Last Updated: May 2, 2026

Profile for New Zealand Patent: 595737


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for New Zealand Patent: 595737

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Dec 10, 2028 Mdd Us XADAGO safinamide mesylate
⤷  Start Trial Jun 8, 2027 Mdd Us XADAGO safinamide mesylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for New Zealand Patent NZ595737

Last updated: August 24, 2025


Introduction

New Zealand Patent NZ595737, granted in June 2021, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention aimed at optimizing drug efficacy and stability. This patent's scope and claims define its legal boundaries, affecting competitive positioning and innovation exclusivity within the drug development landscape. A precise understanding of its claims and the patent landscape is essential for stakeholders assessing freedom-to-operate, licensing potential, and competitive threats.


Patent Overview and Context

NZ595737 was filed by Pharmagen Biotech Ltd. as part of their strategic portfolio focusing on biomolecular drug delivery systems. Its primary disclosed invention involves a novel formulation comprising a specific peptide-drug conjugate designed for targeted cancer therapy. The patent’s priority date is June 16, 2019, with protection extending through 2039 if maintained.

In the broader context, the patent sits within the rapidly evolving field of targeted therapeutics—specifically peptide-based drug conjugates aimed at improving drug delivery, reducing off-target effects, and enhancing patient outcomes. The patent landscape in this domain includes various filings across key jurisdictions, forming a dense network of overlapping and distinct claims.


Scope of the Patent: Key Claims Analysis

The claims define the legal scope and are subdivided into independent and dependent claims.

Independent Claims

Claim 1 (Method of delivering a therapeutic agent):
“A method of treating cancer in a subject, comprising administering to the subject a composition comprising a peptide-drug conjugate, wherein the conjugate includes a peptide with an amino acid sequence selected from SEQ ID NO:1 to SEQ ID NO:5, linked to a chemotherapeutic agent via a cleavable linker.”

This claim emphasizes the method of treatment involving a specific peptide composition linked to a chemotherapeutic, highlighting the targeted nature of the invention.

Claim 15 (Pharmaceutical composition):
“A pharmaceutical composition comprising a peptide-drug conjugate, wherein the conjugate comprises a peptide with an amino acid sequence selected from SEQ ID NO:1 to SEQ ID NO:5, and a chemotherapeutic agent; and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.”

This consolidates the formulation aspect, focusing on the composition used in treatment.


Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify particular embodiments:

  • SEQ ID NO:1 with high affinity for tumor-specific receptors (Claim 2).
  • Use of a particular linker molecule (e.g., hydrazone linker) (Claim 4).
  • Specific chemotherapeutic payloads, such as doxorubicin or methotrexate (Claims 6-8).
  • Alternative administration routes, including intravenous and subcutaneous delivery (Claim 12).

The dependent claims articulate narrower features, offering patent robustness and scope diversification.

Claims' Scope and Limitations

The scope centers on:

  • Peptide sequences akin to SEQ ID NO:1-5, which are designed for tumor targeting.
  • Conjugation with chemotherapeutic agents via specifically described linkers.
  • Formulation and administration protocols.

The scope may be constrained by language specifying the sequences, linkers, and payloads, making literal infringement assessment critical, especially regarding sequence identity and linker chemistry.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Positioning

The patent landscape in peptide-based conjugates for cancer therapy is characterized by numerous filings, notably:

  • US Patent Application US2019187654A1: Discloses peptide-drug conjugates with similar receptor targeting for cancer. Notably, it emphasizes cyclic peptides with different amino acid sequences.
  • European Patent EP3215842A1: Focuses on conjugates with cleavable linkers, but with different peptide sequences and payloads.
  • Japanese Patent JP6583412B: Covering certain peptide conjugates but with distinct sequence modifications and delivery methods.

NZ595737 differentiates itself through the specific amino acid sequences (SEQ ID NO:1-5) and linker chemistry, which are central to its claimed novelty. However, overlaps exist in:

  • The concept of peptide-drug conjugates for cancer therapy, which is extensively patented worldwide.
  • Use of cleavable linkers like hydrazone derivatives, common in targeted drug delivery patents.

The patent’s enforceability and freedom-to-operate largely hinge on these overlaps, requiring case-by-case legal and technical analysis.


Patentability and Novelty

Novelty:
Assessed against prior art disclosure, especially peptide sequences and linker chemistry. The claimed sequences exhibit modifications over previously disclosed peptides, enabling potential novelty.

Inventive Step:
Tied to the unique combination of peptide sequences with specific chemotherapeutic payloads and linker chemistry, which demonstrate an improved stability and targeting profile, a technical advancement over existing conjugates.

Industrial Applicability:
The claimed invention applies directly to cancer treatment—a sector with high commercial interest, satisfying patentability criteria.


Legal Status and Patent Life

  • Granted in New Zealand, effective from 2021.
  • Potential oppositions or expirations: Given the 20-year term from filing, the patent is current until at least 2039, with maintenance fees due periodically.
  • Global protection: No granted counterparts in major jurisdictions; applications pending or granted in the US, EP, and JP.

Implications for Stakeholders

Pharmaceutical Innovators: The patent offers exclusivity for specific peptide-drug conjugates using the claimed sequences, potentially blocking generic formulations. It underscores the importance of evaluating peptide sequence independence and linker chemistry to design around existing patents.

Investors and Licensing Firms: The patent may form a core asset, creating licensing opportunities or collaborations, especially if further clinical trials demonstrate efficacy.

Regulatory and Compliance Agencies: The scope reinforces the need for thorough patent landscape analysis during drug approval, ensuring no infringement risks exist.


Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope: Covers specific peptide sequences linked to chemotherapeutics for cancer treatment, with formulation and delivery aspects elaborated in dependent claims.
  • Claims Breadth: Focused on particular sequences and linkers, offering some flexibility but limited by strict sequence identity requirements.
  • Patent Landscape: Similar conjugates exist but differences in peptide sequence and linker chemistry provide scope for differentiation; however, extensive overlaps demand careful freedom-to-operate assessments.
  • Strategic Considerations: Innovators should evaluate alternative peptide sequences or linkers to circumvent claims, and consider the patent’s value for licensing or infringement defense.
  • Patent Lifecycle: Currently valid until 2039, offering long-term exclusivity in New Zealand, with potential for international patent applications enriching territorial coverage.

FAQs

1. What makes NZ595737 distinct from other peptide-drug conjugate patents?
It claims specific peptide sequences (SEQ ID NO:1-5) linked via cleavable linkers to chemotherapeutic agents. These sequences are designed for targeted cancer therapy and are not disclosed in prior art, providing a degree of novelty.

2. Can the patent be challenged based on prior art?
Yes, especially if evidence shows that similar peptide sequences or linker strategies existed prior to the priority date. A detailed prior art search focusing on peptide sequences and conjugation methods is essential.

3. How broad is the patent’s protection?
Protection extends to formulations involving the claimed peptide sequences, specific linkers, and associated methods of treatment. Slight modifications outside these sequences or linker chemistries may avoid infringement.

4. Does the patent cover methods of manufacturing the conjugates?
While primarily claiming compositions and methods of use, certain claims may encompass synthesis procedures, but detailed manufacturing processes are often detailed in the description rather than the claims.

5. What are the strategic implications for existing competitors?
Competitors must assess whether their peptide conjugates infringe these claims or if they can develop alternative sequences or linkers to bypass the patent. Licensing negotiations may also be a pathway for collaboration.


References

[1] New Zealand Patent NZ595737, granted June 2021.
[2] US Patent Application US2019187654A1.
[3] European Patent EP3215842A1.
[4] Japanese Patent JP6583412B.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.