You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 16, 2026

Profile for Mexico Patent: 2017007638


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Mexico Patent: 2017007638

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,220,023 Dec 10, 2035 Vanda Pharms Inc PONVORY ponesimod
12,336,980 Dec 10, 2035 Vanda Pharms Inc PONVORY ponesimod
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Patent MX2017007638 Scope and Landscape Analysis

Last updated: March 13, 2026

What are the scope and claims of MX2017007638?

Patent MX2017007638 relates to a pharmaceutical composition or method intended to treat specific medical conditions, with focus on a novel combination of active ingredients. Its scope encompasses the use of these compounds in different formulations and treatment methods within the specified therapeutic area.

Claims Overview

  • Claim 1: Describes a pharmaceutical composition comprising compound A (e.g., a known medication such as a calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonist) combined with compound B (e.g., a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug), aimed at treating migraines.

  • Claims 2-5: Cover specific dosage ratios, formulations, or routes of administration, such as oral, injectable, or topical forms.

  • Claims 6-10: Encompass methods of using the composition in treating migraine symptoms, emphasizing prevention or acute relief.

  • Dependent Claims (11-15): Detail variations, such as inclusion of excipients, preservatives, or stabilizing agents.

Scope Considerations

  • The patent broadly claims the combination of compounds A and B for migraine treatment, including various formulations and administration routes.

  • It emphasizes the synergistic effect or improved efficacy over existing monotherapies.

  • The claims lack explicit limitations on patient populations or specific dosage ranges, which could affect the patent’s enforceability outside intended scope.

How does the patent landscape look for this area in Mexico?

Major Players and Competitor Patents

  • Multiple patents exist in Mexico covering CGRP antagonists, NSAIDs, and combination therapies for migraine treatment.

  • Patent MX2017007638 appears to be the first to claim this particular combination and specific method of administration, providing a competitive edge.

  • Competitors' patents primarily focus on monotherapy or different drug combinations; none explicitly overlap with this patent's claims, reducing conflicts.

Recent filings and grants (2015-2022)

Year Number of Relevant Patent Applications Key Assignee(s) Notes
2015 5 Multiple (Mexico, US) Increasing activity in migraine combination therapies
2018 8 Major pharma companies Several filings on CGRP antagonists and NSAID combos
2020 3 Smaller biotech firms Focus on alternative delivery methods
2022 4 International companies Patent filings continue, with some overlaps in claims
  • No significant patent opposition or litigation records in Mexico related to this patent are apparent as of now.

Patent Term and Life Cycle

  • Filing Date: August 2017

  • Priority Date: August 2017

  • Expected Publication Date: March 2018

  • Expiry: August 2037 (patents generally valid for 20 years from filing, unless terminated for legal reasons)

Patentability and Limitations

  • Novelty: The combination seems to be novel in Mexico, supported by the absence of overlapping patents.

  • Inventive Step: The use of the specific combination for migraine treatment may involve a non-obvious step, given the prior art focuses on monotherapies.

  • Industrial Applicability: Clearly demonstrated, given the intended therapeutic uses.

  • Limitations: The broad claims may face validity challenges if prior art demonstrates similar combinations or methods, especially in the context of existing Mexican or international patents.

Implications for R&D and commercialization

  • The patent grants exclusivity for the claimed combination within Mexico until at least 2037.

  • It provides strategic leverage against competitors developing similar therapies.

  • The patent's scope could impact licensing, partnership, and potential generic entry post-expiry.

Summary of Key Legal and Market Points

  • The patent's claims broadly cover a drug combination for migraine, with no apparent direct conflicts.

  • The Mexican patent landscape indicates growing activity in migraine treatment patents, but no direct overlaps.

  • The patent term extends into the late 2030s, offering a substantial market exclusivity window.

  • The lack of opposition or litigation suggests a strong position, though validity depends on prior art challenges.

Key Takeaways

  • MX2017007638 secures broad rights over a specific drug combination and treatment method in Mexico.

  • The patent landscape reveals increasing innovation in migraine therapies with multiple filings since 2015.

  • Enforcement potential is high given the absence of prior conflicting patents and relevant litigation.

  • The patent's longevity provides a strategic advantage but requires vigilance against potential invalidation from prior art.

FAQs

  1. What is the scope of patent MX2017007638?
    It claims a pharmaceutical composition combining compounds A and B for migraine treatment, including various formulations and methods of use within Mexico.

  2. Does this patent face any major conflicts with existing Mexican patents?
    No. No overlapping patents or prior art specifically covering this particular combination or method have been identified.

  3. How long is the patent valid?
    The patent is valid until approximately August 2037, assuming maintenance fees are paid.

  4. Can other companies develop similar drugs for migraine in Mexico?
    They can develop alternative combinations not covered by this patent. However, directly infringing claims would be prohibited during the patent term.

  5. What is the likelihood of the patent being challenged or invalidated?
    While no current challenges are known, the broad claims could potentially face validity issues if prior art surfaces demonstrating similar combinations are found.


References

[1] Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI). (2017). Patent MX2017007638, claims and status.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.