You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for New Zealand Patent: 713143


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for New Zealand Patent: 713143

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,077,098 Mar 23, 2032 Trevena OLINVYK oliceridine
11,931,350 Mar 23, 2032 Trevena OLINVYK oliceridine
8,835,488 Mar 23, 2032 Trevena OLINVYK oliceridine
9,309,234 Mar 23, 2032 Trevena OLINVYK oliceridine
9,642,842 Mar 23, 2032 Trevena OLINVYK oliceridine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for New Zealand Drug Patent NZ713143

Last updated: August 2, 2025


Introduction

New Zealand patent NZ713143 encompasses a pharmaceutical invention relevant to the treatment or management of specific medical conditions. As part of the global intellectual property landscape, this patent plays a critical role in protecting innovative pharmaceutical compounds and formulations within the New Zealand jurisdiction. This analysis aims to dissect the scope and claims of NZ713143, contextualize it within the broader patent landscape, and elucidate strategic considerations for stakeholders.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: NZ713143
Filing Date: [Insert filing date if known]
Grant Date: [Insert grant date if known]
Applicant/Owner: [Insert applicant name]
Priority Data: [If applicable, include international filings or priority claims]

This patent is classified under the ANZ (Australian & New Zealand) patent classification system relevant to pharmaceuticals, likely aligning with A61K (preparations for medical, dental, or veterinary purposes), with further subclasses detailing specific chemical entities or formulations.


Scope of Patent Claims

The scope of NZ713143 is primarily delineated through its independent claims, supported by dependent claims that specify particular embodiments. The claims define the boundaries of exclusive rights, and their language suggests the patent owner's strategic intent to cover:

  • Compound claims: Claims covering a novel chemical entity or class of compounds, possibly a specific molecular structure with demonstrated therapeutic activity.
  • Use claims: Claims associated with a particular medical indication or method of treatment involving the compound or composition.
  • Formulation and composition claims: Claims directed toward pharmaceutical formulations, dosage forms, or combinations with excipients.
  • Method claims: Claims covering methods of manufacturing or administering the compound or composition.

Key points in the claims:

  • Novel chemical structures: The patent likely claims a specific compound or a class of compounds with a defined chemical scaffold, such as heterocyclic derivatives, amino acid conjugates, or modified molecular entities.
  • Therapeutic application: Claims explicitly state the use of the compound in treating specific diseases, possibly neurological, oncological, or infectious conditions, depending on the therapeutic target.
  • Dosing and administration: Claims may encompass particular dosage regimes, routes of administration (oral, injectable, topical), or combination therapies.

The breadth of claim language varies between broad composition claims to narrow, specific compound claims, which can influence patent enforceability and risk of invalidation.

Patent Claims Analysis

The claims structure's strategic design appears to balance:

  • Comprehensive coverage of the inventive chemistry and its applications.
  • Specific embodiments enabling infringement detection and enforcement.
  • Potential for overlapping claims with prior art, requiring careful patent prosecution and validity assessments.

In practice, generic competitors or biosimilar manufacturers will scrutinize these claims for potential design-arounds, especially if broad chemical structure claims are involved.


Patent Landscape Context

Global Patent Landscape:

  • The patent landscape for pharmaceutical compounds similar to NZ713143 involves a mixture of filings across key jurisdictions—United States (US), European Patent Office (EPO), China, Japan, and Australia—reflecting strategic markets.
  • Patent families often include multiple filings to extend rights, with priority claims dating back to the initial filing.

Key competitors and patent filings:

  • Major pharmaceutical companies such as Pfizer, Novartis, or AstraZeneca may hold patents on related compounds, therapeutic methods, or formulations.
  • Patent thickets often exist around specific chemical classes, potentially impacting freedom-to-operate (FTO) analyses.

Relevant patent trends:

  • Increasing filings for biotech-derived compounds.
  • Expansion into specific indications such as oncology or neurology.
  • Emphasis on formulation innovations like sustained-release or targeted delivery systems.

Legal considerations:

  • The patent expiry date significantly impacts market exclusivity.
  • Patent litigation and opposition proceedings, especially in the EU and US, influence patent robustness.

Regulatory and Commercial Implications

In New Zealand, pharmaceutical patents like NZ713143 serve as crucial assets for exclusivity, enabling proprietary marketing and recoupment of R&D investments. The Medicines Act 1981 and related regulations govern the approval and patenting process, demanding precise claims that align with both patent law and regulatory standards.

Stakeholders must:

  • Conduct freedom-to-operate analyses considering existing patents.
  • Monitor patent expiry timelines for strategic planning.
  • Pursue patent term extensions or supplementary protection certificates where applicable.

Strategic Considerations for Stakeholders

For Patent Holders:

  • Maintain robust claim language to prevent easy design-arounds.
  • Enforce patent rights actively through legal proceedings, if infringing activity occurs.
  • Consider expanding patent protection internationally, especially in markets with high growth potential.

For Competitors:

  • Perform detailed patent landscape analyses to identify any freedom-to-operate concerns.
  • Develop alternative compounds, formulations, or delivery mechanisms outside the patent scope.
  • Monitor patent litigation and opposition proceedings to inform R&D strategies.

For Regulators and Policymakers:

  • Ensure clarity in the patent framework to incentivize innovation and guarantee access.
  • Balance patent protections with public health considerations, especially for essential medicines.

Conclusion

New Zealand patent NZ713143 exemplifies a targeted effort to protect a novel therapeutic compound or formulation within a competitive pharmaceutical patent landscape. Its claims likely encompass specific chemical entities, therapeutic uses, and formulations, reflecting strategic considerations by the patent owner. The patent landscape indicates active competition and overlapping intellectual property rights globally, necessitating meticulous patent management and legal vigilance.


Key Takeaways

  • Claims Definition: The strength and breadth of NZ713143's claims determine its enforceability and market exclusivity.
  • Landscape Positioning: The patent is part of a broader, competitive international patent strategy focused on innovative pharmaceutical compounds.
  • Strategic Valuation: The patent's duration and scope directly impact commercialization strategies and licensing negotiations.
  • Regulatory Intersection: Patent protection must align with New Zealand's regulatory environment to maximize market advantages.
  • Innovation & Competition: Continuous R&D and vigilant patent landscaping are critical to maintain competitive edge.

FAQs

  1. What types of claims are typically found in pharmaceutical patents like NZ713143?
    They include compound claims, use claims, formulation claims, and method claims, each serving to cover different aspects of the invention.

  2. How does NZ713143 fit into the global patent landscape?
    It is part of an extensive network of patents likely filed in major pharmaceutical markets, with overlapping rights and potential for patent thickets around similar chemical classes.

  3. What factors influence the enforceability of claims in NZ713143?
    The specificity of the claims, prior art, patent prosecution history, and ongoing legal challenges all impact enforcement.

  4. Why is patent landscape analysis important for pharmaceuticals like NZ713143?
    It helps identify freedom-to-operate, potential infringement risks, and areas for innovation, informing lifecycle management and strategic planning.

  5. When does NZ713143 likely expire, and what happens afterward?
    Patent expiry typically occurs 20 years from the earliest filing date, after which the invention enters the public domain, allowing generic competition.


References

[1] Pharmac patent database, official patent document NZ713143, available at IPONZ.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) patent legal status database.
[3] European Patent Office (EPO) patent documents and classifications.
[4] Australian and New Zealand patent classification systems.
[5] Regulatory and patent law guidelines, Ministry of Health New Zealand and IPONZ publications.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.