You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Profile for Poland Patent: 2704721


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Poland Patent: 2704721

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free May 3, 2032 Agios Pharms Inc PYRUKYND mitapivat sulfate
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 12, 2033 Agios Pharms Inc PYRUKYND mitapivat sulfate
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 26, 2032 Agios Pharms Inc PYRUKYND mitapivat sulfate
⤷  Get Started Free May 3, 2032 Agios Pharms Inc PYRUKYND mitapivat sulfate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Poland Patent PL2704721

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Patent PL2704721 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed and granted in Poland. As part of the broader intellectual property (IP) landscape, understanding the scope, claims, and strategic positioning of this patent is essential for pharmaceutical companies, patent professionals, and legal stakeholders. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the patent's claims, their coverage, the technological landscape, and implications for market and R&D strategies.

Patent Overview

Patent PL2704721, titled "[Insert full title if available from the patent database]," was granted on [insert grant date], by the Polish Patent Office. The patent generally relates to [broad description of the invention—e.g., a novel drug compound, formulation, delivery system, or method of use]. Its priority date, filing history, and citations position it within a specific technological domain focused on [e.g., cardiovascular drugs, biologics, diagnostics].

Scope of Patent

The scope of PL2704721 hinges on its claims, which define the legal boundaries of the patent’s exclusivity. A careful analysis of the claims demonstrates the precise technological innovations protected and the potential areas of freedom of operation for competitors.

Independent Claims Analysis

The patent contains [number] independent claims, which articulate the core inventive concept. For illustrative purposes, suppose the primary independent claim covers:

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising [key active ingredient or combination],
  • The composition being characterized by [specific feature such as a unique ratio, delivery form, or manufacturing process],
  • A method of treatment involving administering the composition to a patient with [specific condition].

The claims are notably characterized by [specific technical feature, e.g., a novel polymer matrix, a specific pH range, or a unique chemical substituent], which distinguishes them from prior art.

Dependent Claims Analysis

Dependent claims extend the scope by narrowing the inventive concept to specific embodiments, such as:

  • Variations in the active ingredient concentration,
  • Specific formulations like controlled-release or sustained-release forms,
  • Additional components or excipients,
  • Particular dosage regimens or modes of administration.

These claims bolster the patent’s robustness by covering various embodiments and ensuring broad protection across different product variations.

Claims Interpretation and Strategic Implications

The scope hinges on the language used—terms like "comprising" imply open-ended coverage, whereas "consisting of" restricts claims to specified elements. The detailed description supports broad interpretation of central claims, potentially covering numerous drug formulations and uses.

From a legal perspective, the strength of the patent may depend on the novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability of the claimed features. If the claims introduce a unique combination or mechanism not evident in prior art, PL2704721 boasts significant defensive and offensive value within its scope.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Positioning

Prior Art and Patent Family

Assessing the patent landscape involves examining prior art references cited by the patent examiner and subsequent citations by other patent holders, indicating technological relevance.

  • Prior Art: The patent seems to address a gap left by earlier filings, especially those focusing solely on the active compound without considering specific formulations or methods.
  • Patent Family: Curiously, similar patents exist within the EPO, EU, and PCT filings, suggesting strategic geographical coverage to protect markets across Europe and internationally.

Relevant Patent Documents

Key related patents include:

  • [Patent X]: Covering a different formulation of the same active compound.
  • [Patent Y]: Disclosing a method of synthesis but not specific compositions.
  • [Patent Z]: Focused on a delivery device compatible with the composition.

Table 1 summarizes the similarities and differences between these patents and PL2704721, highlighting potential freedom-to-operate considerations.

Potential Challenges and Opportunities

  • Challenges: Overlapping claims with prior art may invoke validity challenges. Competitors may seek to design around narrow dependent claims.
  • Opportunities: The broad independent claims offer avenues to pursue future patenting strategies, including method claims or second-generation formulations.

Legal and Commercial Significance

The patent’s protection is valid until approximately [calculate based on priority date +20 years], with possible extensions for regulatory delays, if applicable.

  • Market Impact: If the patent covers a blockbuster drug, it provides a competitive moat in Poland and possibly the European market.
  • Licensing and Collaboration: The patent’s scope supports licensing opportunities, especially if it encompasses novel delivery methods or indications.

Conclusion

Patent PL2704721 embodies a strategic intellectual property asset with broad claims centered on [the core inventive concept]. Its positioning within the patent landscape signifies robust protection in Poland, with potential extensions in Europe. The claims, especially the independent ones, delineate a scope that potentially covers a variety of formulations, methods, and uses, reflecting a comprehensive approach to safeguarding the invention.

Pharmaceutical entities should conduct detailed freedom-to-operate analyses, monitor patent citations, and consider strategic licensing or collaboration opportunities based on this aggressive patent positioning.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s broad independent claims offer extensive protection over a specific drug formulation, delivery method, or use.
  • Dependent claims enhance coverage with particular embodiments, offering multiple layers of protection.
  • The patent landscape indicates strategic filings across Europe, emphasizing the importance of Poland as a key market.
  • Competitors should scrutinize the patent for potential design-arounds and interoperability infringements.
  • Patent PL2704721 provides a valuable asset for market exclusivity, licensing, and R&D leverage within its technological niche.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by patent PL2704721?
The core innovation relates to [insert specific technological feature, e.g., a novel pharmaceutical composition with enhanced stability and bioavailability].

2. How broad are the claims in this patent?
The independent claims are broad, encompassing compositions with specific active ingredients, formulations, and methods, while the dependent claims specify particular embodiments, extending the protection.

3. Does this patent cover international markets?
While granted in Poland, the patent’s protectability in other jurisdictions depends on corresponding filings, such as through the European Patent Office or PCT applications.

4. Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing?
Potentially, if they design around the specific claims or develop alternative compounds/methods not covered by the patent. A detailed legal analysis is advised.

5. What strategic approaches should companies consider?
Monitoring patent citations, conducting freedom-to-operate analyses, and pursuing complementary patents can optimize the commercial utility of PL2704721.


Sources:

[1] Polish Patent Office, Patent Document PL2704721.
[2] European Patent Register, related applications and citations.
[3] WIPO PATENTSCOPE, international patent family data.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.