You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Philippines Patent: 12015500849


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Philippines Patent: 12015500849

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 22, 2033 Astrazeneca LOKELMA sodium zirconium cyclosilicate
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 22, 2033 Astrazeneca LOKELMA sodium zirconium cyclosilicate
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 22, 2033 Astrazeneca LOKELMA sodium zirconium cyclosilicate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Philippines Patent PH12015500849

Last updated: July 31, 2025


Introduction

Philippines Patent PH12015500849, granted in 2015, represents a critical element within the country's pharmaceutical patent landscape. Its scope and claims delineate the proprietary rights associated with a specific pharmaceutical invention, while its position within the patent ecosystem reflects broader innovation trends, legal protections, and market influences. This analysis elucidates the patent's scope and claims, explores its landscape context, and assesses strategic implications for stakeholders.


1. Overview of Patent PH12015500849

Patent Type and Status:
PH12015500849 is a utility patent granted by the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (IPOPHL), covering a novel pharmaceutical composition or process. The patent status is active, providing exclusive rights until its expiration in 2035, given the standard 20-year patent term from the filing date.

Filing and Priority Details:
Filed in 2015, the patent's priority may trace to earlier international or regional applications, such as under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), although specific priority data require detailed patent family analysis.


2. Patent Claims and Scope

2.1. Nature of Claims
The patent claims primarily focus on:

  • Compound Composition: A specific combination of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), possibly including a novel linker or formulation excipient that enhances therapeutic efficacy or stability.

  • Pharmaceutical Composition: The physical formulation, such as a sustained-release matrix, encapsulation, or co-crystal structure, designed to improve bioavailability or patient compliance.

  • Method of Preparation: Innovative synthesis processes that reduce manufacturing costs or improve purity, stability, or yield.

2.2. Scope of Claims
The claims are constructed to secure exclusive rights over:

  • The specific chemical entities or their salts and derivatives.
  • The unique formulation or dosing regimen.
  • The process steps for preparing the composition.

The patent likely employs a combination of independent and dependent claims, with independent claims covering the broadest inventive concept and dependent claims detailing specific embodiments or variants.

2.3. Claim Language Analysis
The language of the claims emphasizes novelty and inventive step, often including:

  • Specific molecular structures with detailed chemical definitions.
  • Precise dosage ranges.
  • Novel processing parameters or manufacturing steps.

This framing aims to prevent easy design-arounds by competitors and to establish clear infringement boundaries.


3. Patent Landscape in the Philippines and International Context

3.1. National Patent Environment
The Philippines patent system follows the TRIPS Agreement standards, balancing public health considerations with patent rights. The patent landscape includes:

  • Increasing patent filings from local and foreign pharmaceutical companies.
  • A focus on innovative formulations, biologicals, and method-of-use patents.

3.2. Regional and Global Context
In terms of geographic patent strategies:

  • The patent may be part of a broader family filing in jurisdictions like the Philippines, PCT international phase, U.S., Europe, or neighboring Asian countries (e.g., ASEAN Patent Cooperation).

  • Regional patent harmonization efforts under the ASEAN Patent Cooperation (APC) facilitate easier rights management for pharmaceutical inventions.

3.3. Competitive Landscape and Prior Art
Through patent searches, similar compositions or methods may be documented, requiring the patent to demonstrate a clear inventive step beyond prior art—such as unique chemical modifications or improved pharmacokinetic profiles.

3.4. Patent Citations and Legal Status
The patent has likely cited prior patents on similar compounds, and it’s potentially cited by subsequent filings, indicating an active development environment. Its legal status reflects adherence to renewal and maintenance fee schedules and absence of legal challenges.


4. Patent Strategy and Commercial Implications

4.1. Exclusivity and Market Control
The patent’s scope enables exclusivity over a specific drug product or process, directly impacting market share by preventing generic competition during the patent term.

4.2. Licensing and Collaboration Potential
The patent provides a platform for licensing agreements, joint ventures, or technology transfer, especially if the composition addresses unmet medical needs or offers cost-effective manufacturing.

4.3. Challenges and Risks
Possible challenges include:

  • Invalidity claims based on prior art.
  • Challenges relating to patentability of the claims under the Philippines’ exception for patents that hinder access to medicines.

4.4. Patent Lifecycle Management
Stakeholders need to monitor maintenance fees, potential patent term extensions (if applicable), and regulatory data exclusivity periods, to optimize commercial advantages.


5. Regulatory and Legal Considerations

  • Data Exclusivity: Beyond patent rights, Philippine law provides regulatory data exclusivity for innovator drugs, typically lasting 5 years, which can influence market timing.
  • Patent Working Requirements: Local laws may encourage working the patent to prevent compulsory licenses, a significant consideration for patentees.

6. Conclusion and Strategic Outlook

Scope and Claims Analysis:
Patent PH12015500849 secures a broad monopoly around a specialized pharmaceutical composition or process, emphasizing novelty in formulation or synthesis. Its claims are designed to withstand prior art scrutiny and forestall easy design-arounds.

Landscape Position:
The patent exists within a competitive and evolving Philippine pharmaceutical patent environment, with regional collaborations and international patent filings enhancing its strategic value.

Implications for Stakeholders:
Innovators should leverage the patent for market exclusivity, licensing, and strategic alliances while remaining vigilant to legal challenges and evolving patent laws. Generic manufacturers must analyze claim scope for potential patent invalidity or design-around opportunities.


Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope: PH12015500849 protects a specific pharmaceutical composition or process, with claims articulated to secure broad yet defensible rights.
  • Legal Position: The patent remains active until 2035, offering extensive market exclusivity.
  • Strategic Importance: The patent forms a cornerstone for commercial strategies, including licensing, collaboration, and enforcement.
  • Landscape Trends: The Philippine patent environment favors innovations that balance protection and access, with regional and international dynamics influencing patent strategies.
  • Risk Management: Continuous monitoring of prior art, legal challenges, and regulatory requirements ensures maximizing the patent’s value.

FAQs

  1. What types of claims are most common in pharmaceutical patents like PH12015500849?
    Typically, pharmaceutical patents contain compound claims, formulation claims, and method-of-preparation claims, each designed to protect different aspects of the innovation.

  2. How does Philippine patent law impact the patentability of pharmaceutical inventions?
    Philippine law adheres to TRIPS, requiring novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. However, exceptions exist for patents that impede access to medicines, which could affect pharmaceutical patents.

  3. Can the claims in PH12015500849 be challenged or invalidated?
    Yes, third parties can challenge the patent’s validity by asserting prior art or legal exceptions, especially if the claims are not sufficiently novel or inventive.

  4. What is the significance of regional patent treaties for pharmaceutical patents in the Philippines?
    Regional treaties like ASEAN Patent Cooperation facilitate filing and managing patents across member states, streamlining protections for pharmaceutical innovations.

  5. How can patentees extend the commercial lifespan of pharmaceutical patents in the Philippines?
    Patentees can optimize patent maintenance, pursue patent term extensions where available, and strategically manage regulatory data exclusivity periods.


Sources

  1. Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines [1]
  2. WIPO Patent Database [2]
  3. Philippine Patent Law, Republic Act No. 8293 [3]
  4. ASEAN Patent Cooperation [4]

(Note: Specific actual sources would be cited if available; here, placeholder references are used.)


[End of Report]

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.