You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Mexico Patent: 2023002324


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Mexico Patent: 2023002324

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,561,659 May 4, 2037 Sun Pharm Inds Inc LEQSELVI deuruxolitinib phosphate
12,076,323 May 4, 2037 Sun Pharm Inds Inc LEQSELVI deuruxolitinib phosphate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of MX2023002324: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction

The patent MX2023002324 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention filed in Mexico, potentially representing significant advancements within its therapeutic domain. A meticulous review of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape provides stakeholders—such as pharmaceutical companies, investors, and legal professionals—with insights into its strategic value, enforceability, and competitive positioning.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: MX2023002324
Filed: 2023 (approximate)
Status: Pending or recently granted (depending on official update)
Applicants: Typically, applicants are major pharmaceutical entities or research institutions; precise applicant data should be verified through the IMPI (Mexican Institute of Industrial Property).


Scope of the Patent

The scope of MX2023002324 centers on inventive pharmaceutical compositions, methods of use, and possibly manufacturing processes. It aims to protect proprietary molecular entities, formulations, or therapeutic indications.

The patent likely covers:

  • Novelty aspects of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) or its derivatives.
  • Specific formulations that optimize stability, bioavailability, or targeted delivery.
  • Methods of treatment employing the API, including dosage regimens or application protocols.
  • Manufacturing processes that enhance yield, purity, or efficiency.

The scope’s breadth hinges on the claims' wording, which balances breadth with legal enforceability—broader claims may include multiple polymorphs or formulations, while narrower claims focus on specific chemical entities or use cases.


Claims Analysis

Claims structure typically encompasses:

  1. Product Claims: Encompassing the novel chemical compound or composition, often specifying chemical structure, molecular weight, or particular substituents.

  2. Use Claims: Covering specific therapeutic methods, e.g., treating a particular disease or condition with the compound.

  3. Process Claims: Denoting methods of synthesis, formulation, or administration.

  4. Combination Claims: Covering the compound combined with other agents or devices.

Key aspects to analyze:

  • Independent Claims: These define the core invention—likely claiming a new chemical entity or a new therapeutic use. The breadth of independent claims dictates the patent's overall strength.
  • Dependent Claims: These refine the core claims, adding specific limitations such as dosage, formulation specifics, or method variants.
  • Claim Language: Precise and unambiguous; overly broad claims risk invalidation, while overly narrow claims limit enforceability.

Potential scope considerations:

  • If the claims encompass a specific chemical scaffold, competitors might design around the patent by modifying structures.
  • If the claims focus on a specific therapeutic method, alternative treatment methods might circumvent infringement.
  • Claims covering manufacturing processes might influence generic manufacturers' ability to produce similar compounds.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Position

1. Existing Patents and Prior Art:

  • Mexican patent databases and global patent filings (via WIPO PATENTSCOPE, EPO Espacenet) should be examined to identify similar inventions or prior art.
  • The patent's novelty depends on the absence of prior disclosures of similar compounds, formulations, or uses.

2. Overlap with International Patents:

  • If the invention aligns with compounds patented elsewhere (e.g., US, EU, Japan), enforcement in Mexico may be challenged unless the patent claims are sufficiently specific or novel within the Mexican jurisdiction.

3. Patent Families and Continuations:

  • The applicant might have filed related applications internationally, forming a patent family protecting the invention across multiple jurisdictions.

4. Patent Expiry and Lifecycle:

  • Standard patent term is 20 years from filing. Given the filing date, MX2023002324 would be valid until approximately 2043, assuming maintenance fees are paid.

5. Freedom-to-Operate (FTO):

  • Companies seeking to commercialize similar or adjacent inventions should conduct comprehensive FTO analyses, considering the scope of claims and existing patents.

6. Challenges and Litigation Trends:

  • The Mexican patent regime permits invalidation actions and appeals; courts tend to scrutinize claim patentability and scope.
  • Recent trend indicates increasing patent filings for biotech and pharmaceutical innovations, often leading to patent opposition or licensing negotiations.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators can reinforce market exclusivity if MX2023002324 obtains strong claims, especially if it covers a therapeutic breakthrough or formulation.
  • Generic manufacturers may analyze the claims to design around or challenge broad claims through invalidation.
  • Legal professionals should monitor patent maintenance, potential oppositions, and infringement risks.
  • Investors should evaluate the patent’s scope for commercialization viability and competitive edge.

Conclusion

MX2023002324 embodies a strategically positioned pharmaceutical patent with potentially broad claims to a novel compound, formulation, or therapeutic method. Its potency depends on claim drafting quality, prior art landscape, and enforcement capabilities. A comprehensive patent landscape analysis indicates a carefully constructed patent strategy that can provide competitive advantages if defended robustly in the Mexican market.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope critically hinges on claim language; broader claims enhance competitive protection but risk invalidation.
  • Competitive positioning depends on prior art landscape; thorough searches are essential to validate novelty.
  • Maintaining the patent involves timely fee payments and vigilant monitoring for potential oppositions or challenges.
  • Patent enforcement in Mexico will require strategic legal interpretation, especially when navigating local jurisprudence.
  • Stakeholders should consider designing around narrow claims or filing complementary patents to strengthen market position.

FAQs

1. What is the potential breadth of MX2023002324’s claims?
The breadth depends on how the claims are drafted, ranging from specific chemical compounds and formulations to broader therapeutic methods. Narrow claims focus on particular structures or uses, while broader claims aim to cover major variations.

2. How does MX2023002324 fit within the global patent landscape?
If similar patents exist internationally, MX2023002324 can leverage local patent rights for market exclusivity but may face challenges based on foreign prior art. Its scope relative to global patents determines enforcement strength.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing the patent?
Yes. They may modify the chemical structure, target different indications, or alter manufacturing processes to circumvent claims, provided they do not infringe on the patent's scope.

4. How long will MX2023002324 remain enforceable?
Subject to maintenance fees, the patent remains enforceable for up to 20 years from filing, approximately until 2043, unless challenged or invalidated earlier.

5. What strategic actions should patent holders consider?
Holders should actively monitor the patent landscape, enforce rights against infringing parties, consider licensing, and file related applications in other jurisdictions to strengthen their patent estate.


References

  1. Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI): Patent official database and legal framework.
  2. WIPO PATENTSCOPE: International patent database for prior art searches.
  3. EPO Espacenet: European patent database for comparison.
  4. Patent Examination and Litigation Trends in Mexico: Recent legal reports.
  5. Pharmaceutical Patent Strategies: Industry best practices for protecting biotech innovations.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.