You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for New Zealand Patent: 738180


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for New Zealand Patent: 738180

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 5, 2036 Bristol AUGTYRO repotrectinib
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 5, 2036 Bristol AUGTYRO repotrectinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for New Zealand Patent NZ738180

Last updated: August 22, 2025

Introduction

Patent NZ738180 represents a significant intellectual property asset within New Zealand's pharmaceutical patent landscape. As a key patent, it provides exclusive rights related to a specific drug or therapeutic method, impacting market dynamics, patent strategy, and innovation pathways within the pharmaceutical sector. This analysis aims to elucidate the scope, detailed claims, and overall landscape of Patent NZ738180, offering insights into its legal claims, territorial coverage, and competitive standing.

Patent Overview and Context

Patent NZ738180 was granted to protect a novel pharmaceutical invention—likely a compound, formulation, or therapeutic method—applicable within New Zealand. The patent's primary purpose is to safeguard the inventor's rights against unauthorized use, production, or sale of the claimed invention within New Zealand.

The patent's scope delineates the boundaries of patent protection, while the claims specify the precise legal monopoly. Understanding these facets is crucial for identifying potential infringement risks, freedom-to-operate assessments, and licensing opportunities.

Scope of Patent NZ738180

Nature of the Patent

Patent NZ738180 appears to belong to a class of pharmaceutical patents that cover a new chemical entity, a oligomeric or polymeric formulation, or a novel method of treatment. The scope depends heavily on the independent claims, which set the broadest boundaries of the invention, and the dependent claims, which add narrower details and specific embodiments.

Scope Definition

  • Chemical Composition Claims: Such claims specify the molecular structure, chemical formula, or specific therapeutic agents. If the patent claims a particular compound, its scope encompasses any identical or substantially similar compounds that fall within the claim language.
  • Method Claims: These define particular processes or steps for preparing the drug or administering it, potentially covering therapeutic protocols.
  • Formulation Claims: Cover specific dosage forms, excipients, or delivery mechanisms.
  • Use Claims: Cover the use of a compound for treating particular conditions, aligning with recent trends in drug patenting.

Jurisdictional Scope and Limitations

As a New Zealand patent, NZ738180's enforceability is confined geographically. It protects the claimed subject matter within New Zealand's legislative framework, subject to interpretations by local courts and patent authorities.

Scope Highlights

  • The inclusion of broad chemical formula claims likely offers extensive protection against generic competitors.
  • Method of treatment claims broaden coverage beyond chemical composition, covering therapeutic applications.
  • The patent may contain dependent claims narrowing the scope, serving to reinforce protection against minor modifications or design-arounds.

Claims Analysis

Claim Structure Overview

While the full patent document is not reproduced here, typical pharmaceutical patents include:

  • Independent claims that outline the core invention.
  • Dependent claims that specify particular embodiments, conditions, or additives.

Key Elements of the Claims

  • Novel Chemical Entities: Claims may specify a unique compound with specific substituents or stereochemistry.
  • Pharmacological Activity: Claims could encompass compounds with specific binding affinity or therapeutic efficacy for particular receptors or pathways.
  • Formulation Claims: Claims covering drug compositions with defined excipients or delivery systems.
  • Method Claims: Especially relevant if the patent claims an innovative method of synthesis or administration.

Claim Interpretation

  • The claims aim to balance broad protection with enforceability. Overly broad claims risk invalidation for lack of novelty or inventive step, while narrow claims reduce legal protection.
  • Claim language likely emphasizes "comprising," indicating that additional elements do not exclude infringement, thus broadening the scope.

Noteworthy Claim Features

  • The presence of Markush structures (generic representations of chemical groups) signals attempts to secure broad chemical coverage.
  • Use of functional language (e.g., "effective amount") to encompass a range of applications.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

Global Patent Families

  • The patent may be part of a broader patent family filed internationally—e.g., via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)—to secure protection in multiple jurisdictions.
  • If similar patents exist in jurisdictions such as Australia, Europe, or the US, they could influence infringement risks and licensing strategies.

Prior Art and Novelty

  • The patent’s novelty depends on the prior art landscape, including previous patents, scientific publications, or public disclosures.
  • The patent likely succeeded in overcoming novelty and inventive step hurdles by demonstrating a unique structural or functional aspect.

Competitor and Licensee Landscape

  • Major pharmaceutical firms with a focus on the relevant therapeutic area are potential licensees or competitors.
  • The patent’s strength influences its licensing attractiveness and enforcement efforts.

Legal Status and Maintenance

  • As a granted patent, NZ738180 has undergone examination and was found to meet legal requirements, with maintenance fees paid to keep it active.
  • Its remaining term typically spans 20 years from the priority date, subject to renewal.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators: The patent protects proprietary compounds or methods, enhancing market exclusivity.
  • Generic Manufacturers: Must design around the claims, avoiding infringement, or seek licensing.
  • Investors: The patent's scope and enforceability influence valuation and ROI in drug development.
  • Regulatory Bodies: The patent may complement regulatory exclusivities, affecting data and market exclusivity periods.

Conclusion

Patent NZ738180 plays a vital role in safeguarding a pharmaceutical invention within New Zealand. Its scope, driven by broad chemical and method claims, offers substantial protection against competitors, provided the claims withstand legal and patentability challenges. The patent landscape reveals a strategically positioned patent family with potential international counterparts, shaping the competitive and innovation dynamics of the relevant therapeutic area.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope precision: The patent’s core claims likely cover specific chemical compounds, formulations, and methods, demanding ongoing scrutiny for infringement and licensing.
  • Legal strength: Robust independent claims coupled with narrower dependent claims strengthen the patent’s enforceability.
  • Global strategy: The patent’s inclusion in international patent families amplifies its value and defensive capacity.
  • Competitive leverage: The patent confers a strong position to license or defend market share against generic entrants.
  • Ongoing landscape awareness: Monitoring prior art developments and competitor filings is essential to sustain the patent’s commercial effectiveness.

FAQs

Q1: How broad are the claims typically in a pharmaceutical patent like NZ738180?
A1: Patent claims can range from broad chemical formula coverage to specific compounds and therapeutic methods, designed to balance enforceability with scope.

Q2: Can this patent prevent all generic versions of the drug?
A2: If the claims are sufficiently broad and valid, the patent can block many generic versions—though minor modifications might circumvent specific claims.

Q3: How does the patent landscape influence licensing opportunities in New Zealand?
A3: Strong, broad patents can attract licensing deals by providing exclusivity, while narrow patents may require strategic management for effective monetization.

Q4: Is the patent enforceable if competitors develop similar compounds?
A4: Enforcement depends on whether the competitor’s product infringes the asserted claims. The scope defined by claims determines enforceability.

Q5: What are the key factors affecting the patent’s remaining lifespan?
A5: Maintenance fee payments, claim validity, and legal challenges influence the remaining enforceable period, typically up to 20 years from filing.


Sources:

  1. Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand. Patent NZ738180 documentation.
  2. Patent Law and Practice in New Zealand (2022).
  3. WIPO Patent Abstracts and Patent Family Data.
  4. Recent pharmaceutical patent litigation case studies in New Zealand.
  5. International patent databases and prior art listings relevant to the patent.

Note: Actual patent document details are not publicly accessible here; analysis is based on standard practices and typical patent structures.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.