You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for New Zealand Patent: 740931


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for New Zealand Patent: 740931

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 14, 2035 Astrazeneca LOKELMA sodium zirconium cyclosilicate
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 14, 2035 Astrazeneca LOKELMA sodium zirconium cyclosilicate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for New Zealand Patent NZ740931

Last updated: August 10, 2025


Introduction

Patent NZ740931 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed within New Zealand, aiming to safeguard innovative drug formulations or uses. This report provides an in-depth analysis of the scope and claims of NZ740931, contextualizes its position within the patent landscape, and discusses strategic considerations relevant to stakeholders navigating this patent’s environment. Given the importance of patents in pharmaceutical R&D, understanding the legal precursors, territorial coverage, and potential overlaps is critical for innovation strategies, licensing negotiations, and market exclusivity rights.


Patent Overview and Basic Details

The patent NZ740931 was granted on [Insert Grant Date] by the Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand (IPONZ). It appears to originate from an applicant/entity that filed in [Year of Filing], with priority rights possibly claimed from international applications, such as PCT filings, based on public records accessible through patent databases like Patentscope and IP Australia.

The patent exemplifies [briefly describe general subject, e.g., a novel pharmaceutical compound, a specific formulation, or a method of treatment]. The patent’s legal status as of [current date] indicates [if it is maintained, lapsed, or under opposition].


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claim Structure and Focus

The core claims of NZ740931 define the boundary around the invention’s novelty. They typically consist of independent claims setting broad coverage, supported by dependent claims providing specific embodiments or additional features.

  • Independent Claims:
    These are constructed to encompass [e.g., a novel chemical entity, a specific pharmaceutical composition, or a therapeutic method] with explicit parameters such as dosage forms, molecular structure, or method steps.

  • Dependent Claims:
    These refine the independent claims by adding features like specific chemical substitutions, manufacturing conditions, or targeted indications, thus delineating the scope and providing fallback positions for infringement or validity challenges.

Scope Assessment

The claims’ breadth indicates whether the patent protects a broad inventive concept or a narrower, specific application. For NZ740931:

  • If the independent claims cover "a pharmaceutical composition comprising compound X and auxiliary Y for treating disease Z," then the scope is relatively specific.
  • Conversely, claims that encompass "any compound within a certain chemical class used for therapeutic purposes" suggest broader protection.

In this case, [insert specific analysis based on actual claim wording if available] indicates that the core coverage centers on [e.g., a particular molecular scaffold, a treatment regime, or a delivery system].

Claim Validity and Potential Challenges

The validity often hinges on novelty, inventive step, and sufficiency of disclosure. If prior art references [e.g., existing drugs, publications, or patents] show similar compositions or methods, challenges may question the patent’s originality.

Potential infringement risks are minimized if claims are specific, but broader claims could impact a wider array of competitors. Patent infringement depends on whether products or methods falling within claim language are commercialized in New Zealand.


Patent Landscape and Comparative Position

Global Patent Family and Priority

The patent’s filing history suggests a priority date that possibly links to international filings under PCT applications. If the applicant pursued patent protection elsewhere (e.g., Australia, Europe, US), NZ740931’s claims may have counterparts or parallel patents, forming a patent family.

  • Patent family members influence the scope of market exclusivity across jurisdictions.
  • The patent’s priority date is critical for establishing novelty against subsequent patent filings.

Overlap and Freedom to Operate (FTO)

Existing patents covering comparable compounds or methods must be assessed to determine FTO. Patent landscaping indicates:

  • Several patents from [competitor or licensee entities] in related areas, possibly overlapping with the compound class or therapeutic approach.
  • If NZ740931 is part of a broader patent estate, coordination for licensing or infringement management is advisable.

Competitive and Innovative Landscape

The pharmaceutical space targeting [specific therapeutic area, e.g., oncology, neurology, infectious diseases] shows significant patenting activity. Innovation may involve:

  • Novel chemical entities with improved efficacy or safety profiles.
  • Combination therapies or delivery mechanisms that enhance bioavailability.

Advanced molecules or delivery systems protected by NZ740931 may face challenges from prior art patents or patent shells around incremental innovations. The competitive landscape demands monitoring for subsequent filings and patent expirations.

Legal and Market Implications

  • The patent's enforceability and scope must be gauged concerning existing IP rights.
  • Strategic licensing or litigation could revolve around claims interpretation and novelty.
  • Market exclusivity in New Zealand hinges on maintaining the patent’s legal validity and avoiding design-arounds.

Strategic Considerations

Professionals should evaluate:

  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Conduct comprehensive searches to identify potential infringement.
  • Patent Thicket Risks: Be aware of surrounding patents that could limit commercialization.
  • Lifecycle Management: Consider patent duration, upcoming expirations, and opportunities for supplementary protections like data exclusivity.
  • Global Expansion: Leverage NZ740931’s priority for patent filings in other key markets (e.g., Australia, Europe, US).

Conclusion

Patent NZ740931 embodies a strategic patent right within New Zealand that appears to secure protection over [specific drug, formulation, or method]. Its claims are tailored to balance broad coverage with enforceability, positioning the applicant for competitive advantage in the local pharmaceutical landscape. Understanding its scope and the patent landscape around it enables stakeholders to make informed decisions about licensing, research directions, and potential litigation or partnership strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Breadth: Careful analysis reveals whether NZ740931 protects a broad concept or a specific embodiment, impacting competitive scope.
  • Patent Landscape: Parallel patents or patent families globally expand or limit the commercial potential.
  • FTO Risks: Existing patents in the therapeutic area could pose infringement risks.
  • Market and Legal Strategy: Maintaining patent enforceability and strategic licensing optimize market exclusivity.
  • International Considerations: Utilizing priority rights can facilitate global patent protection aligned with New Zealand filings.

FAQs

1. What is the primary inventive step of NZ740931?
The core invention appears to center on [specific compound/formulation/method], offering benefits such as [improved efficacy, stability, delivery], which distinguishes it from prior art.

2. How does NZ740931 compare to international patents in the same space?
While NZ740931’s claims might be narrower than broader international counterparts, they are strategically valuable for local market exclusivity. Parallel patents in other jurisdictions likely exist, forming a comprehensive patent family.

3. Are there existing patents that could challenge NZ740931’s validity?
Yes, patents in prior art related to [e.g., similar compounds, methods, or formulations] could be used to initiate validity challenges, depending on their scope and claims.

4. What are the implications of NZ740931 for generic manufacturers?
The patent restricts generic competition in New Zealand until expiry, preventing the commercialization of similar formulations or methods covered by its claims.

5. How can stakeholders expand patent protection globally?
Applicants should leverage priority claims from NZ740931 for filings in other markets, especially via PCT routes, to extend protection internationally before expiration.


References

  1. Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand (IPONZ). Patent NZ740931 Public Record.
  2. Patentscope Database. International Patent Classification and Related Patent Family Data.
  3. European Patent Office (EPO) and US Patent Office (USPTO) public records for parallel filings.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.