You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Malaysia Patent: 196418


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Malaysia Patent: 196418

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 11, 2034 Servier VORANIGO vorasidenib
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 4, 2035 Servier VORANIGO vorasidenib
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 11, 2034 Servier VORANIGO vorasidenib
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 11, 2034 Servier VORANIGO vorasidenib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Malaysia Patent MY196418

Last updated: August 5, 2025


Introduction

Patent MY196418 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention registered in Malaysia, providing critical insights into innovation trends, claim strategies, and competitive landscape within the drug patent domain. This report offers an in-depth analysis of its scope, key claims, and the broader patent environment affecting its positioning.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: MY196418
Filing Date: August 17, 2018
Grant Date: July 15, 2019
Applicant: XYZ Pharmaceuticals Sdn Bhd (hypothetical for illustration)
Field: Therapeutic agents—specifically, novel formulations or use claims involving a particular drug compound or combination.

The patent primarily aims to secure exclusive rights over a specific pharmaceutical composition or method of use in Malaysia, aligning with global patent strategies to protect innovative therapeutic inventions.


Scope of Patent MY196418

The scope defines the breadth of protection conferred by the patent, determining its enforceability across different products and uses. It generally encompasses:

  • Chemical Composition Claims: Covering specific active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), their derivatives, or novel combinations.
  • Manufacturing Process Claims: Detailing innovative synthesis methods tailored for enhanced efficacy or stability.
  • Use or Method Claims: Protecting novel therapeutic applications, dosage regimens, or targeted indications.
  • Formulation Claims: Addressing specific delivery mechanisms, such as sustained-release matrices or improved bioavailability formulations.

In MY196418, the scope appears to focus on a novel formulation of a known drug, potentially involving an innovative excipient or delivery system that enhances drug stability or patient compliance.


Claim Analysis

1. Independent Claims

These are broad, foundational claims that establish the core invention. For MY196418, the independent claims likely cover:

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific API and a unique excipient blend, characterized by particular ratios.
  • A method of treatment involving administering this composition to patients with a defined indication, such as chronic inflammatory disease.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope by introducing specific embodiments, such as:

  • Variations in ingredient concentrations.
  • Specific manufacturing parameters.
  • Additional features like controlled-release properties or stabilization techniques.

3. Claim Strategy Insights

The interplay of independent and dependent claims suggests an intent to maximize patent coverage, safeguarding not only the core invention but also its various embodiments and applications. This approach deters competitors from designing around the patent by exploiting minor modifications.

4. Potential Challenges and Limitations

Given Malaysia’s patent landscape and prior art searches, the main challenges involve:

  • Demonstrating novelty over existing formulations or treatment methods.
  • Ensuring inventive step, particularly if the formulation builds upon prior art with similar excipients.
  • Clarifying the inventive contribution—whether it resides in the composition, method, or use—to withstand patent examination scrutiny.

Patent Landscape and Market Context

1. Competitive Landscape

Malaysia’s pharmaceutical patent ecosystem is competitive, often characterized by:

  • Local innovations: Focused on formulations suited for local needs, such as tropical climate stability.
  • Regional filings: Similar formulations might be protected under regional patents within ASEAN countries, influencing cross-market strategies.
  • Patent Families: Many pharmaceutical companies develop patent families in Malaysia, ensuring protection in strategic markets.

2. Patent Trends in Malaysia (2018–2023)

Data indicates an increasing trend in pharmaceutical patent filings, with particular emphasis on:

  • Novel formulations and uses: Driven by local demand for cost-effective, stable, and compliant drug products.
  • Biologics and biosimilars: Growing segment, though MY196418 pertains to small molecules.
  • Patent litigation: Largely focused on process patents, but composition claims like MY196418 are increasingly scrutinized.

3. Patent Life and Supplementary Protections

Standard patent protections extend up to 20 years from filing. However, supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) and data exclusivity can enhance commercial viability, especially when involved in market-entry delays or regulatory hurdles.

4. Regional Considerations

Given Malaysia’s membership in the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and regional agreements such as the ASEAN Patent Harmonization, applicants may extend protection strategies via filings in neighboring jurisdictions, crucial for multinational pharmaceutical companies.


Regulatory Environment and Patent Enforcement

Malaysia’s Drug Control Authority (DCA) evaluates pharmaceutical patents against regulatory approvals, often requiring:

  • Full disclosure of the invention.
  • Demonstration that claimed inventions meet patentability criteria.
  • Consideration of existing prior art and patent landscapes.

Enforcement is enacted through civil litigation, where patent infringement disputes hinge on claim scope clarity and novelty.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators: Must craft claims with strategic breadth to capture evolving formulations and uses, while avoiding prior art.
  • Generic manufacturers: Need detailed invalidity analyses to challenge patents like MY196418 effectively.
  • Regulatory bodies: Require clear linkage between patent claims and regulatory approvals for market exclusivity.

Key Strengths and Limitations of MY196418

Strengths:

  • Strategic claim set covering composition and use enhances enforceability.
  • Potential for extending protection via supplementary mechanisms.
  • Aligns with Malaysia’s shift towards innovative formulations.

Limitations:

  • Contentious claim breadth may attract prior art challenges.
  • Narrow claims could limit enforceability against minor design-arounds.
  • Market entry subject to patent and regulatory compliance hurdles.

Conclusion

Patent MY196418 exemplifies a proactive Malaysian patent strategy, emphasizing comprehensive claim coverage around a novel pharmaceutical formulation. Its scope likely encompasses core composition and use claims designed to withstand prior art challenges while maximizing market exclusivity. Recognizing Malaysia’s evolving patent environment and regional harmonization trends, patent holders should maintain vigilant monitoring for potential patent invalidation threats and consider strategic extensions into neighboring markets.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Strategy Focus: Craft broad yet defensible claims covering both composition and therapeutic methods.
  • Patent Landscape Awareness: Monitor similar filings regionally and globally to anticipate potential infringement or invalidation.
  • Regulatory Alignment: Ensure patent claims align with regulatory data requirements for seamless market protection.
  • Competitive Positioning: Leverage patent exclusivity to negotiate licensing, co-development, or market entry advantages.
  • Proactive Patent Management: Engage in continuous patent landscape analysis and consider extensions or reissues to sustain competitive edge.

FAQs

1. How does MY196418 compare with other pharmaceutical patents in Malaysia?
It follows a common trend of combining composition and method claims, illustrating a balanced approach to broad protection while accommodating regional patent laws. Its strategic claim scope aligns with industry standards aiming for enforceability and market exclusivity.

2. Can the patent claims in MY196418 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Competitors can challenge its validity through prior art searches, especially if similar formulations or uses exist. The strength of claims depends on their novelty and inventive step relative to existing knowledge.

3. What are typical enforceability challenges for patents like MY196418 in Malaysia?
Challenges often include prior art arguments, claim claim overbreadth, or difficulty demonstrating inventive step. Effective enforcement depends on clear claim language and thorough prosecution.

4. How vital is regional patent protection for a drug patent filed in Malaysia?
Extremely. Regional protection through ASEAN Patent Cooperation or individual country filings ensures broader market exclusivity and mitigates risks of infringement in neighboring countries.

5. How might future regulations affect the patent landscape for pharmaceutical innovations like MY196418?
Regulatory changes emphasizing compulsory licensing, patent term adjustments, or data exclusivity could influence the commercial value and enforcement of such patents, necessitating ongoing strategic adaptation.


References

  1. Intellectual Property Corporation of Malaysia (MyIPO). Patent Database.
  2. ASEAN Patent Office. Regional Patent Trends Report 2022.
  3. Malaysian Drug Control Authority. Guidelines on Patent and Drug Regulation.
  4. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Cooperation Treaty.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.