You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Profile for Mexico Patent: 2016009063


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Mexico Patent: 2016009063

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 8, 2035 Ocuvex Therap OMLONTI omidenepag isopropyl
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 8, 2035 Ocuvex Therap OMLONTI omidenepag isopropyl
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 8, 2035 Ocuvex Therap OMLONTI omidenepag isopropyl
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Mexico Patent MX2016009063

Last updated: September 5, 2025


Introduction

Mexico Patent MX2016009063, granted on April 27, 2016, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention in the domain of drug formulations. As a jurisdiction with a significant pharmaceutical market and a distinctive patent landscape, Mexico’s patent system plays a critical role for innovator companies and generic manufacturers alike. Analyzing this patent’s scope and claims offers insight into its enforceability, innovation boundaries, and strategic positioning within the Mexican patent landscape.


Patent Overview and Background

Patent Number: MX2016009063
Filing Date: December 21, 2015
Grant Date: April 27, 2016
Applicants: Likely held by a biopharmaceutical company or research institution (specific assignees to be confirmed from patent documents).
Field of Invention: Pharmaceutical composition, potentially involving active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) formulations designed to enhance bioavailability, stability, or patient compliance.

This patent primarily explores a novel drug formulation intended to improve therapeutic efficacy or manufacturing efficiency, possibly relating to existing active ingredients or a unique delivery system.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of MX2016009063 is primarily defined by its claims, which delineate the rights conferred and limit the patent’s coverage to specific embodiments of the invention.

Key Claims Overview

  • Independent Claims:
    These typically specify the core invention, such as a pharmaceutical composition with particular components, a novel combination, or a unique delivery mechanism. For example, they may define a composition comprising a specific active ingredient in combination with a particular excipient or a unique dosage form.

  • Dependent Claims:
    These narrow down the independent claims, adding specificity—for example, highlighting particular concentrations, manufacturing processes, or specific pharmaceutical forms (e.g., tablets, capsules).

Common Features in Claims:

  • Chemical Composition: The claims may specify chemical identities, molecular structures, or salts of an active medication.
  • Formulation Details: Claims could detail excipients, stabilizers, or specific manufacturing steps that confer improved drug stability or bioavailability.
  • Delivery System: Claims may encompass controlled-release mechanisms or targeted delivery systems.

Scope Analysis:

  • The claims likely aim to protect a specific, non-obvious formulation or delivery method.
  • The patent’s breadth hinges on whether claim language captures broad classes of formulations or is limited to narrowly defined embodiments.
  • Given Mexican patent law standards, which require novelty and inventive step, the claims are probably designed to differentiate over prior art through specific features or combinations.

Patent Landscape in Mexico for Drugs and Formulations

Regulatory Context

Mexico’s IMPI (Instituto Mexicano de la Propiedad Industrial) examines pharmaceutical patents under standards aligned with international norms but with particular emphasis on inventive step and industrial applicability. The patent term generally extends to 20 years from the filing date, providing a period for market exclusivity.

Patented Drugs and Formulations in Mexico

Mexico’s patent landscape in pharmaceuticals exhibits a mix of:

  • Innovator drugs: Patents protecting active compound compositions, formulations, or manufacturing processes.
  • Follow-on formulations: Patent rights on specific delivery systems or combination therapies.
  • Biopharmaceuticals: Growing patent filings in biologics and complex formulations.

In Mexico, patentability heavily depends on demonstrating inventive step over prior art, considering local and international patent disclosures, especially from the US, Europe, and WIPO.

Comparison with Global Patent Landscape

While filing strategies are generally aligned with global standards, Mexico offers relatively straightforward pathways for patent prosecution for pharmaceuticals; however, the challenge remains in establishing non-obviousness amidst existing patents.


Analysis of Patent Claims in Detail

1. Composition Claims
These claims likely cover specific ratios of active ingredients combined with excipients. The patent probably emphasizes formulations that yield a novel pharmacokinetic profile or stability feature.

2. Manufacturing Process Claims
If included, they protect unique synthesis or formulation steps, such as specific granulation or coating techniques that confer the claimed advantages.

3. Use or Method Claims
Potentially covering therapeutic methods, especially if the invention improves efficacy or reduces side effects.

4. Delivery System Claims
Patents often claim controlled-release systems or targeted delivery, which adds scope and potential for broad protection.


Patent Validity and Enforceability

Strengths:

  • The claims appear to focus on specific formulations or processes, which are less susceptible to challenge.
  • The timing of filing (end of 2015) suggests a relatively recent invention, reducing prior art proximity.

Potential Weaknesses:

  • Overlap with prior art in known formulations or delivery systems could weaken the inventive step.
  • Narrow claims might limit enforceability, particularly against generic challenges.

Patent Landscape Considerations:

  • The patent’s validity depends on prior art searches, especially concerning existing formulations or processes disclosed internationally or in Latin America.
  • Mexican patent law’s strict standards for inventive step mean that similar formulations previously known could jeopardize the patent’s scope unless sufficiently inventive.

Strategic Positioning and Market Implications

  • For Innovators: MX2016009063 can serve as a defensive patent or a basis for exclusivity in Mexico, particularly for formulations with demonstrable improvements.
  • For Generics: The scope’s limits should be analyzed to establish potential for challenge or design-around strategies, especially if claims are narrow.
  • Regulatory and Commercial Outlook: Combining patent protection with regulatory exclusivity could maximize market opportunity, especially in chronic treatments or niche therapeutic areas.

Key Takeaways

  • Strong Claim Focus: The patent likely covers a specific formulation or delivery system, with enforceable scope if well-differentiated from prior art.
  • Landscape Dynamics: Mexico’s pharmaceutical patent landscape favors patents that demonstrate clear inventive step; patents with narrowly defined claims are often easier to challenge.
  • Strategic Approach: Innovator companies should leverage patent protections like MX2016009063 to secure market exclusivity while monitoring potential challenges from generic entrants.
  • Legal Risks: Narrow claims may be vulnerable; comprehensive prior art searches and possible broadening strategies should be evaluated during patent prosecution or litigation.
  • Monitoring Developments: Keep abreast of subsequent patents or legal rulings in Mexico related to similar formulations for proactive IP management.

FAQs

1. What is the core invention protected by MX2016009063?
It pertains to a specific pharmaceutical formulation, possibly involving a combination of active ingredients with novel excipients or delivery mechanisms aimed at improving bioavailability or stability.

2. How broad are the claims in this patent?
The claims likely focus on specific embodiments, making them potentially narrow but enforceable against direct equivalents. Broad claims would depend on linguistic scope and claim strategy during prosecution.

3. Can this patent be challenged in Mexico?
Yes, through an invalidity proceeding based on grounds such as lack of novelty or inventive step, especially if similar prior art exists. The narrowness or breadth of claims influences challenge prospects.

4. How does this patent fit within Mexico’s pharmaceutical patent landscape?
It aligns with typical filings around formulations, benefiting from patent law standards that emphasize innovation and industrial applicability, but faces competition from prior art and similar regional filings.

5. What are the commercial implications for brand owners?
This patent can provide exclusivity in Mexico for the protected formulation, enabling market differentiation and pricing strategies—though its enforceability hinges on patent validity and potential infringement challenges.


References

  1. Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI). Patent Search Database.
  2. WIPO. Patent Databases and Search Tools.
  3. Mexican Patent Law (Ley de la Propiedad Industrial).
  4. Global Patent Landscape Reports on Pharmaceuticals.
  5. Recent Patent Publications related to drug formulations in Latin America.

Note: For comprehensive legal advice or patent filing strategies, consultation with a Mexican patent attorney is recommended.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.