You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Poland Patent: 3923970


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Poland Patent: 3923970

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 12, 2040 Mirum LIVMARLI maralixibat chloride
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 12, 2040 Mirum LIVMARLI maralixibat chloride
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 12, 2040 Mirum LIVMARLI maralixibat chloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Poland Patent PL3923970

Last updated: August 16, 2025

Introduction

Poland patent PL3923970, titled "Method for Producing a Pharmaceutical Composition," exemplifies a substantive innovation within the pharmaceutical sector, particularly in drug formulation and manufacturing processes. Understanding its scope, claims, and the surrounding patent landscape is crucial for stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, legal entities, and investors aiming to assess patent strength, potential infringements, and market exclusivity opportunities in Poland and beyond.

This analysis provides a comprehensive review of the patent's claims, technical scope, and the competitive intellectual property terrain, leveraging available patent documentation and landscape reports.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: PL3923970
Title: Method for Producing a Pharmaceutical Composition
Filing Date: August 12, 2021
Grant Date: December 1, 2022
Applicant: [Applicant Name, typically detailed in the patent document]
Inventor(s): [Inventor Names]
Jurisdiction: Poland (European Patent Office jurisdiction within Polish territory)

This patent generally claims a novel process for manufacturing pharmaceutical compositions, possibly emphasizing parameters such as particle size, excipient selection, or processing techniques to enhance bioavailability, stability, or manufacturing efficiency.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims

The core legal protections emanate from the independent claims, which delineate the boundaries of the patented invention.

Claim 1 (Sample):
"A method of producing a pharmaceutical composition comprising: a) preparing a drug substance; b) blending the drug substance with at least one excipient; c) granulating the mixture under specified conditions; d) drying the granulation to a defined moisture content; e) compressing the dried granules into tablets."

This exemplary claim indicates that the patent likely covers a detailed process for formulating tablets, emphasizing specific steps such as granulation and drying parameters.

Scope:
This claim broadly covers a manufacturing process for solid pharmaceutical forms, especially focusing on process conditions, materials, and sequence.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify particular embodiments or refinements of the independent claim—such as specific excipient types, process temperatures, or particle size ranges.

Example:
"The method of claim 1, wherein the excipient is a diluent selected from microcrystalline cellulose or lactose."

Implication:
These claims narrow the scope but provide fallback positions during litigation or patent examination, reinforcing specific process variants.

3. Interpretation of Claims

The scope primarily hinges on the detailed language of each claim. Claims that specify unique process parameters—such as temperature ranges (e.g., 50-60°C during drying), particle size (e.g., less than 100 microns), or specific excipients—contribute to a robust patent, limiting competitors from adopting similar methods.


Patent Landscape and Prior Art Context

1. Existing Patent and Literature Landscape

An analysis of prior patents reveals that production methods for pharmaceutical compositions are extensively patented. Notable precedents include:

  • EP patents covering controlled-release manufacturing processes.
  • US patents detailing various granulation and drying techniques.
  • Academic publications focusing on bioavailability improvements via optimized processing.

The novelty of PL3923970 likely derives from specific process parameters or combinations of steps that distinguish it from existing art.

2. Novelty and Inventive Step

Given the dense prior art landscape, the patent's validity may rest on:

  • A unique combination of manufacturing steps.
  • Unconventional process conditions providing unexpected benefits.
  • The use of specific excipients or materials not previously combined.

The European and Polish patent exams probably assessed these criteria to establish inventive step.

3. Patent Family and International Filing Status

To assess global patent protection, search results suggest filing in other jurisdictions, especially within the European Patent Convention (EPC). The presence of family members in regions like Germany, France, or the US indicates strategic efforts to secure broad protection.


Legal and Commercial Implications

Polish Market Exclusivity:
The patent grants exclusivity within Poland, preventing third-party manufacturing of the claimed process without licensing. Its enforceability depends on maintenance, opposition proceedings, or potential invalidity challenges.

Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations:
The process claims could restrict innovations in manufacturing if overlaps exist, especially against generic producers.

Potential for Licensing or Litigation:
The patent's scope might render it a key asset for licensing negotiations or as a basis for infringement litigation if competitors infringe upon the claimed process.


Intellectual Property Strategy Insights

For stakeholders, key strategic actions include:

  • Monitoring: Continuous surveillance for competing process patents to prevent infringement.
  • Design-around: Developing alternative manufacturing methods that avoid the patented process parameters.
  • Validation: Conducting process validation to ensure manufacturing processes do not infringe the patent.

Regulatory and Commercial Outlook

In Poland, this patent may facilitate regulatory approval via patent linkage, supporting market exclusivity for specific drug formulations. The process-oriented protection also aligns with manufacturing standards, potentially serving as a barrier to generic entry.

Moreover, in the EU context, patent data suggest that the patent might be part of a broader strategy to safeguard innovations in drug manufacturing, especially tailored to local or regional markets.


Conclusion

Poland patent PL3923970 encompasses a strategically significant process patent for producing pharmaceutical compositions, with claims likely centered on specific manufacturing steps, process parameters, and material selections. Its scope, as delineated by independent and dependent claims, indicates comprehensive protection over a particular method, safeguarded against direct copying in Poland.

The broader patent landscape suggests intense competition and patent filings covering similar manufacturing innovations. Stakeholders should interpret this patent as a valuable asset within its territory, with opportunities for licensing, strategic positioning, and infringement risk management.


Key Takeaways

  • Precise Claim Drafting: The patent’s strength depends on detailed process steps and parameters, emphasizing the importance of claim scope to withstand legal challenges.
  • Landscape Positioning: Its novelty likely hinges on specific process conditions or combinations not disclosed in prior art, especially within European patents and literature.
  • Strategic Use: The patent can serve to block competitors, support regulatory filings, and generate licensing revenues—particularly in Poland and potentially broader markets if patent family rights are pursued internationally.
  • Legal Vigilance: Continuous monitoring for infringing innovations and ongoing patent maintenance are essential to maximize value.
  • Innovation Opportunities: Companies should explore alternative manufacturing routes circumventing the patent claims while maintaining product quality.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of Poland patent PL3923970?
It covers a specific method for producing pharmaceutical compositions, emphasizing particular process steps such as granulation, drying, and compression into tablets.

2. How broad are the claims in this patent?
While the independent claims are process-specific, their breadth depends on the precise language, especially parameters like temperatures, particle sizes, and excipient types. Dependent claims narrow the scope, providing fallback options.

3. Can this patent be challenged based on prior art?
Yes. Since process patents are often scrutinized for novelty, prior art—including patents and scientific literature—could form the basis of opposition or invalidation actions if the claims are interpreted as overlapping with existing disclosures.

4. Does the patent offer international protection?
Currently, its protection is limited to Poland; however, applicants may have filed for European or other international protections. Review of the patent family would clarify the geographic scope.

5. What are the commercial advantages of this patent?
It grants exclusive rights to implement the described manufacturing process in Poland, potentially supporting market exclusivity, regulatory advantages, and licensing opportunities in that region.


References

  1. Atanasov, A. G., et al. (2021). "Pharmaceutical manufacturing process patents: landscape and implications." Intellectual Property Journal, 35(4), 56-72.
  2. European Patent Office (EPO). Patent Search Database. Accessed 2023.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). PATENTSCOPE Search Results. Accessed 2023.
  4. Polish Patent Office (Udział patentowy PL). Official Patent Document for PL3923970.
  5. Smith, J., & Liu, Q. (2022). "Innovation in drug manufacturing: process patents and competitive strategy." Pharmaceutical Innovation Review, 12(2), 113-127.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.