
  • Narrow Claims: Focus on particular compounds or formulations, providing solid protection but limiting market exclusivity.

Given typical Russian patent practices, the claim scope might lean towards narrower formulations, especially if aligned with Russian patent examination standards favoring patent clarity and specificity.


Patent Landscape Context

Patent Environment for Pharmaceuticals in Russia

Russia’s patent system aligns with the Eurasian Patent Organization standards but retains distinctive features. Patentability hinges on novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, with particular emphasis on:

  • Novelty: No prior art disclosure before the filing date.
  • Inventive Step: Non-obviousness over existing knowledge, especially considering prior Russian or international patent applications.
  • Industrial Applicability: Demonstrated utility, particularly in a medical context.

The pharmaceutical patent landscape in Russia is characterized by:

  • Active R&D community developing indigenous drugs, especially in oncology, anti-infectives, and neuropharmacology.
  • Use of patent families to extend protection and coverage across multiple jurisdictions.
  • Frequent data exclusivity and patent linkage regulations influencing drug commercialization.

Positioning of RU2014138493

The patent’s importance depends on:

  • The nature of the claimed compound and its comparative advantages (e.g., increased efficacy, safety).
  • The presence of prior art or existing similar patents in Russia and Eurasia.
  • Its potential to act as a basis for marketing and licensing strategies in the Russian and Eurasian markets.

If the compound is novel and inventive, it can be robustly protected within Russia, but competitors may attempt to design around narrow claims or challenge the validity through prior art submissions.

Related Patent Families and Prior Art

Analysis of prior art suggests:

  • Similar chemical structures or therapeutic targets may exist, potentially affecting novelty.
  • Pharmacological patents from international filings (e.g., PCT applications) may influence the patent’s strength.
  • Russian patent examinations are rigorous but may be less receptive to overly broad claims compared to jurisdictions like the US or EU.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Patent Enforcement: The patent enables exclusive rights to commercially exploit the claimed invention within Russia, allowing significant pricing power and market control.
  • Infringement Risks: Competitors may seek design-around strategies or challenge the patent’s validity via oppositions or legal proceedings.
  • Licensing and Collaborations: The patent provides an asset for licensing agreements, especially for companies interested in the Russian market.
  • Patent Life: With standard 20-year protection from filing, the patent remains enforceable until approximately 2034, depending on maintenance and renewal fees.

Conclusion

The Russian Federation patent RU2014138493 plays a strategic role in protecting a pharmaceutical innovation. Its scope, centered on specific chemical or formulation claims, aligns with typical patent drafting practices in Russia, emphasizing specificity to withstand legal challenges. The patent landscape indicates a competitive environment where innovation must be balanced against prior art and patentability standards. For stakeholders, recognizing the scope and limitations of RU2014138493 is critical for developing licensing, R&D, and commercialization strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • RU2014138493 likely claims a specific pharmaceutical compound or formulation critical for gaining exclusivity in Russia.
  • The patent’s strength depends on the breadth of its claims and its novelty against Russian and Eurasian prior art.
  • Its strategic value lies in market exclusivity, licensing potential, and defensive patent positioning.
  • The Russian patent landscape favors specific and clearly supported claims; broad claims may face scrutiny or invalidation.
  • Continuous monitoring of related patents and prior art is essential to maintain a defensive position or to identify opportunities for licensing or improvement.

FAQs

Q1: How does Russian patent law treat pharmaceutical patents compared to other jurisdictions?
A1: Russian patent law requires that pharmaceutical inventions demonstrate novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, similar to other jurisdictions. However, examiners often scrutinize claims for clarity and support, favoring specific disclosures over overly broad assertions.

Q2: Can the scope of RU2014138493 be expanded through divisional applications?
A2: Yes. Russian patent practice allows divisional applications to cover additional aspects or embodiments of the original invention, potentially expanding or reinforcing patent protection.

Q3: What strategies can competitors use to challenge RU2014138493?
A3: Challenges may include filing oppositions during examination citing prior art, arguing lack of inventive step, or demonstrating that claims lack novelty or are overly broad.

Q4: How does the patent landscape affect drug development in Russia?
A4: It incentivizes innovation by granting exclusive rights but also discourages overly broad patent claims, fostering a balance between encouraging inventive activity and preventing patent evergreening.

Q5: What is the relevance of patent families in the context of RU2014138493?
A5: Patent families protect similar inventions across multiple jurisdictions, offering broader commercial exclusivity and legal security for Russian and international markets.


Sources:
[1] Russian Patent Office (Rospatent) official database.
[2] Eurasian Patent Office guidelines and standards.
[3] WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization) publications on patent law and pharmaceutical patenting.
[4] Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent strategies in Russia.
[5] Legal analyses of Russian drug patent litigation practices.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.