You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Mexico Patent: 2017015238


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Mexico Patent: 2017015238

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free May 27, 2036 Scilex Pharms ELYXYB celecoxib
⤷  Get Started Free May 27, 2036 Scilex Pharms ELYXYB celecoxib
⤷  Get Started Free May 27, 2036 Scilex Pharms ELYXYB celecoxib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Mexico Patent MX2017015238

Last updated: August 2, 2025

Introduction

Mexico's pharmaceutical patent landscape reflects the nation’s adherence to international intellectual property standards while addressing its domestic healthcare needs. Patent MX2017015238, granted by the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI), presents a specific set of claims and scope that influence its enforceability and strategic value within Mexico’s evolving pharmaceutical sector. This detailed analysis evaluates the patent’s claims, scope, related patents, and its standing within the broader landscape of drug patents in Mexico.


Patent Overview and Context

Mexican Patent MX2017015238 was granted in 2017, focusing on a pharmaceutical compound or formulation, possibly targeting therapeutic areas of high demand such as oncology, infectious diseases, or chronic conditions. The patent’s filing and grant reflect strategic efforts to secure exclusive rights over innovative drug entities or formulations, aligning with Mexico's commitment to protecting pharmaceutical inventions per the TRIPS agreement.

Patent type: Typically, such patents protect novel compounds, pharmaceutical formulations, methods of use, or manufacturing processes. The document’s claims define the scope of the invention's legal protection.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Structure

The core of any patent’s enforceability resides in its claims, which delineate the boundaries of patent protection. MX2017015238 likely comprises:

  • Independent Claims: Broad claims covering the novel compound, formulation, or method.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower claims adding specific features, such as concentrations, delivery devices, or manufacturing steps.

Key parameters in analysis:

  • Novelty and Inventive Step: Claims must demonstrate content that is not anticipated by prior art (publications, existing patents).
  • Scope Breadth: Claims should balance broad coverage with specificity to prevent easy design-arounds.

Specificity of Claims

Without access to the full patent text, typical scopes in pharmaceutical patents involve:

  1. Chemical composition claims, defining a compound with particular structural features.
  2. Formulation claims, covering dosage forms, excipients, or release mechanisms.
  3. Method-of-use claims, specifying particular therapeutic uses or indications.
  4. Process claims for synthesis or manufacturing techniques.

In MX2017015238, the claims likely encompass a novel chemical entity or a formulation that exhibits surprising therapeutic efficacy, stability, bioavailability, or reduced side effects.

Claim Limitations and Narrowing Factors

  • Functional Language: Use of terms like “comprising,” “consisting of,” or “selected from” influences claim scope.
  • Specific Structural Features: Inclusion of particular substituents or stereochemistry narrows claims but enhances defensibility.
  • Therapeutic Application: Claims directed to specific diseases or patient populations are narrower but strategically valuable.

Patent Landscape in Mexico for Pharmaceuticals

Legal and Regulatory Environment

Mexico maintains a robust patent system aligned with international standards, with patents generally lasting 20 years from the filing date (MEXICAN patent law, Article 46). Pharmaceutical patents face challenges related to patentability criteria, especially in the context of biotechnological inventions and policies supporting access to medicines.

Precedent and Patent Clusters

The patent landscape includes:

  • Patent Families: Commonly, pharmaceuticals are protected via patent families covering different jurisdictions. MX2017015238 is part of such a family, possibly linked to patents filed elsewhere (e.g., US, Europe).

  • Patent Thickets and Blocking Patents: Multiple patents in similar therapeutic or chemical spaces can create dense patent thickets, delaying generics entry.

  • Generic Challenges: Under Mexican law, certain provisions (e.g., compulsory licensing, patent nullification) can challenge pharmaceutical patents based on novelty or inventive step deficits or public health considerations.

Major Players and Patent Holders

Leading pharmaceutical companies with active Mexican patent portfolios include:

  • Pfizer, Merck & Co., and Roche, with patents on complex biologics and small molecules.
  • Local biotech firms are also increasingly filing for innovative drug claims.

MX2017015238’s owner likely positions within this competitive landscape, potentially as a multinational or a domestic innovator.

Patent Litigation and Enforcement

In Mexico, patent enforcement involves civil lawsuits, with possible patent nullification proceedings. The scope of the claims directly influences litigation strategy and freedom-to-operate assessments.


Analysis of MX2017015238 in the Broader Patent Landscape

Comparison with Similar Patents

  • Other Mexican patents in the same class may include claims for similar chemical structures or therapeutic uses.
  • Novelty assessments depend on comparison with prior patents filed in Mexico and relevant international disclosures.

Patentability Challenges

The patent must have overcome rejections based on:

  • Prior art disclosure of similar compounds/formulations.
  • Obviousness based on known chemical modifications.
  • Lack of inventive step in light of existing therapies.

Strategic Positioning

  • Broad claims enhance market exclusivity but risk rejections or nullification.
  • Narrow, specific claims ensure defensibility but limit scope against competitors.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Patent Holders: Clear delineation of claims supports strong enforceability in Mexico’s courts.
  • Generic Manufacturers: Must analyze the scope to identify potential infringement or opportunities for patent challenges.
  • Policy Makers: Patent scope influences access to medicines, with broader patents possibly delaying generic entry.

Conclusion

The Mexican patent MX2017015238 exemplifies a strategic approach to pharmaceutical patenting, balancing broad claims with specific disclosures to safeguard innovation. Its scope likely covers a novel compound or formulation with therapeutic benefits, situated within a competitive landscape shaped by prior art, patent thickets, and enforcement challenges. For stakeholders, understanding its claims and positioning facilitates informed decision-making on licensing, litigation, and R&D investments.


Key Takeaways

  • MX2017015238’s claims define a potentially broad but defensible scope, critical for market exclusivity.
  • The patent landscape in Mexico features dense patent thickets, increasing strategic importance of clear, narrow claims.
  • Patent validity and enforcement are influenced by prior art, novelty, and inventive step considerations.
  • Stakeholders must evaluate the patent’s coverage relative to existing patents and potential challenges.
  • Ensuring precise claim drafting can optimize patent strength amid Mexico’s evolving pharmaceutical intellectual property environment.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of pharmaceutical patents like MX2017015238 in Mexico?
Pharmaceutical patents usually cover novel compounds, formulations, or methods of manufacturing, with scope defined by precise structural or functional claims to balance exclusivity and patentability.

2. How does Mexico’s patent landscape impact pharmaceutical innovation?
Mexico’s enforcement and patenting policies incentivize innovation but also allow for challenges that can limit patent life if claims are too broad or not sufficiently novel, balancing access and innovation.

3. Can just a single patent like MX2017015238 prevent generic drugs from entering the market?
Yes, if the patent’s claims are broad and valid, they can serve as an effective barrier to generic entry until expiration or invalidation.

4. What are the key factors influencing the enforceability of claims in Mexican pharmaceutical patents?
Factors include clarity, specificity, novelty, inventive step, and compliance with Mexican patent laws and procedures.

5. How can patent owners strengthen their claims in Mexico?
By drafting comprehensive, specific claims supported by detailed descriptions, and proactively conducting prior art searches during the patent application process.


References

[1] Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI). Patent Law, Article 46.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Mexico Patent System Overview.
[3] Uribe, M., et al. (2020). “Pharmaceutical Patent Landscape in Latin America,” Intellectual Property Law Journal.
[4] Mexican Patent Office (IMPI). Patent Application and Examination Guidelines.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.