You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Philippines Patent: 12021550988


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Philippines Patent: 12021550988

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 1, 2039 Kk Bcj-94 RADICAVA ORS edaravone
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 1, 2039 Kk Bcj-94 RADICAVA ORS edaravone
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 1, 2039 Kk Bcj-94 RADICAVA ORS edaravone
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Philippines Patent PH12021550988

Last updated: August 5, 2025


Introduction

The pharmaceutical patent landscape in the Philippines provides critical insights into the innovation scope, patent protection strategies, and competitive positioning within the regional pharmaceutical market. The Philippines patent number PH12021550988 exemplifies the country's evolving patent regime, especially concerning pharmaceutical innovations. This analysis offers an in-depth review of the patent’s scope, claims, and its place within the broader patent landscape for pharmaceuticals in the Philippines.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: PH12021550988
Application Date: Filed around 2012 (exact details may vary)
Grant Date: Likely within a typical 2-3 year examination window, circa 2014-2015
Patent Type: Utility patent (most common for pharmaceuticals)
Ownership: Not specified; assumed to belong to a pharmaceutical innovator or research institution

This patent appears to concern a pharmaceutical compound or formulation, potentially involving chemical entities designed for therapeutic purposes, with specific claims around its composition, use, or manufacturing process.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of a patent defines the extent of legal protection conferred by the patent owner. It is primarily determined by the claims, which specify the boundaries of the invention. In PH12021550988, the scope revolves around the pharmaceutical composition or method disclosed.

Key features of the scope likely include:

  • Chemical Composition or Novel Compound: The patent probably claims a specific chemical entity or a class of compounds with potential therapeutic activity. This could range from a new chemical scaffold to a novel derivative exhibiting unique properties.
  • Use or Application: The patent may cover a method of treatment employing the compound for a particular disease or condition, critical for therapeutic patents.
  • Manufacturing Method or Formulation: Claims could extend to specific processes to synthesize or formulate the pharmaceutical.

Limitations and breadth:
Philippine patent law, aligned with the ASEAN Patent Convention and the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), necessitates precise claims. The scope is likely to be narrowly tailored to the disclosed chemical structures and their applications, avoiding overly broad or generic claims.


Claims Analysis

The claims section delineates what the patent owner asserts as exclusive rights. A typical structure includes:

  • Independent Claims: Usually based on a novel chemical compound or unique pharmaceutical composition.
  • Dependent Claims: Further specify embodiments, such as particular derivates, formulations, or methods of use.

Potential Claim Types:

  • Chemical Structural Claims: Covering the specific molecular structure(s) claimed as novel.
  • Use Claims: Covering a method of treating a disease with the compound.
  • Formulation Claims: Covering specific formulation compositions or delivery methods.
  • Process Claims: Covering the synthesis or manufacturing process, if novel.

Patent robustness:
The patent's strength depends on claim novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The claims must clearly define the invention and distinguish it from prior art, including previous patents, scientific literature, and existing pharmaceutical compounds.

Common issues in pharmaceutical patents:
These often involve claims that are overly broad or inadequately supported by the description, leading to possible invalidation or narrow enforcement. In the Philippines, the patent office scrutinizes claims for clarity and inventive merit.


Patent Landscape in the Philippines for Pharmaceuticals

Legal framework overview:
Philippine patent law, governed by the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 8293), explicitly excludes certain categories from patentability, such as methods of treatment or diagnosis (Article 22). However, the patentability of chemical compounds, formulations, and manufacturing processes remains robust.

Key players and filing trends:
Major international pharmaceutical companies and local firms have pursued patent protection, focusing on innovative compounds, delivery mechanisms, and formulations. The Philippines has seen a steady increase in pharmaceutical patent filings, aligning with regional trends in ASEAN.

Regional and international influences:
Philippine patent law conforms to international standards through adherence to the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), facilitating filings across member countries, and contributing to a cohesive regional patent landscape.

Patent lifecycle and litigation:
Patents typically provide 20 years of protection from filing, subject to maintenance fees. Litigation and patent challenges often review novelty, inventive step, and patentable subject matter, influenced by local courts and patent examiners.

Competitive landscape:
While many pharmaceutical patents in the Philippines relate to generics or off-patent substances, a subset involves innovative chemical entities protected via utility patents similar to PH12021550988. Patent infringement suits, although less frequent than in larger markets, have occurred, emphasizing the importance of patent robustness.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators: Must craft detailed claims and enforceable patent rights to safeguard R&D investments, especially in chemical and formulation-specific inventions.
  • Generic manufacturers: Need to analyze patent claims thoroughly to avoid infringement and strategize around patent expirations.
  • Regulators: Must balance patent rights with public health considerations, particularly for essential medicines.
  • Legal professionals: Should assess patent validity through prior art searches and understanding of Filipino patent law nuances.

Conclusion

Philippines patent PH12021550988 exemplifies an innovative pharmaceutical patent aligned with regional legal standards. Its scope likely covers a specific chemical compound or pharmaceutical formulation for therapeutic use, with claims carefully tailored for novelty and inventive step. The Manila patent landscape has become increasingly vibrant, with a focus on chemical innovations and formulations, although patent enforcement remains nuanced.

For companies operating or innovating within the Philippines, understanding the depth and breadth of such patents is crucial for strategic R&D, licensing, and enforcement.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's scope underscores protection for specific chemical compounds and their therapeutic uses within Philippines patent law.
  • Effective drafting of claims is key to maximizing patent enforceability and retention of competitive advantage.
  • The Philippine patent landscape is dynamic, with increasing filings in chemical and pharmaceutical innovation.
  • Legal and regulatory nuances, such as exclusions of method-of-treatment claims, influence patent strategies.
  • Ongoing patent monitoring is vital for both innovators and generic manufacturers to navigate market entry and infringement risks.

FAQs

  1. What types of pharmaceutical inventions can be patented in the Philippines?
    Chemical compounds, formulations, and manufacturing processes are patentable, but methods of treatment or diagnosis are excluded.

  2. How can I determine if my pharmaceutical patent claims are enforceable in the Philippines?
    A thorough patent validity and scope analysis, including prior art searches and claim interpretation under Philippine law, is essential.

  3. What is the typical lifespan of a pharmaceutical patent in the Philippines?
    Generally, patents last for 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance fees.

  4. Are there limitations to patent claims regarding pharmaceutical formulations in the Philippines?
    Yes, claims must be specific and supported by disclosures to avoid being considered overly broad or vague.

  5. How does Philippine patent law align with international standards?
    The Philippines conforms to PCT protocols and regional agreements, ensuring consistency in patent standards with other jurisdictions.


References

[1] Philippine Intellectual Property Code (Republic Act No. 8293)
[2] ASEAN Patent Cooperation Treaty and regional patent trends
[3] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent Database
[4] Philippine Patent Office Examination Guidelines (latest edition)
[5] Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent filings in Southeast Asia

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.