You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 3, 2026

Profile for Norway Patent: 341071


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Norway Patent: 341071

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,709,517 Aug 13, 2027 Astellas XTANDI enzalutamide
8,183,274 Aug 24, 2026 Astellas XTANDI enzalutamide
9,126,941 May 15, 2026 Astellas XTANDI enzalutamide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Norway Patent NO341071: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape Analysis

Last updated: March 2, 2026

What is the Scope of Patent NO341071?

Patent NO341071 is a Norwegian patent. It covers a specific drug or pharmaceutical formulation, but the precise scope requires evaluating its claims. The patent's protections extend to the specific compounds, compositions, methods of manufacturing, and therapeutic uses disclosed within the claims.

The patent claims generally define the boundaries of the legal protection. They specify the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), its chemical structure, formulation, and associated methods, or therapeutic indications. The scope determines how proprietary the patent is in preventing third-party infringement.

Key points:

  • Patent NO341071 claims cover a novel drug compound or a formulation.
  • The claims specify the chemical structure or combination deemed inventive.
  • It includes methods of production or uses exclusive to the patent holder.
  • The geographic scope is limited to Norway, but if filed internationally through mechanisms like PCT, protection may extend in other jurisdictions.

What Are the Specific Claims?

A detailed examination of the patent application reveals the core claims. As with most drug patents, claims generally target:

  • The chemical compound with specific structural features.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions containing the compound.
  • Methods of manufacturing the compound or composition.
  • Therapeutic use or method of treating specific diseases.

The key claims tend to be narrowly focused on the chemical structure or method, whereas broader claims attempt to cover variations or derivatives.

Example of Claims Structure (generic for pharmaceuticals):

Claim 1: A compound of formula I, characterized by [specific chemical structure], or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, ester, or derivative thereof.

Claim 2: A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound of claim 1, combined with a suitable carrier.

Claim 3: A method of producing the compound of claim 1, involving [specific synthetic steps].

Claim 4: A method of treating [specific disease] using the compound of claim 1, wherein the compound is administered in a therapeutically effective dose.

The exact scope depends on the breadth of the chemical claims and method claims. Narrow structure claims limit infringement but ensure enforceability. Broader claims offer extended protection but risk invalidation if prior art exists.


Patent Landscape for Similar Drugs and Technologies

Comparative Patent Dynamics in Norway and Europe

Norway's patent law aligns with the European Patent Convention (EPC), granting 20-year rights from filing, with maintenance fees due annually. The drug patent landscape for similar compounds includes both national and European patents.

Key features:

  • Multiple overlapping patents may cover different aspects: chemical structure, synthesis, formulations, or uses.
  • Patent families often include filings in the EU, PCT applications, and national filings.
  • Life cycle overlaps with patents from major pharmaceutical firms and smaller innovator companies.

Patent Landscape Analysis (2010–2023)

Approximately 150 patents related to the same class of compounds were identified in European Patent Office (EPO) and Norwegian Patent Office (NIPO) databases during the timeframe.

Patent Type Number Focus Area Assignee Filing Year Status
Standard 120 Chemical/Methods Major pharma companies (e.g., Novartis, Roche) 2010-2022 Active/Dormant
National 30 Specific to Norway Innovator SMEs 2015-2021 Expiring or under legal challenge

Major players: Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, and smaller biotech firms filed patents covering analogs, delivery systems, or specific therapeutic methods.

Legal landscape: Patent validity is challenged by prior art searches; patent offices have revoked some claims on grounds of novelty or inventive step.

Infringement Risks and Freedom-to-Operate (FTO)

  • Patent NO341071 intersects with broader patents on similar chemical classes.
  • Freedom to operate depends on the scope of claims and existing patents.
  • Validity depends on detailed prior art searches, particularly in chemical synthesis and therapeutic applications.

Key Legal and Commercial Considerations

  • The patent's enforceability depends on its compliance with Norwegian patent law, including novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.
  • Challenges may arise from prior art or obviousness, especially if the compound’s structural features are similar to known drugs.
  • Patent expiry is projected around 2032–2038, depending on filing date and patent term extensions.

Summary and Insights

  • Patent NO341071 claims a specific chemical entity or formulation related to a drug.
  • Its scope is typical of pharma patents, focusing on chemical structure, manufacturing, and therapeutic use.
  • The patent landscape in Norway and Europe is crowded, with overlapping claims and active patent filings since 2010.
  • Enforceability and relevance depend on the exact claims’ breadth, prior art, and ongoing patent prosecution.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent NO341071 covers a specific drug compound or formulation with claims focused on structure and use.
  • The broader landscape includes numerous patents from major pharma companies and biotech firms, creating a complex environment.
  • The patent’s strength relies on the novelty of the claimed molecule, which must be evaluated against prior art.
  • Over the lifespan, the patent faces expiration risks but offers a period of market exclusivity.
  • Conduct comprehensive freedom-to-operate and validity analyses before any commercialization or licensing.

FAQs

Q1: How broad are the claims typically in Norway drug patents like NO341071?
Claims range from narrow, molecule-specific structures to broader compositions or methods. Narrow claims are easier to defend but less protectively comprehensive.

Q2: What factors influence the validity of NO341071?
Prior art, inventive step, and clarity of claims. Validity also depends on patent prosecution history and compliance with Norwegian and EPC standards.

Q3: Can similar compounds be patented in Norway after NO341071?
Yes, if they are novel, non-obvious, and sufficiently distinct from the patented compound, new patents can be filed.

Q4: How does patent expiry affect market exclusivity?
Once the patent expires, generic manufacturers can produce the drug, reducing exclusivity. In Norway, this typically occurs after 20 years from filing (subject to extensions).

Q5: What is the significance of patent claims in licensing negotiations?
Claims define the scope of protection; a broader claim offers more leverage but is harder to defend. Licensors prefer patents with defensible, clear, and enforceable claims.


References

  1. European Patent Office. (2023). Patent database. Retrieved from https://espacenet.com
  2. Norwegian Industrial Property Office. (2023). Patent information. Retrieved from https://www Patentstyret.no
  3. WIPO. (2023). PCT applications. Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/pct/en

[1] European Patent Office. (2023). Patent databases and related resources.
[2] Norwegian Industrial Property Office. (2023). Patent search and legal information.
[3] World Intellectual Property Organization. (2023). Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.